(12-23-2023 01:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-22-2023 04:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  When the DC Circuit makes their opinion on that fast track, Scotus will fast track then.

SCOTUS passed because the DC Circuit accepted the expedited review there with an extremely aggressive briefing and argument schedule.

Yet, you did read the dissent(s), correct?

Even a blind loya coulda seen this coming

Hack Jack, rebuffed yet again.

It’s like the wet nosed puppy you swat on the nose with a sports section and they come running back for more.

Over and over and over again.

Sorry HJ, not sorry you’re such a sorry loya. Try harder next time, maybe you can be a better baker or something?

There was no opinion, no dissent, and no explanation in the SCOTUS denial.

So no, I did not read the dissent(s) in the request for expedited review to SCOTUS.

Kind of puts an interesting color on the rest of your whiny ad hom stuff there, wouldnt you agree? What does one denote some dude slapping around comments as 'sorry loya' when they are simply referring to imaginary made up items (that is dissents that dont exist). Kind of a funny little slip up there pardner. Maybe reload the whine gun and try again with something more than blank rounds..... Just saying....

Its fairly obvious though, when the DC Circuit grants expedited review, the SCOTUS is probably not going to short circuit that act by the DC Circuit.

Maybe you can lend us your expert insight (including those imaginary dissents and all you refer to) on the matter.

(12-22-2023 10:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-22-2023 04:50 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-22-2023 04:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  When the DC Circuit makes their opinion on that fast track, Scotus will fast track then.

SCOTUS passed because the DC Circuit accepted the expedited review there with an extremely aggressive briefing and argument schedule.

or maybe b/c the CEO court rarely hears janitorial court decisions … #layMan

This issue will absolutely go to the Supreme Court. No doubt there.

100% agree ... however, ol' Jackie Boy is wanting to turn hopscotch into the long jump ... SCOTUS deservedly responds with, "piss off, Jack!" ... yeah, I can have fonzies with this, too ...

(12-23-2023 01:28 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 01:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-22-2023 04:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  When the DC Circuit makes their opinion on that fast track, Scotus will fast track then.

SCOTUS passed because the DC Circuit accepted the expedited review there with an extremely aggressive briefing and argument schedule.

Yet, you did read the dissent(s), correct?

Even a blind loya coulda seen this coming

Hack Jack, rebuffed yet again.

It’s like the wet nosed puppy you swat on the nose with a sports section and they come running back for more.

Over and over and over again.

Sorry HJ, not sorry you’re such a sorry loya. Try harder next time, maybe you can be a better baker or something?

There was no opinion, no dissent, and no explanation in the SCOTUS denial.

So no, I did not read the dissent(s) in the request for expedited review to SCOTUS.

Kind of puts an interesting color on the rest of your whiny ad hom stuff there, wouldnt you agree? What does one denote some dude slapping around comments as 'sorry loya' when they are simply referring to imaginary made up items (that is dissents that dont exist). Kind of a funny little slip up there pardner. Maybe reload the whine gun and try again with something more than blank rounds..... Just saying....

Its fairly obvious though, when the DC Circuit grants expedited review, the SCOTUS is probably not going to short circuit that act by the DC Circuit.

Maybe you can lend us your expert insight (including those imaginary and all you refer to) on the matter.

Somebody should, you sure in the hell havent

I dont really mindva dumbarse. I dont mind arrogance

An arrogant condescending dumbarse, they are the worst

Too stupid to be embarrassed by their on stupidity .

Sad, bigly

Seriously you have issues

(12-23-2023 01:28 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 01:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-22-2023 04:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  When the DC Circuit makes their opinion on that fast track, Scotus will fast track then.

SCOTUS passed because the DC Circuit accepted the expedited review there with an extremely aggressive briefing and argument schedule.

Yet, you did read the dissent(s), correct?

Even a blind loya coulda seen this coming

Hack Jack, rebuffed yet again.

It’s like the wet nosed puppy you swat on the nose with a sports section and they come running back for more.

Over and over and over again.

Sorry HJ, not sorry you’re such a sorry loya. Try harder next time, maybe you can be a better baker or something?

There was no opinion, no dissent, and no explanation in the SCOTUS denial.

So no, I did not read the dissent(s) in the request for expedited review to SCOTUS.

You didnt read anything about a dissent because THERE WAS NONE

Quote:Its fairly obvious though, when the DC Circuit grants expedited review, the SCOTUS is probably not going to short circuit that act by the DC Circuit.

Fairly obvious, as when you continuously bloviated about Trump's attorney not checking a jury trial box?

This is not a case where the supreme court is likely going to take it up, get oral arguments going, and make a decision in weeks.

(12-23-2023 10:25 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 01:28 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 01:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-22-2023 04:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  When the DC Circuit makes their opinion on that fast track, Scotus will fast track then.

SCOTUS passed because the DC Circuit accepted the expedited review there with an extremely aggressive briefing and argument schedule.

Yet, you did read the dissent(s), correct?

Even a blind loya coulda seen this coming

Hack Jack, rebuffed yet again.

It’s like the wet nosed puppy you swat on the nose with a sports section and they come running back for more.

Over and over and over again.

Sorry HJ, not sorry you’re such a sorry loya. Try harder next time, maybe you can be a better baker or something?

There was no opinion, no dissent, and no explanation in the SCOTUS denial.

So no, I did not read the dissent(s) in the request for expedited review to SCOTUS.

You didnt read anything about a dissent because THERE WAS NONE

Yep, what I said before your repeat. Learn to read sparkles.

Quote:

Quote:Its fairly obvious though, when the DC Circuit grants expedited review, the SCOTUS is probably not going to short circuit that act by the DC Circuit.

