There is a lot of discussion that the tournament hasn't been very good. I disagree, many games have been highly competitive. It is interesting to me though they are complaining about "lack of upsets" when the committee clearly bracketed teams in a way to reduce any potential upsets. When you pit mids against mids and give other good mids bad matchups (UNCW vs UVA for instance), people should not be surprised. This year was one of the worst and most intentional seeding jobs, yet seems like nobody is calling the committee out for causing this "ho hum tournament". They are getting exactly what they wanted: Few upsets and all of the money going to the power conferences.