(08-25-2024 06:10 PM)450bench Wrote:  Trumps been right about just about everything and liberal hacks have been consistently wrong…I’ll take Trump.

Im sure you would. Lolz. I guess being inquisitive about that stark of a difference doesn’t make an entrance into that just about only limbic level thought process you so proudly show off.

Have a great evening, My Friend.

(08-25-2024 05:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 02:51 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  That leaves out all of tanq’s posts

Brevity is the soul of wit. He doesn’t realize no body wants to read all that bullchit.

I dont read his posts. I pick up a few words, whatt will piss him off and egg him on the most, respond in a manner that trigger his pea brain, then check in and snicker at him later.

2nd or 3rd easiest ever. Nothing easier than a nimrod that thinks he is clever. Id feel guilty if he wasnt such s pompos ass. You really got him if he cals youndone ghey pet name like ",sparkles,". That gets him off

Lets see what we get from the dumbest frick ever to attend Rice. So essy. Yeah dont actuall read his nonsense.

(08-25-2024 08:02 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 05:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 02:51 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  That leaves out all of tanq’s posts

Brevity is the soul of wit. He doesn’t realize no body wants to read all that bullchit.

I dont read his postd. I pick up a few words, ehat eill piss him off and egg him on the most, respond in s manner that trigger his pea brain, then check in and snicker at whim

2nd or 3rd easiest ever. Nothing easier than a nimrod that thinks he is clever. Id feel guilty if he wasnt such s pompos ass.

Lets see what we get from the dumbest frick ever to sttend Rice.

Being a shallow ass fk is precisely what I expect from you. Thx for confirming. You be you tigger boy. Or more for you: Yeee-haw festus!!!

(08-25-2024 08:05 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 08:02 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 05:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 02:51 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  That leaves out all of tanq’s posts

Brevity is the soul of wit. He doesn’t realize no body wants to read all that bullchit.

I dont read his postd. I pick up a few words, ehat eill piss him off and egg him on the most, respond in s manner that trigger his pea brain, then check in and snicker at whim

2nd or 3rd easiest ever. Nothing easier than a nimrod that thinks he is clever. Id feel guilty if he wasnt such s pompos ass.

Lets see what we get from the dumbest frick ever to sttend Rice.

Being a shallow ass fk is precisely what I expect from you. Thx for confirming. You be you tigger boy.

Im sorry you are stupid, bombastic, boring and usually wrong.

Bwahahahahahaha. There it is the little ghey love..word..

Weirdo

IMHO, Tanq has a point. If Trump is citing the increase in violent crime with statistics - and the actual government statistics (FBI, DOJ, or any Fed crime statistics) don't agree with Trump's statements - then that's a legitimate problem. Tell us where he's getting his numbers, or if his numbers are not cited anywhere but they have data analysis that reasonably shows crime is increasing (either by intentional underreporting or whatever) then that should be explained better.

I've not looked at the statistics myself. Also haven't heard Trump's actual crime statistics. However, I personally believe crime has increased significantly IN SOME AREAS. Look at the businesses moving out of San Francisco and Oakland and the reasons they provided...theft that is not being investigated let alone being prosecuted being prominent.

Also, perhaps the major spikes in crime aren't violent where people are injured or killed but in reality theft and property damage.

(08-25-2024 10:31 PM)miko33 Wrote:  IMHO, Tanq has a point. If Trump is citing the increase in violent crime with statistics - and the actual government statistics (FBI, DOJ, or any Fed crime statistics) don't agree with Trump's statements - then that's a legitimate problem. Tell us where he's getting his numbers, or if his numbers are not cited anywhere but they have data analysis that reasonably shows crime is increasing (either by intentional underreporting or whatever) then that should be explained better.

I've not looked at the statistics myself. Also haven't heard Trump's actual crime statistics. However, I personally believe crime has increased significantly IN SOME AREAS. Look at the businesses moving out of San Francisco and Oakland and the reasons they provided...theft that is not being investigated let alone being prosecuted being prominent.

Also, perhaps the major spikes in crime aren't violent where people are injured or killed but in reality theft and property damage.

Please read Post #86 in this thread. Almost everybody has ignored it. It answers some questions on this topic.

(08-25-2024 07:51 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 06:06 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 04:06 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 03:44 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 01:56 PM)boss man Wrote:  HERE IS THE PROBLEM WITH THE BS STATS PROVIDED TO THE FBI:

FBI Stats Show Plunge in Violent Crime, But There's a Catch

“In a statement provided to Newsweek, the FBI said: "Participation in the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program is voluntary. The accuracy of the statistics released by the FBI's UCR Program is based on data contributors' participation and adherence to national standards.

Some of this data may not be comparable to previous years because of differing levels of participation over time," the statement added.”

