+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: WACbbs (/forum-376.html)
+--- Thread: PAC10 BCS Bowl Plan (/thread-25722.html)
- broncobob - 05-12-2004 09:21 AM
<a href='http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/story/7321926' target='_blank'>http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/...l/story/7321926</a>
The Pac-10's plan calls for one of the four existing bowls (Sugar, Rose, Fiesta, Orange) to host two games each year, presumably on a rotating basis.
The No. 1 and No. 2 teams in the BCS ratings would be predetermined by the BCS ratings. The pair would face off in a title game the week after the four bowls are played.
That would free up access and provide a higher profile for the non-BCS teams. BCS presidents agreed in February to provide more access to non-BCS schools. The access included a fifth BCS bowl game, if the market supported it.
- MeanGreen61 - 05-12-2004 09:30 AM
broncobob Wrote:<a href='http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/story/7321926' target='_blank'>http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/...l/story/7321926</a>Interesting that a non-BCS commish was one of the originators of the idea.
The Pac-10's plan calls for one of the four existing bowls (Sugar, Rose, Fiesta, Orange) to host two games each year, presumably on a rotating basis.
The No. 1 and No. 2 teams in the BCS ratings would be predetermined by the BCS ratings. The pair would face off in a title game the week after the four bowls are played.
That would free up access and provide a higher profile for the non-BCS teams. BCS presidents agreed in February to provide more access to non-BCS schools. The access included a fifth BCS bowl game, if the market supported it.
================================================
Sun Belt commissioner Wright Waters and Notre Dame athletic director Kevin White first started kicking around the idea between themselves late last month at the BCS meetings in Phoenix.
Pac-10 administrators seemed interested and discussed the plan two weeks ago at their spring meetings.