(02-11-2018 11:35 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(02-11-2018 10:27 PM)Florida RedWolf Wrote:  

(02-11-2018 12:45 PM)AppManDG Wrote:  

(02-11-2018 11:24 AM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  

(02-11-2018 11:13 AM)AppManDG Wrote:  It's impossible to reason with a liberal. Their emotional based arguments are void of facts and any attempt to have an exchange of ideas most often results in an irrational and, yes I'll say it, hysterical outbust.

Remember when we had a back and fourth about evolution and your source for your scientific stances was the Bible? Gotta love those “facts” that aren’t based on emotions at all.

Being a moderate, it’s easy to see the hypocrisy of both sides.

I made an intellectual decision to believe the Bible's Creation story. It is based on faith, not emotion. People who do not have faith in God do not understand it. I get it, but anyone who pretends to have home run answers to fly ball questions is fooling themselves. I suppose it's up to the individual to decide what the "facts" are. Why people can't respect differences of opinion without demonizing or trivializing those who hold alternative views is beyond me. Kinda like you taking it upon yourself to decide what is and what is not hypocrisy. Time to get back to sports.

Much agree. Its sad so many want to minimize believers and the Bible to make it fit their poor understanding. For those into "facts", the Bible is a great book of early world history. Look it up!

The Bible is not science. It is a book. Because of the time it is written, we have no way to prove how much of the bible is a perfect written representation of early World History. We can only as Christians, believe in its authenticity.

It is not a source I would use as a resource in science class.

Science is surfaced by you. History is surfaced by me. Big difference between the two. I would apprecate you making me aware of any material difference regarding early world history, i.e. nations, empires, rulers, kings, queens, actions, etc..