(09-25-2024 10:43 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 09:49 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-24-2024 07:09 PM)450bench Wrote:  lol. I asked a guy (sort of) in a camel toe shirt a question in line at the store. Thought it was interesting and shared it here.

I guess it triggered a goober who likes to argue. I think that’s as funny as the actual event at the store.



A Trump win could REALLY inspire some gems from this guy.

“Skyscreamer lon isle 11, Irv. Skyscreamer on isle 11.”

No doubt. I mean, if a couple of random stories trigger him like this, just imagine what's coming on November 6th if Trump wins.

Yes. Mentioning that berating a stranger next to you in line as acting like an aggressive jack-Ds is quite a ‘triggered reaction.’

I will take it that you think being being an aggressive shittard to a random stranger next to you in line over a shirt is your aspiration as well. That isn’t surprising.

Nothing like some pinhead who tries to interject that with shittard random comments about schools and people. As seems to be the only manner that some can interact with anyone that doesn’t agree with them here.

Have a great day festus

Not for nothin' Tanq but you don't have to respond to him to prolong these threads?

(09-25-2024 10:42 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:31 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 07:42 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(09-24-2024 11:30 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  What are you some stuck up snob who believes it below you to speak to your fellow countrymen?

Must be geographic thing? That would suck, imo. I've always been one to chat up someone in public. Not some long drawn out dialogue, but just polite conversation.

Exactly, for some it must be much more comfortable to stand in places with strangers for periods of time and just stare at each other. Most pleasant I presume.

Talking someone up in line is one thing.

Acting like an antagonistic aggressive ******* to someone in line based on a tee shirt is at the absolute extreme of talking someone up in line.

And there you go, making up crap on the go. You are nothing but a liar, some of us around here already know that.

Yeah, what 450 did wasn't even aggressive. He was just trying to make conversation. It's not his fault the guy in the Kamala shirt didn't have anything to back up his claims. Also, the black man behind him even said Kamala's a phony. The aggressive one was the guy in the Kamala shirt shooting them the bird as he walked away to go to another line.

But Pretzel Logic Lawyer Man gonna Pretzel Logic Lawyer Man. (Also, to Pretzel Logic Lawyer man: Quit derailing threads with your pretzel logic. Nobody cares.)

(09-25-2024 11:38 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 10:42 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:31 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 07:42 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Must be geographic thing? That would suck, imo. I've always been one to chat up someone in public. Not some long drawn out dialogue, but just polite conversation.

Exactly, for some it must be much more comfortable to stand in places with strangers for periods of time and just stare at each other. Most pleasant I presume.

Talking someone up in line is one thing.

Acting like an antagonistic aggressive ******* to someone in line based on a tee shirt is at the absolute extreme of talking someone up in line.

And there you go, making up crap on the go. You are nothing but a liar, some of us around here already know that.

Yeah, what 450 did wasn't even aggressive. He was just trying to make conversation. It's not his fault the guy in the Kamala shirt didn't have anything to back up his claims. Also, the black man behind him even said Kamala's a phony. The aggressive one was the guy in the Kamala shirt shooting them the bird as he walked away to go to another line.

But Pretzel Logic Lawyer Man gonna Pretzel Logic Lawyer Man. (Also, to Pretzel Logic Lawyer man: Quit derailing threads with your pretzel logic. Nobody cares.)

Got it, it’s all the fault of the guy in the shirt. Sounds awesome. lol.

This place is better than a comic book.

(09-25-2024 11:42 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:38 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 10:42 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:31 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  Exactly, for some it must be much more comfortable to stand in places with strangers for periods of time and just stare at each other. Most pleasant I presume.

Talking someone up in line is one thing.

Acting like an antagonistic aggressive ******* to someone in line based on a tee shirt is at the absolute extreme of talking someone up in line.

And there you go, making up crap on the go. You are nothing but a liar, some of us around here already know that.

Yeah, what 450 did wasn't even aggressive. He was just trying to make conversation. It's not his fault the guy in the Kamala shirt didn't have anything to back up his claims. Also, the black man behind him even said Kamala's a phony. The aggressive one was the guy in the Kamala shirt shooting them the bird as he walked away to go to another line.

But Pretzel Logic Lawyer Man gonna Pretzel Logic Lawyer Man. (Also, to Pretzel Logic Lawyer man: Quit derailing threads with your pretzel logic. Nobody cares.)

Got it, it’s all the fault of the guy in the shirt. Sounds awesome. lol.

This place is better than a comic book.

