(04-20-2013 02:20 PM)featherhead Wrote:  

(04-20-2013 11:09 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(04-20-2013 01:19 AM)featherhead Wrote:  [quote='MTPiKapp' pid='9250888' dateline='1366427106']

Yes, let me ask the sportswriters you vaguely referred to: if not ULM, who has the worst overall athletic department in FBS?

I guess I would not feel comfortable referring to any school as the "worst overall athletic department in FBS" especially if in the previous season they had won the conference baseball tournament, had beaten an SEC team (Arkansas), had gone to a bowl, had beaten my own team in football 31-17 and had completed a winning season with an out of conference win against Tulane 63-10 and close losses to Auburn 28-31 and Baylor 42-47. But that's just me.

--featherhead

One season does not change everything. Nearly two decades to have your first winning season in football and less than five total Sun Belt titles across all sports in nearly a decade of competition. You aren't even averaging a championships a year. I wonder how many programs across the country can say they've had multiple years without a single conference championship in.any sport.

Mentioning a win over Tulane and two close losses....
[/ld quote]

I was just thinking those close OOC losses were probably more impressive than ULM's win last season over Middle 31-17 or our win over you the year before by a score of 42-14. Also, if I had gone further back in time and mentioned ULM's wins over Miss. State, Kentucky and Alabama, you would have said that only the most recent records really matter, and you would have been right. ULM will continue to do the best it can with what it has.

--featherhead

Moral victories and meaningless wins that get ULM NOWHERE. Win when it counts...not when you catch an SEC team napping. If that's all you have to beat your chest over...head back to the drawing board, cause you are doing it wrong. Bootleg and slide is no way to go through life son.