Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Jim Boeheim reveals 'hardest part' for b-ball programs amid conference realignment
Author Message
Bear Catlett Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,994
Joined: Jan 2020
Reputation: 1547
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Jim Boeheim reveals 'hardest part' for b-ball programs amid conference realignment
(02-04-2024 04:15 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(02-04-2024 04:03 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  
(02-04-2024 03:10 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(02-04-2024 10:40 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  No grandpa Boeheim, the "hardest part" of realignment is trying to make the best of what's left after you get stabbed in the back by Pitt and Syracuse.

Didn't you guys stab the MAC and CUSA in the back too?

Yeah I don't remember us telling the MAC and CUSA to turn down a decent TV deal and then bolt the conference when ESPN blew it up.

Syracuse never was involved in that.

From Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%E2%...ealignment

At that time, speculation was rampant that the Big East might be able to attract a school from the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC), which was in the midst of negotiating a new media deal. However, according to one industry source, "At that point when the Big East was intact, the only schools the Big East could have legitimately added that made sense were UCF, Maryland, and Boston College; and those schools wouldn't even return the Big East's calls. But the Big East couldn't add UCF because Judy Genshaft [president of UCF’s in-state rival South Florida] kept shooting down UCF." A source within the conference added that Genshaft's insistence on keeping UCF out was a major contributing factor to the instability that would soon plague the Big East.[20]

The trigger for this instability proved to be the negotiations for a new television deal that took place in April 2011, when TCU was on board. Marinatto and the conference reached a nine-year, $1.4 billion deal and recommended that the conference presidents, who had the final say on the deal, accept it.[20] The presidents reportedly voted 12–4 to accept in a preliminary vote.[21] However, while the conference was going over the final details, the presidents had second thoughts upon learning of the deal that the Pac-12 had just reached with ESPN and Fox, reportedly worth $250 million annually, and in a second vote turned down the deal 16–0.[21] In May 2012, one Big East source told Brett McMurphy, then of CBSSports.com, that turning down the deal "was the stupidest decision ever made in college athletics. To have the equity of ESPN as your brand and the stability that would have gone with it." Another source added, "If the TV deal was accepted and UCF had been added, who knows if Pitt and Syracuse ever leave. Everyone left because of stability and right there was your stability with that TV deal."[20]

Dude, the BC AD at the time let the cat out of the bag. It was a hit job.
02-04-2024 09:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.