I wear Cards/Southern Miss gear … if you DIDN’T fk with me, I’d be pissed in a fanatical setting … poly in public are fair game…

I have zero sympathy for those that can’t engage in simple capacity … polygaggedfagoos

Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even saying "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

(09-25-2024 10:42 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:31 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 07:42 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(09-24-2024 11:30 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  What are you some stuck up snob who believes it below you to speak to your fellow countrymen?

Must be geographic thing? That would suck, imo. I've always been one to chat up someone in public. Not some long drawn out dialogue, but just polite conversation.

Exactly, for some it must be much more comfortable to stand in places with strangers for periods of time and just stare at each other. Most pleasant I presume.

Talking someone up in line is one thing.

Acting like an antagonistic aggressive ******* to someone in line based on a tee shirt is at the absolute extreme of talking someone up in line.

And there you go, making up crap on the go. You are nothing but a liar, some of us around here already know that.

Yes. I am absolutely positive that 450, who is known world wide for nothing but acceptance of alternative viewpoints, initiated that with no intent to antagonize.

Wholly strewn with homophobic language in his excited retelling shows nothing but innocent intent. Along with the nothing but endearing or flat emotional language he employs in describing the guy.

Yeah, zero antagonism by 450. Zilch, zero, nada. Lolz.

Keep jumping up and down and flapping your arms how this wasn’t an antagonistic driven encounter. Double lolz.

Sounds to me like a pinhead who wanted to ‘face’ someone, and went out of his way to do so. But please keep defending and denying that…. Triple lie lolz.

(09-25-2024 11:38 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 10:42 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:31 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 07:42 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Must be geographic thing? That would suck, imo. I've always been one to chat up someone in public. Not some long drawn out dialogue, but just polite conversation.

Exactly, for some it must be much more comfortable to stand in places with strangers for periods of time and just stare at each other. Most pleasant I presume.

Talking someone up in line is one thing.

Acting like an antagonistic aggressive ******* to someone in line based on a tee shirt is at the absolute extreme of talking someone up in line.

And there you go, making up crap on the go. You are nothing but a liar, some of us around here already know that.

Yeah, what 450 did wasn't even aggressive. He was just trying to make conversation.

Precisely. What kind of crybaby runs away because someone engages in conversation at a check out line?

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

How bout 450 didn’t need to say or flap his lips with *anything* at the start? What a concept…. Lolz. I guess that initiator is lost on you. Lolz.

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:38 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 10:42 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:31 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  Exactly, for some it must be much more comfortable to stand in places with strangers for periods of time and just stare at each other. Most pleasant I presume.

Talking someone up in line is one thing.

Acting like an antagonistic aggressive ******* to someone in line based on a tee shirt is at the absolute extreme of talking someone up in line.

And there you go, making up crap on the go. You are nothing but a liar, some of us around here already know that.

Yeah, what 450 did wasn't even aggressive. He was just trying to make conversation.

Precisely. What kind of crybaby runs away because someone engages in conversation at a check out line?

I used to have a saying that I need to start using again: "Take the tampon out of your ass and quit crying." The Younger generation doesn't even know how to engage in civil discourse.

(09-25-2024 11:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

How bout 450 didn’t need to say or flap his lips with *anything* at the start? What a concept…. Lolz. I guess that initiator is lost on you. Lolz.

How about not getting buttmad over someone asking a simple question to you while standing in the check-out line at a grocery store? What a radical concept indeed.

(09-25-2024 11:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

How bout 450 didn’t need to say or flap his lips with *anything* at the start? What a concept…. Lolz. I guess that initiator is lost on you. Lolz.

the same could be said on this thread … #mindyourown … but it’s a bbs, Ja?!

you’re in the pickle barrel and like it…

(09-25-2024 11:58 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

How bout 450 didn’t need to say or flap his lips with *anything* at the start? What a concept…. Lolz. I guess that initiator is lost on you. Lolz.

How about not getting buttmad over someone asking a simple question in the check-out line at a grocery store? What a radical concept indeed.

Far from buttmad, Charlie. Sorry that pointing out that someone was acting like a pinhead antagonistic *******, and bragging about, seems pretty fing stupid.

About as fing stupid as the frenzy trying to whitewash the encounter.

Cool cool, champ.

(09-25-2024 11:58 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

How bout 450 didn’t need to say or flap his lips with *anything* at the start? What a concept…. Lolz. I guess that initiator is lost on you. Lolz.

the same could be said on this thread … #mindyourown … but it’s a bbs, Ja?!

you’re in the pickle barrel and like it…

Yep, I’m here. And I’m here without a full expectation, let alone any, that people who don’t agree with viewpoints get into the face of others. Here.

I don’t extend my actions to the line at HEB.

