womp womp

Even thought the DOJ will have to pay with OUR money at least it'll make them look bad when they have to divvy up. I wonder how of the Commie press will even put it out in their programs?

He'll win, you watch.

Too funny that the OP thinks this will go anywhere.

(08-12-2024 12:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Too funny that the OP thinks this will go anywhere.

What does it matter?
Will it get farther than a bullchit falsifying business records case? Or a libel case based on absolutely no facts? We will just have to wait and see won’t we.

Love it. A weaponized DOJ will have to realize they could get sued.

If there are no consequences, they keep doing it. Misbehaving children need consequences.

(08-12-2024 02:36 PM)bullet Wrote:  Love it. A weaponized DOJ will have to realize they could get sued.

If there are no consequences, they keep doing it. Misbehaving government criminals need consequences to be extreme.

FIFY

(08-12-2024 02:36 PM)bullet Wrote:  Love it. A weaponized DOJ will have to realize they could get sued.

If there are no consequences, they keep doing it. Misbehaving children need consequences.

Only if they go after the individuals.

No, I haven’t read up on this. Hopefully that will be part of the suit. Go after the failed JackAzz.

Local news mentioned it and the anchor, with no source, says very in a very authoritative tone, the suit has little chance to succeed.

(08-12-2024 02:36 PM)bullet Wrote:  Love it. A weaponized DOJ will have to realize they could get sued.

If there are no consequences, they keep doing it. Misbehaving children need consequences.

Anybody can get sued at any time, for any thing. See -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta..._His_Staff

That doesn't mean said lawsuit will be successful. And misbehaving children do need consequences, Trump is due for his first serving in November at the ballot box. And as Madam Vice President says, the rest will be up to the courts.

Is it a Section 1983 claim? If so, attorneys are putting it in 1st gear and driving cross country.

(08-13-2024 08:33 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  

(08-12-2024 02:36 PM)bullet Wrote:  Love it. A weaponized DOJ will have to realize they could get sued.

If there are no consequences, they keep doing it. Misbehaving children need consequences.

Anybody can get sued at any time, for any thing. See -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta..._His_Staff

That doesn't mean said lawsuit will be successful. And misbehaving children do need consequences, Trump is due for his first serving in November at the ballot box. And as Madam Vice President says, the rest will be up to the courts.

The Appeals Court or Supreme Court will have to be the adults and punish the clown judges and prosecutors going after President Trump for political reasons. Some of these will be 9-0 for Trump if they go to the Supreme Court (NY business case and NY imaginary 35 felonies case). Even Sotomayor and Jackson will favor basic defendants' rights over politics.

(08-13-2024 08:50 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Is it a Section 1983 claim? If so, attorneys are putting it in 1st gear and driving cross country.

I suspect this is the first salvo, and they did it quickly in order to force preservation of records.

The FBI emails attached to the lawsuit show lower level FBI agents infuriated that they would use lawfare the way they did. That in of itself points to selective prosecution within the FBI/DOJ, which is what this first case is built on. That way, it cant be immediately dismissed for lack of evidence. The FBI is internally admitting they did it.