(04-05-2014 07:56 PM)eager eagle Wrote:  

(04-03-2014 09:19 PM)Saint Greg Wrote:  

(04-03-2014 09:07 PM)Niner National Wrote:  all that matters in contracts at this level is buyout. I'm sure you guys worked a nice one into the contract.

$600k after year one
$500k after year two
$400k after year three
$300k after year four
$200k after year five

I think before this he was 600k before this month, 500k this month, 400k next year...so an increase of 200k after next season.

If anyone wonders how a program, La Tech, can pay their coach $600,000 per year yet only have about 1,000 paying fans per game then check the amount they stiff the taxpayers, over $9mil last fiscal year, to cover the losses in their athletic dept per year. Obviously the La taxpayers have deep pockets.

(04-05-2014 08:17 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:13 PM)eager eagle Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:03 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  took EE long enough to show up

Well, La Tech only averages about 1,000 paying fans per home game therefore I was only trying to explain for those who wonder how they do that. Simply speaking, deep pocket taxpayers. I don't see how you could object to a post explaining that for everyone.

it was most likely the bank of James Davison

EE for someone who hates Tech, you seem to really only show up when you can find a way to bash them

He's an idiot. I'm a season ticket holder and if there are only 1000 paying fans we're letting 1500 in free on our worst night..and 4000-5000 in free on our best night. It's all moot anyways he should know we can't give coaches raises using state funds as he is implying.