<a href='http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/story/7321926' target='_blank'>http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/...l/story/7321926</a>

The Pac-10's plan calls for one of the four existing bowls (Sugar, Rose, Fiesta, Orange) to host two games each year, presumably on a rotating basis.

The No. 1 and No. 2 teams in the BCS ratings would be predetermined by the BCS ratings. The pair would face off in a title game the week after the four bowls are played.

That would free up access and provide a higher profile for the non-BCS teams. BCS presidents agreed in February to provide more access to non-BCS schools. The access included a fifth BCS bowl game, if the market supported it.

broncobob Wrote:<a href='http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/story/7321926' target='_blank'>http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/...l/story/7321926</a>

The Pac-10's plan calls for one of the four existing bowls (Sugar, Rose, Fiesta, Orange) to host two games each year, presumably on a rotating basis.

The No. 1 and No. 2 teams in the BCS ratings would be predetermined by the BCS ratings. The pair would face off in a title game the week after the four bowls are played.

That would free up access and provide a higher profile for the non-BCS teams. BCS presidents agreed in February to provide more access to non-BCS schools. The access included a fifth BCS bowl game, if the market supported it.

Interesting that a non-BCS commish was one of the originators of the idea.
================================================
Sun Belt commissioner Wright Waters and Notre Dame athletic director Kevin White first started kicking around the idea between themselves late last month at the BCS meetings in Phoenix.

Pac-10 administrators seemed interested and discussed the plan two weeks ago at their spring meetings.