IOW, it is not apples to apples. This is more like pineapples to raisins.

Good Post Bossman, I was wondering when someone was going to bring up this Fact about the numbers that the fbi receive.

Still doesnt address the issue of my post -- does it?

Trump Barfed up really stupid crime numbers. Cited 'government statistics'.

The 'government statistics' dont show that level of crime, and they show the opposite (i.e. they decreased).

Maybe try and find numbers to back up Trump's barf.

That doesnt seem to compute with you. Imagine that.

Wrong again sport, what you're trying to do is tell everyone that the FBI statistics on crime are all that needs to be heard.

They are enough to show a sharp problem between the world according to Trump speak and real world. Trump: +89%. FBI: -12%.

I guess you didn’t catch that on the first read through.

Quote:What you have as far as the FBI, is that their statistics are incomplete. They don't have all the numbers now do they. Maybe Trump was also using local government statistics and not the ones from our federal government.

Nope. He also referenced his numbers as national.

Strike 2.

I’d like to see where he pulled those numbers from. They are at stark odds with all of the national statistics for that period.

If he’s using valid stats, and someone can show those stats from a valid source —. I will readily admit them.

Or please keep flailing and fishing for us.

Sorry sport, you are wrong again.

(08-25-2024 11:45 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 07:51 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 06:06 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 04:06 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 03:44 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  Good Post Bossman, I was wondering when someone was going to bring up this Fact about the numbers that the fbi receive.

Still doesnt address the issue of my post -- does it?

Trump Barfed up really stupid crime numbers. Cited 'government statistics'.

The 'government statistics' dont show that level of crime, and they show the opposite (i.e. they decreased).

Maybe try and find numbers to back up Trump's barf.

That doesnt seem to compute with you. Imagine that.

Wrong again sport, what you're trying to do is tell everyone that the FBI statistics on crime are all that needs to be heard.

They are enough to show a sharp problem between the world according to Trump speak and real world. Trump: +89%. FBI: -12%.

I guess you didn’t catch that on the first read through.

Quote:What you have as far as the FBI, is that their statistics are incomplete. They don't have all the numbers now do they. Maybe Trump was also using local government statistics and not the ones from our federal government.

Nope. He also referenced his numbers as national.

Strike 2.

I’d like to see where he pulled those numbers from. They are at stark odds with all of the national statistics for that period.

If he’s using valid stats, and someone can show those stats from a valid source —. I will readily admit them.

Or please keep flailing and fishing for us.

Sorry sport, you are wrong again.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/a...ow-we-know

(08-25-2024 10:48 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 10:31 PM)miko33 Wrote:  IMHO, Tanq has a point. If Trump is citing the increase in violent crime with statistics - and the actual government statistics (FBI, DOJ, or any Fed crime statistics) don't agree with Trump's statements - then that's a legitimate problem. Tell us where he's getting his numbers, or if his numbers are not cited anywhere but they have data analysis that reasonably shows crime is increasing (either by intentional underreporting or whatever) then that should be explained better.

I've not looked at the statistics myself. Also haven't heard Trump's actual crime statistics. However, I personally believe crime has increased significantly IN SOME AREAS. Look at the businesses moving out of San Francisco and Oakland and the reasons they provided...theft that is not being investigated let alone being prosecuted being prominent.

Also, perhaps the major spikes in crime aren't violent where people are injured or killed but in reality theft and property damage.

Please read Post #86 in this thread. Almost everybody has ignored it. It answers some questions on this topic.

I'm aware of post #86. However, are other people who are interested in the elections and not participants on this board aware of it? That's my point. He can't simply state that this type or that type of crime has increased by X% if the data doesn't show it. Even if he's 100% correct and the data has been manipulated, it won't matter if what he is saying can't be shown quickly and easily.

Put another way. If he's citing statistics but people are countering his claims with the FBI statistics - assuming they were manipulated - he has to be prepared to show why this data should be trusted and not the FBI data or simply broadcast how the FBI data is misleading.

i see the guy who got caught using Legal AI is back spamming again, the Valor Stealer too

(08-25-2024 07:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 06:10 PM)450bench Wrote:  Trumps been right about just about everything and liberal hacks have been consistently wrong…I’ll take Trump.

Im sure you would. Lolz. I guess being inquisitive about that stark of a difference doesn’t make an entrance into that just about only limbic level thought process you so proudly show off.

Have a great evening, My Friend.

Again, Trump’s usually right. In fact, when it comes to this kinda thing, he’s almost always PROVEN right. Shills, such as yourself, don’t have the sack to admit it.
When things don’t trend your way, you disappear. Clearly you just can’t take it, which is interesting since you’re the most lampooned poster here. You should be used to it.

And I’m not your friend, Ace.

