Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
La Tech Exposed
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Hammer58 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 247
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 29
I Root For: LouisianaCajuns
Location:
Post: #61
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 10:40 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-13-2012 09:06 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Texas A&M all over 'em in the first quarter.

You probably need to edit the title of the thread to "La Tech Legit." Games are 4 Quarters.

And it could be argued that tech only played 3. At the end of 4 you were on the short end of the scoreboard. Nice comeback, your offense is explosive. But it takes Defense and Special Teams in addition to offensive fireworks.
10-14-2012 10:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #62
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 10:43 AM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 10:40 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-13-2012 09:06 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Texas A&M all over 'em in the first quarter.

You probably need to edit the title of the thread to "La Tech Legit." Games are 4 Quarters.

Being down by around 4 scores in the first quarter justifies the title.

What about winning by 4 scores in the final 3 quarters?
10-14-2012 10:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #63
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 10:55 AM)Hammer58 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 10:40 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-13-2012 09:06 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Texas A&M all over 'em in the first quarter.

You probably need to edit the title of the thread to "La Tech Legit." Games are 4 Quarters.

And it could be argued that tech only played 3. At the end of 4 you were on the short end of the scoreboard. Nice comeback, your offense is explosive. But it takes Defense and Special Teams in addition to offensive fireworks.

True. 03-banghead
10-14-2012 10:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slappycajun Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 573
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 26
I Root For: UL
Location:
Post: #64
RE: La Tech Exposed
Tech should be commended. That was an incredible game. And, you have one of the best offenses in college football.

Your fr. RB is a stud. While Malzahn loaded up on transfers, he missed that one. (I think kid was committed to Tech before Malzahn.)

IMO, Tech would win the Belt this year.

Experienced team with a lot of offensive weapons. I imagine they only finish the season with one loss.
10-14-2012 11:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #65
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 11:00 AM)slappycajun Wrote:  Tech should be commended. That was an incredible game. And, you have one of the best offenses in college football.

Your fr. RB is a stud. While Malzahn loaded up on transfers, he missed that one. (I think kid was committed to Tech before Malzahn.)

IMO, Tech would win the Belt this year.

Experienced team with a lot of offensive weapons. I imagine they only finish the season with one loss.

He visited stAte, but wasn't impressed. The Razorback fans were surprised they didn't offer him. He was a beast in high school, but played at a VERY small school, so it was hard to tell just how good he was. They were wrong.
10-14-2012 11:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crump1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,747
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 107
I Root For: stAte
Location:
Post: #66
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 11:04 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 11:00 AM)slappycajun Wrote:  Tech should be commended. That was an incredible game. And, you have one of the best offenses in college football.

Your fr. RB is a stud. While Malzahn loaded up on transfers, he missed that one. (I think kid was committed to Tech before Malzahn.)

IMO, Tech would win the Belt this year.

Experienced team with a lot of offensive weapons. I imagine they only finish the season with one loss.

He visited stAte, but wasn't impressed. The Razorback fans were surprised they didn't offer him. He was a beast in high school, but played at a VERY small school, so it was hard to tell just how good he was. They were wrong.
That isn't true. Freeze didn't recruit him and Malzahn came in after he committed to Tech. Kyle Coleman, Fredi Knighten and Dezmond Stegall were all more impressed with their visit to stAte obviously.

Dixon was from a small school and only had one FBS offer as of January because of it. Fortunate for Tech he was in their backyard.
10-14-2012 11:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #67
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 11:13 AM)Crump1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 11:04 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 11:00 AM)slappycajun Wrote:  Tech should be commended. That was an incredible game. And, you have one of the best offenses in college football.

Your fr. RB is a stud. While Malzahn loaded up on transfers, he missed that one. (I think kid was committed to Tech before Malzahn.)

IMO, Tech would win the Belt this year.

Experienced team with a lot of offensive weapons. I imagine they only finish the season with one loss.

He visited stAte, but wasn't impressed. The Razorback fans were surprised they didn't offer him. He was a beast in high school, but played at a VERY small school, so it was hard to tell just how good he was. They were wrong.
That isn't true. Freeze didn't recruit him and Malzahn came in after he committed to Tech. Kyle Coleman, Fredi Knighten and Dezmond Stegall were all more impressed with their visit to stAte obviously.

Dixon was from a small school and only had one FBS offer as of January because of it. Fortunate for Tech he was in their backyard.

I agree with all that, but what I said is true.
10-14-2012 11:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crump1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,747
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 107
I Root For: stAte
Location:
Post: #68
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 11:17 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 11:13 AM)Crump1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 11:04 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 11:00 AM)slappycajun Wrote:  Tech should be commended. That was an incredible game. And, you have one of the best offenses in college football.

Your fr. RB is a stud. While Malzahn loaded up on transfers, he missed that one. (I think kid was committed to Tech before Malzahn.)

IMO, Tech would win the Belt this year.

Experienced team with a lot of offensive weapons. I imagine they only finish the season with one loss.

He visited stAte, but wasn't impressed. The Razorback fans were surprised they didn't offer him. He was a beast in high school, but played at a VERY small school, so it was hard to tell just how good he was. They were wrong.
That isn't true. Freeze didn't recruit him and Malzahn came in after he committed to Tech. Kyle Coleman, Fredi Knighten and Dezmond Stegall were all more impressed with their visit to stAte obviously.

Dixon was from a small school and only had one FBS offer as of January because of it. Fortunate for Tech he was in their backyard.

I agree with all that, but what I said is true.
Most of it was true.
10-14-2012 11:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,755
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1063
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #69
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 11:00 AM)slappycajun Wrote:  Tech should be commended. That was an incredible game. And, you have one of the best offenses in college football.

Your fr. RB is a stud. While Malzahn loaded up on transfers, he missed that one. (I think kid was committed to Tech before Malzahn.)

