Quote:Democrats want to talk about the lawfare against former President Donald Trump.

But they don't get that many view it not as a negative against Trump but as another example of the partisanship against him. It's not the flex they think it is.

Megyn Kelly was a great example of that when she appeared Saturday at the Alli-In Summit with "All-In Podcast" hosts Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg. They're all successful and wealthy tech entrepreneurs. She dropped an epic response, when asked about the lawfare, as our friends at our sister site Twitchy noted.

Warning for graphic language:

Jason Calacanis asked about some of the cases, erroneously saying Trump had been found "guilty" in civil cases.

Kelly brought him up short, correcting him on the facts and the terminology.

His partners on the show also came back on him a bit, asking whether he knows Kelly is a lawyer,and said, "You said three convictions, now you're walking it back."

Then he asked if she thought all five cases had issues. "100 percent," she said.

That's when Kelly went to town. First, she noted the change of the law in the Carroll case. Next, she hit the problems in the fraud case brought in New York by Attorney General Letitia James, including that the banks didn't consider themselves victims and James ran on a promise of getting Trump.

She also snarked about how "Soros" Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg didn't like to bring any cases except against Donald Trump. There were questions there as well. Then she spoke about the Georgia case, where she referred to the relationship between Fulton County DA Fani Willis and Nathan Wade. Then she pointed out how the Florida classified documents case was likely to fall as well.

David Sacks then teased Calacanis, saying he thought "JCal" had lost his right to bring up lawfare ever again, and "We're done with your b**s***, it's over." Calacanis responded that people weren't there to hear his opinion. Indeed. But he offered it anyway, and it got roundly knocked down.

The audience was hooting, they just loved it, which should tell you where a lot of people's heads are at on the matter. But I think that's a window into how a lot of Americans think on the subject:

Link

Man, Kelly ran over that dude like a freight train over a pumpkin.

Was that Tanq?

Bwahahahahahs


That sounded like his utter bullshite

That was epic. You could see his peeny shrinking.

But, he says that they're not there to hear his opinion but yet he gives it. DUR!

The only reason he says that at the end is because he got SCHOOLED!