Kind of hard to equate a place that it is expected with some line in some store.

(09-25-2024 11:57 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:38 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 10:42 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 08:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Talking someone up in line is one thing.

Acting like an antagonistic aggressive ******* to someone in line based on a tee shirt is at the absolute extreme of talking someone up in line.

And there you go, making up crap on the go. You are nothing but a liar, some of us around here already know that.

Yeah, what 450 did wasn't even aggressive. He was just trying to make conversation.

Precisely. What kind of crybaby runs away because someone engages in conversation at a check out line?

I used to have a saying that I need to start using again: "Take the tampon out of your ass and quit crying." The Younger generation doesn't even know how to engage in civil discourse.

Bingo! +3

(09-25-2024 12:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:58 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

How bout 450 didn’t need to say or flap his lips with *anything* at the start? What a concept…. Lolz. I guess that initiator is lost on you. Lolz.

the same could be said on this thread … #mindyourown … but it’s a bbs, Ja?!

you’re in the pickle barrel and like it…

Yep, I’m here. And I’m here without a full expectation, let alone any, that people who don’t agree with viewpoints get into the face of others. Here.

I don’t extend my actions to the line at HEB.

Kind of hard to equate a place that it is expected with some line in some store.

hence, polysci wants a quacker and another lawfare-ism...

btw .... ref: post #14 ... https://csnbbs.com/thread-997583-post-19...id19765986

(09-25-2024 12:03 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:58 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

How bout 450 didn’t need to say or flap his lips with *anything* at the start? What a concept…. Lolz. I guess that initiator is lost on you. Lolz.

How about not getting buttmad over someone asking a simple question in the check-out line at a grocery store? What a radical concept indeed.

Far from buttmad, Charlie. Sorry that pointing out that someone was acting like a pinhead antagonistic *******, and bragging about, seems pretty fing stupid.

About as fing stupid as the frenzy trying to whitewash the encounter.

Cool cool, champ.

lol Thinking the buttmad statment was about you and not Kamala Shirt Dude is so typical of you. (Though in fairness, I can see how you took it that way since due to how I worded that so I fixed it to show that I meant Kamala Shirt Dude.) Okay. I'll bite. Wanting to have a discussion about politics is not being a pinhead antagonistic whatever you said. Besides, I'd venture to guess that Kamala Shirt Dude is "bragging" that he "got" both 450 and the black guy by flipping them off. But I guess that's okay because he's "the victim" in this scenario even though all 450 did was ask him why he was supporting Kamala. Oh, the humanity! THE PEARL CLUTCHING HUMANITY!

Cry me a river.

Do you know why a dog has so many friends?

Because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.

(09-25-2024 12:19 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Do you know why a dog has so many friends?

Because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.

LOL, good one, I'll have to remember that.

(09-25-2024 12:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:58 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-25-2024 11:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Considering the guy could've just said "agree to disagree" and let it go, yes. Instead, he chose to flip off both 450 and the black guy in question and leave to go to another check out station. Kinda like how this one student who was trying to debate Charlie Kirk at a college campus in North Carolina said "**** you. Your face is small." to Kirk when he (the student) loss the argument about modern segregation and critical race theory. Kamala Shirt Dude lost the argument to both 450 and the black guy, but instead of letting it go or even "agree to disagree" he chose to "try to put them in their place" and flipped them off.

So again, who's the snowflake here and why is it the Kamala Shirt Dude? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air. Thanks.

How bout 450 didn’t need to say or flap his lips with *anything* at the start? What a concept…. Lolz. I guess that initiator is lost on you. Lolz.

the same could be said on this thread … #mindyourown … but it’s a bbs, Ja?!

you’re in the pickle barrel and like it…

Yep, I’m here. And I’m here without a full expectation, let alone any, that people who don’t agree with viewpoints get into the face of others. Here.

I don’t extend my actions to the line at HEB.

Kind of hard to equate a place that it is expected with some line in some store.

"get into the face of others"

See there you go, telling another lie because you are losing the case.
You just can't help yourself.

(09-25-2024 09:49 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-24-2024 07:09 PM)450bench Wrote:  lol. I asked a guy (sort of) in a camel toe shirt a question in line at the store. Thought it was interesting and shared it here.

I guess it triggered a goober who likes to argue. I think that’s as funny as the actual event at the store.



A Trump win could REALLY inspire some gems from this guy.

“Skyscreamer on isle 11, Irv. Skyscreamer on isle 11.”

No doubt. I mean, if a couple of random stories trigger him like this, just imagine what's coming on November 6th if Trump wins.

Like a stray cat in Springfield, he be gone.