(02-25-2015 09:06 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 08:29 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 08:05 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 08:01 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 07:58 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Congrats on getting a consolation mention. I'm sure if I dug deep I could find Blake Bortles in 2013's somewhere. Fact of the matter is, Carden didn't even finish top 10 in consideration.

So I guess whoever runs the Heisman website is a ECU fan?

Getting a mention in the website doesn't constitute contention! No one actually considered Shane Carden, which is required at minimum to be a dark horse. You didn't hear the spin from ESPN talking about "Carden's Heisman Campaign" or how "this victory over UNC should solidify his case for the Heisman". No one except delusional ECU fans thought he even came close for a chance. It's just as ridiculous as considering Blake Bortles a darkhorse in 2013. Moreso, even, considering Blake Bortles is a better QB than Carden.

It's not a mention! It's his own freakin page! Its literally labeled Heimsan Contenders. God forbid it was freaking Taco Falls, or the board would be freaking shut down because of all the freaking posts!

So if I make a youtube campaign on why I should be president, and it gets covered on CNN, i'm a dark horse presidential candidate?

And I find it hilarious that KnightLight has managed to troll the entire board, and you guys are just feeding him and the rest of the UCF fans out to look for a laugh.

You're the only one trolling.

Fox News (or whatever) talking about you as president would make you a "darkhorse candidate", which is the correct analogy here.