IMO, Tech would win the Belt this year.

Experienced team with a lot of offensive weapons. I imagine they only finish the season with one loss.

He had committed to Tech before we hired Malzahn, we tried, but in the end he had been Brainwashed into believing that Ruston was a beautiful place to live.

Of course, if you have grown up in a town of 2,000 people like he did, everywhere looks beautiful.
10-14-2012 12:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #70
RE: La Tech Exposed
Freeze recruited him: http://arkansasstate.scout.com/2/1085165.html

Arkansas fans wanted him, but Arkansas never offered: http://www.hogville.net/yabbse/index.php?topic=444833.0
10-14-2012 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Green Menace Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,351
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 119
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #71
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 10:47 AM)Usajags Wrote:  I think this also shows TX A&M still doesn't know how to play a 60 minute game. Good showing by Tech for not quitting.
Exactly!
10-14-2012 12:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrushMI Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,077
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 35
I Root For: WKU
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #72
RE: La Tech Exposed
La Tech would not win the SBC. #119 in D...
10-14-2012 12:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Trulyb Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 122
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation: 1
I Root For: ULM
Location:
Post: #73
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 12:59 PM)CrushMI Wrote:  La Tech would not win the SBC. #119 in D...

They would contend but I say 3 teams out score them with that d. Worst corners I have seen this year. And only played 1 legit team
10-14-2012 01:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #74
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 12:59 PM)CrushMI Wrote:  La Tech would not win the SBC. #119 in D...

It really takes a great team to beat us. The only 2 losses in the last 14 games were to #15 TCU (31-24) and #22 Texas A&M (59-57). You guys are underestimating us for some reason. If we can score 57 on A&M (giving up 14 pts a game), I feel we could score 60 on Sun Belt teams. That sounds like I'm underestimating your teams, but I'm not... our offense is just that good. I do think there are some Sun Belt teams that could score 40 or more on us though.
10-14-2012 01:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Atlanta Trojan Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 12,796
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 179
I Root For: TROY
Location: Senoia Ga
Post: #75
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 01:07 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 12:59 PM)CrushMI Wrote:  La Tech would not win the SBC. #119 in D...

It really takes a great team to beat us. The only 2 losses in the last 14 games were to #15 TCU (31-24) and #22 Texas A&M (59-57). You guys are underestimating us for some reason. If we can score 57 on A&M (giving up 14 pts a game), I feel we could score 60 on Sun Belt teams. That sounds like I'm underestimating your teams, but I'm not... our offense is just that good. I do think there are some Sun Belt teams that could score 40 or more on us though.

You really think A&M will finish ranked with that pathetic Defense? They still have LSU, Alabama, Mississippi State and Missouri left to play. They already have 1 loss, and will probably end up with at minimum 4 losses03-lmfao
(This post was last modified: 10-14-2012 01:10 PM by Atlanta Trojan.)
10-14-2012 01:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Trulyb Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 122
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation: 1
I Root For: ULM
Location:
Post: #76
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 01:07 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 12:59 PM)CrushMI Wrote:  La Tech would not win the SBC. #119 in D...

It really takes a great team to beat us. The only 2 losses in the last 14 games were to #15 TCU (31-24) and #22 Texas A&M (59-57). You guys are underestimating us for some reason. If we can score 57 on A&M (giving up 14 pts a game), I feel we could score 60 on Sun Belt teams. That sounds like I'm underestimating your teams, but I'm not... our offense is just that good. I do think there are some Sun Belt teams that could score 40 or more on us though.

I just think we out score you with that d
10-14-2012 01:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #77
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 01:08 PM)Atlanta Trojan Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 01:07 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(10-14-2012 12:59 PM)CrushMI Wrote:  La Tech would not win the SBC. #119 in D...

It really takes a great team to beat us. The only 2 losses in the last 14 games were to #15 TCU (31-24) and #22 Texas A&M (59-57). You guys are underestimating us for some reason. If we can score 57 on A&M (giving up 14 pts a game), I feel we could score 60 on Sun Belt teams. That sounds like I'm underestimating your teams, but I'm not... our offense is just that good. I do think there are some Sun Belt teams that could score 40 or more on us though.

You really think A&M will finish ranked with that pathetic Defense? They still have LSU, Alabama, Mississippi State and Missouri left to play. They already have 1 loss, and will probably end up with at minimum 4 losses03-lmfao

I do think A&M will finish ranked if Manziel stays health (he is their team). Their defense has been pretty good:

Florida - 20
SMU - 3
SC State - 14
Arkansas - 10
Ole Miss - 27 (with 6 A&M turnovers)
10-14-2012 01:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Atlanta Trojan Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 12,796
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 179
I Root For: TROY
Location: Senoia Ga
Post: #78
RE: La Tech Exposed
You r blinded dude.... SEC is about defense! They will get killed by 3 of those 4. Ole miss nearly got them03-lmfao
10-14-2012 01:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #79
RE: La Tech Exposed
(10-14-2012 01:25 PM)Atlanta Trojan Wrote:  You r blinded dude.... SEC is about defense! They will get killed by 3 of those 4. Ole miss nearly got them03-lmfao

If they can stop Manziel (like Florida did), they will stop A&M. He's a very good player though. Florida beat them by 3 and they appear to be about as good as there is in the SEC. I'm looking forward to watching them the rest of the way to see what Johnny Football can do against LSU and Alabama. Their defense will be fine against SEC running teams.
10-14-2012 01:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
joshdude182 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 598
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 7
I Root For: North Texas
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Post: #80
RE: La Tech Exposed
No one in the belt has any room to discredit La Tech. I don't see a single team in belt hanging with A&M like Tech did. Tech would run the table in the belt.
10-14-2012 03:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.