(05-30-2012 11:27 PM)GreenBison Wrote: (05-30-2012 11:52 AM)herdfan2013 Wrote: I'm surprised noone has brought up the fact that WV was born from a few counties of VA wanting to remain with the union.
Not true, WV was formed for lack of state representation in the Tide Water area. The Civil War was a way to get our own representation. It's basic Middle School WV History class.
Its true to a point; Wheeling as well as many of the northern counties are/ were more closely tied to Penn. & Ohio rather than Richmond and the south. They voted for and pushed for remaining in the union and when they lost, worked to create a restored gov. of VA that originally met in Wheeling, but after statehood was granted, moved to Alexandria.
Much of what became WV was defined by Union lines. There were some counties that wanted to join that were left out because they were outside these lines, and there were some counties that wanted to remain in VA, but were forced in because of their location. the counties of the eastern panhandle did not want to remain in VA, nor did they want to join WV; they wanted to become a part of Maryland.
The southern counties were not really a significant area due to their relatively isolated nature and sparse populations. They may have identified with the southern states more than the northern states, but that identification was meaningless in the grand scheme of WV statehood.
----------------------------------------------
Besides, the north/south identifying marker is dying. Rising in its place is a urban/rural marker. People in Atlanta have more in common with people in New York, Philadelphia, and other major metros than they do with people in rural southern areas. And people in rural Pennsylvania have more in common with people in rural southern areas than they do with the average person in Philadelphia...