(05-11-2017 01:10 PM)otown Wrote:  

(05-11-2017 11:21 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(05-11-2017 09:27 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Aresco explains his argument and strategy himself in the following podcast interview. The interview begins at the 27:30 mark of the podcast.

http://d3efjls8gnbg8i.cloudfront.net/164....hosted.cx

Aresco says he's "convinced that (AAC) top teams would do just as well" in P5 leagues.

Yes, this makes sense, even though AAC champ Temple being soundly defeated by the 10th place ACC team this past season in a bowl game?

Aresco is a decent comic.

i disagree. apple to oranges. a houston, UCF, USF, etc etc will recruit a hell of a lot better than that 10th place ACC team if a member of a P5 conference. so your argument holds no water...... they would easily do well.

That's not what Aresco said. He didn't say "put UCF in the ACC or make the AAC an equal P6 partner and UCF could compete for ACC title", what he said was that right now, as members of the G5 AAC, those AAC schools could compete for the ACC title like they do for the AAC title. His contention is that right now, the football product of the G5 AAC is equivalent to that of the P5, that top AAC teams would be top teams in P5 leagues.

And that's comical.