CSNbbs
USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Kyra Memorial Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds (/thread-818788.html)



USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - UofMstateU - 05-27-2017 04:50 PM

Earlier this week, USAA gave into some of the screaming from the left and pulled advertising from Hannity. (Yes, this is related to Seth Rich, which always leads back to Podesta and Hillary, but I digress.)

After announcing they were pulling ads from Hannity, the libturds shrieked with glee.

There paying customers, however, did not. USAA got hit with a sh*tstorm. They should have known it, as their customer base is active and retired military families.

In an attempt to save face, USAA said that they were removing advertising from Hannity because advertising on "opinion" shows went against their advertising policy.

Then it was pointed out that they were advertising on Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews, and Lawrence ODonnel on MSNBC.

Ooops. But no problem. It was just an oversight. So now they are pulling advertising from MSNBC.

Now they are hated by everyone.

Well done dipsh*ts. This is EXACTLY what happens to a company when you allow sh*t for brains ideological employees make stupid ass decisions for you.

Enjoy your sh*t storm, USAA.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/27/usaa-will-pull-ads-msnbc-after-dumping-foxs-hannit/


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - DavidSt - 05-27-2017 04:56 PM

Rachel Maddow is more educational than anybody else on MSNBC. She showed diagrams and all that about the Japan's nuclear plant that was damaged by the earthquake a few years back, and how the melt down would happen that could seriously becoming another Chernobyl in Russia.


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - wahoowa - 05-27-2017 05:03 PM

(05-27-2017 04:56 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Rachel Maddow is more educational than anybody else on MSNBC. She showed diagrams and all that about the Japan's nuclear plant that was damaged by the earthquake a few years back, and how the melt down would happen that could seriously becoming another Chernobyl in Russia.

Wow, you saw a diagram on MSNBC? I'm impressed, your education level must have jumped several notches! mazel tov!


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - UofMstateU - 05-27-2017 05:05 PM

(05-27-2017 04:56 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Rachel Maddow is more educational than anybody else on MSNBC. She showed diagrams and all that about the Japan's nuclear plant that was damaged by the earthquake a few years back, and how the melt down would happen that could seriously becoming another Chernobyl in Russia.

Did you see her poll results that showed Hillary TIED in South Carolina. It was LEGIT METHODOLOGY.

You didnt? Well, let me help you out.





MUH EDUCATIONAL TV!


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - UofMstateU - 05-27-2017 05:07 PM

USAA is taking a freaking beatdown on their facebook page.

Congrats! Way to take the express lane to Target hell.


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - Bull_Is_Back - 05-27-2017 05:29 PM

(05-27-2017 04:56 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Rachel Maddow is more educational than anybody else on MSNBC. She showed diagrams and all that about the Japan's nuclear plant that was damaged by the earthquake a few years back, and how the melt down would happen that could seriously becoming another Chernobyl in Russia.

And then there was this educational gem from Maddow





Which was, of course, fake news....

As was this.





If Maddow had any bow in her quiver that was not "snark" she might be half watchable.


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - Bull_Is_Back - 05-27-2017 05:31 PM

So clue me in, aside from an unproven allegation by one reporter what did Hannity do?


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - UofMstateU - 05-27-2017 05:46 PM

(05-27-2017 05:31 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  So clue me in, aside from an unproven allegation by one reporter what did Hannity do?

He said the name "Seth Rich", and half of DC started crapping their pants.


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - bullet - 05-27-2017 06:17 PM

(05-27-2017 05:31 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  So clue me in, aside from an unproven allegation by one reporter what did Hannity do?

He basically did the exact same thing NYT, ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN are doing with Trump and Russia. He took an anonymous source who really didn't know the details and talked about it on his show.

Except, of course, there is a least a little logic in the possibility that Rich was hit while there is none in the idea that Trump was bought.


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - Hood-rich - 05-27-2017 06:59 PM

(05-27-2017 04:56 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Rachel Maddow is more educational than anybody else on MSNBC. She showed diagrams and all that about the Japan's nuclear plant that was damaged by the earthquake a few years back, and how the melt down would happen that could seriously becoming another Chernobyl in Russia.
I'm beginning to wonder if I should stop giving you a hard time.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - DavidSt - 05-27-2017 07:09 PM

Kim Dotcom is not a reliable source. He ran a site called Megaupload which was another Pirate Bay website that housed stolen movies, music and so forth. And you guys believe that crook?


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - Kronke - 05-27-2017 07:34 PM

(05-27-2017 07:09 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Kim Dotcom is not a reliable source. He ran a site called Megaupload which was another Pirate Bay website that housed stolen movies, music and so forth. And you guys believe that crook?

He provided a legitimate service. If people chose to use said service for illicit reasons, that isn't his fault. If Kim Dotcom is a criminal, so is Satoshi Nakamoto, Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, etc.


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - Owl 69/70/75 - 05-27-2017 07:35 PM

(05-27-2017 07:09 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Kim Dotcom is not a reliable source. He ran a site called Megaupload which was another Pirate Bay website that housed stolen movies, music and so forth. And you guys believe that crook?

I'm going to believe whomever the evidence supports, if and when any actual evidence turns up. Until then, I don't believe anybody.


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - WoodlandsOwl - 05-27-2017 07:37 PM

Back in the day USAA was open to Officers only. Things have now changed. More PC now in marketing.


RE: USAA - The Results of a poor decision to give in to libturds - UofMstateU - 05-28-2017 12:08 PM

Nearly 2300 posts in the USAA Sean Hannity thread on the USAA site. And most of these posts are comprised of multiple paragraphs, and proper grammar and spelling. In other words, customers who laying out their true feelings about the company. Not some drive by troll.

Happy Memorial Day Weekend to the fucknuts at USAA! I cant wait to see how they try to contort their statements and try to get out of this one.