(08-25-2024 10:31 PM)miko33 Wrote:  IMHO, Tanq has a point. If Trump is citing the increase in violent crime with statistics - and the actual government statistics (FBI, DOJ, or any Fed crime statistics) don't agree with Trump's statements - then that's a legitimate problem. Tell us where he's getting his numbers, or if his numbers are not cited anywhere but they have data analysis that reasonably shows crime is increasing (either by intentional underreporting or whatever) then that should be explained better.

I've not looked at the statistics myself. Also haven't heard Trump's actual crime statistics. However, I personally believe crime has increased significantly IN SOME AREAS. Look at the businesses moving out of San Francisco and Oakland and the reasons they provided...theft that is not being investigated let alone being prosecuted being prominent.

Also, perhaps the major spikes in crime aren't violent where people are injured or killed but in reality theft and property damage.

We don’t believe the government numbers. Is that our fault? Should we just accept government numbers that make our brow rise? They are getting the exact reaction they deserve. Disbelief.

Now arguing with idiots makes no sense. They will and have believed all of the bullchit they have been fed. Tanq isn’t alone in believing what he wants to believe. Had the BoL numbers been discussed in the spring I’m sure he would have been right there calling everyone Sparkles.

(08-26-2024 08:08 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 10:31 PM)miko33 Wrote:  IMHO, Tanq has a point. If Trump is citing the increase in violent crime with statistics - and the actual government statistics (FBI, DOJ, or any Fed crime statistics) don't agree with Trump's statements - then that's a legitimate problem. Tell us where he's getting his numbers, or if his numbers are not cited anywhere but they have data analysis that reasonably shows crime is increasing (either by intentional underreporting or whatever) then that should be explained better.

I've not looked at the statistics myself. Also haven't heard Trump's actual crime statistics. However, I personally believe crime has increased significantly IN SOME AREAS. Look at the businesses moving out of San Francisco and Oakland and the reasons they provided...theft that is not being investigated let alone being prosecuted being prominent.

Also, perhaps the major spikes in crime aren't violent where people are injured or killed but in reality theft and property damage.

We don’t believe the government numbers. Is that our fault? Should we just accept government numbers that make our brow rise? They are getting the exact reaction they deserve. Disbelief.

Now arguing with idiots makes no sense. They will and have believed all of the bullchit they have been fed. Tanq isn’t alone in believing what he wants to believe. Had the BoL numbers been discussed in the spring I’m sure he would have been right there calling everyone Sparkles.

I simply want to see the source of Trumps, for example, +89% rise in rape. The rest of the world of published stats show not just a difference, they show actual *decrease* in those crimes.

The FBI numbers may very well be off. But there is *such* a MASSIVE difference between literally every published number and Trump's claims, I want to see Trump's sources.

Wanting to see Trump's sources, or for that matter see *any* source that even comes *anywhere* close to Trump's numbers, seems to be a massive problem for some, interestingly.

The mass of statistics, from the published statistics, simply dont match Trumps grandiose numbers. Ill be open minded and accept that there *might* be a massive error on the world of those published statistics and that Trumps numbers *might* be anywhere near the correct statement. But those numbers that back Trump's grandiose statements dont seem to be hanging around.

(08-26-2024 07:59 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 07:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-25-2024 06:10 PM)450bench Wrote:  Trumps been right about just about everything and liberal hacks have been consistently wrong…I’ll take Trump.

Im sure you would. Lolz. I guess being inquisitive about that stark of a difference doesn’t make an entrance into that just about only limbic level thought process you so proudly show off.

Have a great evening, My Friend.

Again, Trump’s usually right. In fact, when it comes to this kinda thing, he’s almost always PROVEN right. Shills, such as yourself, don’t have the sack to admit it.
When things don’t trend your way, you disappear. Clearly you just can’t take it, which is interesting since you’re the most lampooned poster here. You should be used to it.

And I’m not your friend, Ace.

Then where are the numbers that back his claims? Funny that they simply dont seem to exist. Interesting that.

If the numbers exist, I will readily admit them. But leave it to a meathead to jump up and down and act like a whirling dervish and say the opposite.

Have a great day, My Friend.

(08-24-2024 11:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  
Vice President Kamala Harris’ nomination acceptance speech Thursday drew an average of 28.9 million viewers across cable television, according to Nielsen ratings — about 500,000 more viewers than tuned in to hear former President Donald Trump at the Republican convention.

Over 26 million viewers watched the fourth night of Democratic National Convention programming overall, including 6.7 million viewers in the coveted 18-54-year-old demographic, Nielsen said. The DNC also drew about an average of 3 million more viewers than last month’s RNC over the four nights — averaging 21.8 million viewers, compared to the RNC’s average of 18.9 million viewers.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/23...p-00176254

I am skipping all seven pages of responses.... and will summarize.


Who cares?