BrianJ
Heisman
Posts: 5,122
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 55
I Root For:
Location: |
Was there an offset clause in Pastner's first two contracts?
It seems that we could get to the heart of the issue with either of two documents:
- Pastner's original contract from May 2009
- Pastner's extension from March 2011
If those documents - presumably negotiated and signed by R.C. Johnson - don't have an offset clause, then it's not surprising that the extension from March 2013 doesn't have one either.
If those first two contracts do contain an offset clause, and Raines/Lipman/Bowen allowed it to be removed in the 2013 extension, that's a totally different story. Who suggested its removal? What was the basis for that decision?
Does anyone have a copy of those documents handy?
If so, can you share them here?
If not, we'll need to brush up on our FOIA skills. Although I assume the request mentioned in yesterday's article will address some of these documents.
|
|
| 03-23-2016 12:50 PM |
|
/
Was there an offset clause in Pastner's first two contracts?
