Good grief, is there even ONE Democrat anywhere in this country that understands the difference between an AR-15 and a weapon of war? Troops have select fire rifles, which means you can shoot automatic (one trigger pull empties the entire magazine) or semi-automatic (one pull equals one bullet).

BIG freaking difference. Just because an AR-15 LOOKS like an Army issue, it is NOT. They know the difference. At least some of them do. Lying bastards.

A freaking semi-auto AR-15 is no different from any other semi-auto rifle or pistol used for hunting, target shooting, self-defense, etc. One trigger pull, one bullet.

(08-09-2024 08:48 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Good grief, is there even ONE Democrat anywhere in this country that understands the difference between an AR-15 and a weapon of war? Troops have select fire rifles, which means you can shoot automatic (one trigger pull empties the entire magazine) or semi-automatic (one pull equals one bullet).

BIG freaking difference. Just because an AR-15 LOOKS like an Army issue, it is NOT. They know the difference. At least some of them do. Lying bastards.

A freaking semi-auto AR-15 is no different from any other semi-auto rifle or pistol used for hunting, target shooting, self-defense, etc. One trigger pull, one bullet.

They don't care about factual reality when they can create their own. When they use terms like assault rifle it riles their base. That's all they care about.

(08-09-2024 08:52 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-09-2024 08:48 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Good grief, is there even ONE Democrat anywhere in this country that understands the difference between an AR-15 and a weapon of war? Troops have select fire rifles, which means you can shoot automatic (one trigger pull empties the entire magazine) or semi-automatic (one pull equals one bullet).

BIG freaking difference. Just because an AR-15 LOOKS like an Army issue, it is NOT. They know the difference. At least some of them do. Lying bastards.

A freaking semi-auto AR-15 is no different from any other semi-auto rifle or pistol used for hunting, target shooting, self-defense, etc. One trigger pull, one bullet.

They don't care about factual reality when they can create their own. When they use terms like assault rifle it riles their base. That's all they care about.

I know. It was rhetorical. I had to get it off my chest. The leaders know the difference. Certainly Walz does. Liar. I bet Kamala doesn't, though.

Did anybody see the video of her being introduced to electric car charging? She held the electric plug like a gas hose, for several minutes, until her host finally told her she could let go of it.

She asked, "Well, how do I know it's charging?" What an idiot.

(08-09-2024 09:01 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-09-2024 08:52 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-09-2024 08:48 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Good grief, is there even ONE Democrat anywhere in this country that understands the difference between an AR-15 and a weapon of war? Troops have select fire rifles, which means you can shoot automatic (one trigger pull empties the entire magazine) or semi-automatic (one pull equals one bullet).

BIG freaking difference. Just because an AR-15 LOOKS like an Army issue, it is NOT. They know the difference. At least some of them do. Lying bastards.

A freaking semi-auto AR-15 is no different from any other semi-auto rifle or pistol used for hunting, target shooting, self-defense, etc. One trigger pull, one bullet.

They don't care about factual reality when they can create their own. When they use terms like assault rifle it riles their base. That's all they care about.

I know. It was rhetorical. I had to get it off my chest. The leaders know the difference. Certainly Walz does. Liar. I bet Kamala doesn't, though.

Did anybody see the video of her being introduced to electric car charging? She held the electric plug like a gas hose, for several minutes, until her host finally told her she could let go of it.

She asked, "Well, how do I know it's charging?" What an idiot.

To be fair, she also holds on to the plug in the wall when she turns her lamp on.

I think we are seeing the effects of a free twitter. Every other media outlet has been desperately trying to down play Walz's stolen valor, yet they still had to remove his fake rank and send out a letter saying he misspoke. Minnesota media has been successfully doing it for two decades.

By the way, how many people believe he was the head coach of a Minnesota high school football team that won a state championship? yep, not true. He was assistant coach. He was head coach of a freshman team in Nebraska until he got fired.

So now even their campaign admits he's a liar. .

When you misspeak, it's because it's something you failed to have enough information about. to make the statement you made...

When the topic is in fact you, it's not misspeaking, it's being a ******* liar.

(08-09-2024 08:37 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

Tampon Tim aka Minnesota Putz

CNN had his commander on to lay out the timeline. It didnt go like CNN thought it would.

1. He confirmed Walz knew he was getting deployed to Iraq 6 months prior to quitting.
2. Walz met with this commander and told him he would go to Iraq.
3. Walz then goes around his commander and tried to file for early retirement.
4. Commander is notified Walz quit. (CNN host hated this term btw)

So the CNN host's timeline she showed just prior to this interview blew up in her face. Walz did not "retire" before knowing he was going to Iraq. They knew. They had the warning notice for months before he pulled this deployment stunt.

CNN makes some truly dumb@ss mistakes that blow up in their scheming faces.

Walz is further exposed as an absolute rhino-faced b1tch that had no plans to actually go to a live war zone. Own your proven cowardice, Governor Walz!

Here's Walz giving his honest opinion of his military service:

Oh yeah, he lied and was caught. Sorrrrry!

NOW BACK TO OUR CURRENT LYING BULLSH!T !!!

(08-10-2024 09:23 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  CNN had his commander on to lay out the timeline. It didnt go like CNN thought it would.

1. He confirmed Walz knew he was getting deployed to Iraq 6 months prior to quitting.
2. Walz met with this commander and told him he would go to Iraq.
3. Walz then goes around his commander and tried to file for early retirement.
4. Commander is notified Walz quit. (CNN host hated this term btw)

So the CNN host's timeline she showed just prior to this interview blew up in her face. Walz did not "retire" before knowing he was going to Iraq. They knew. They had the warning notice for months before he pulled this deployment stunt.

Like I've said all week. He's a liar and a coward. No vet whe is not already a liberal is supporting that POS Pogue

Where is that Warweasel09 or whatever his name was liberal apologist dbag to admit I'm right?

hahahahahahahaha dayam....

This is what happens when you have your hack media continuously pushing back and lying for you. More and more people come out.

You know they are harassing anyone from that unit that he says was a decent dude to get them to come out in favor of him. When you see that start you know the internal polling says they are getting skull-drug on this issue. And they deserve to be skull-drug.

He's a lying POS weasel. She royally effed up the very first real decision she had to make as the nominee.

(08-10-2024 11:35 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  hahahahahahahaha dayam....

This is what happens when you have your hack media continuously pushing back and lying for you. More and more people come out.

about fk'n time what's left of any common sensei media get's mofo nasty with their career!

then for the shites and gigs side of the equation in 420 garb, you get the following ...

@can'tLaughEwe'reDead