Fairly obvious, as when you continuously bloviated about Trump's attorney not checking a jury trial box?

This is not a case where the supreme court is likely going to take it up, get oral arguments going, and make a decision in weeks.

See the Nixon case, chuckles. Pretty much straight on same issues in the facts and in the setting of Presidential power stacked against a criminal proceeding against a President. From the filing of the appeal to opinion was 5 weeks, soup to nuts.

Or any one of the 8 or 9 expedited cases SCOTUS has done in the last few years. Thos that were so important to take as expedited dont hold a match to United States v. Trump. Not even close.

They will probably do this on an expedited basis.

As for the Habba f-up, she absolutely could have checked the box, and argued that portions of the fraud case should be done by a jury. She didnt even attempt to do that.

But that is a subtlety that you probably dont have a good grasp of undertaking anytime soon.

(12-23-2023 03:25 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 10:25 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 01:28 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 01:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-22-2023 04:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  When the DC Circuit makes their opinion on that fast track, Scotus will fast track then.

SCOTUS passed because the DC Circuit accepted the expedited review there with an extremely aggressive briefing and argument schedule.

Yet, you did read the dissent(s), correct?

Even a blind loya coulda seen this coming

Hack Jack, rebuffed yet again.

It’s like the wet nosed puppy you swat on the nose with a sports section and they come running back for more.

Over and over and over again.

Sorry HJ, not sorry you’re such a sorry loya. Try harder next time, maybe you can be a better baker or something?

There was no opinion, no dissent, and no explanation in the SCOTUS denial.

So no, I did not read the dissent(s) in the request for expedited review to SCOTUS.

You didnt read anything about a dissent because THERE WAS NONE

Yep, what I said before your repeat. Learn to read sparkles.

Quote:

Quote:Its fairly obvious though, when the DC Circuit grants expedited review, the SCOTUS is probably not going to short circuit that act by the DC Circuit.

Fairly obvious, as when you continuously bloviated about Trump's attorney not checking a jury trial box?

This is not a case where the supreme court is likely going to take it up, get oral arguments going, and make a decision in weeks.

See the Nixon case, chuckles. Pretty much straight on same issues in the facts and in the setting of Presidential power stacked against a criminal proceeding against a President. From the filing of the appeal to opinion was 5 weeks, soup to nuts.

Or any one of the 8 or 9 expedited cases SCOTUS has done in the last few years. Thos that were so important to take as expedited dont hold a match to United States v. Trump. Not even close.

They will probably do this on an expedited basis.

As for the Habba f-up, she absolutely could have checked the box, and argued that portions of the fraud case should be done by a jury. She didnt even attempt to do that.

But that is a subtlety that you probably dont have a good grasp of undertaking anytime soon.

I dont know why you insist on anything about a jury box. There is no box for a jury trial in that case. We have rubbed your nose in that pile a number of times, and you refuse to get it. Even after the judge had to go back on record and state that he was wrong.

But you do you, boo.

And the Nixon case isnt anywhere on the level of a presidential immunity case, chucknuts. The SC is not going to ramrod this thing through in days. Even if they expedite it, it will be a number of months at a minimum. So kiss the March 6 election interference trial date goodbye.

President Trump with a few words of sanity on the matter:

(12-23-2023 03:49 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 03:25 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 10:25 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 01:28 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 01:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Yet, you did read the dissent(s), correct?

Even a blind loya coulda seen this coming

Hack Jack, rebuffed yet again.

It’s like the wet nosed puppy you swat on the nose with a sports section and they come running back for more.

Over and over and over again.

Sorry HJ, not sorry you’re such a sorry loya. Try harder next time, maybe you can be a better baker or something?

There was no opinion, no dissent, and no explanation in the SCOTUS denial.

So no, I did not read the dissent(s) in the request for expedited review to SCOTUS.

You didnt read anything about a dissent because THERE WAS NONE

Yep, what I said before your repeat. Learn to read sparkles.

Quote:

Quote:Its fairly obvious though, when the DC Circuit grants expedited review, the SCOTUS is probably not going to short circuit that act by the DC Circuit.

Fairly obvious, as when you continuously bloviated about Trump's attorney not checking a jury trial box?

This is not a case where the supreme court is likely going to take it up, get oral arguments going, and make a decision in weeks.

See the Nixon case, chuckles. Pretty much straight on same issues in the facts and in the setting of Presidential power stacked against a criminal proceeding against a President. From the filing of the appeal to opinion was 5 weeks, soup to nuts.

Or any one of the 8 or 9 expedited cases SCOTUS has done in the last few years. Thos that were so important to take as expedited dont hold a match to United States v. Trump. Not even close.

They will probably do this on an expedited basis.

As for the Habba f-up, she absolutely could have checked the box, and argued that portions of the fraud case should be done by a jury. She didnt even attempt to do that.

But that is a subtlety that you probably dont have a good grasp of undertaking anytime soon.

I dont know why you insist on anything about a jury box. There is no box for a jury trial in that case. We have rubbed your nose in that pile a number of times, and you refuse to get it. Even after the judge had to go back on record and state that he was wrong.

Haba had every right, and opportunity to request a jury. Period.

She had every right and opportunity to argue via motion why a jury would be proper.

She did neither.

Whether it be by 'check the box', by 'written motion' or however you wish to phrase that request.

Again --- she didn't lift a fing finger to do that. Sorry, that is the fact if the matter. I guess *you* can't wrap your moronic brain around that.

She never attempted *anything*. And then complained when she didn't lift a finger. It's not that hard of a concept for most. You do you, pinhead.

Quote:And the Nixon case isnt anywhere on the level of a presidential immunity case, chucknuts.

Lolz. Sure thing, chuckles.

Quote:The SC is not going to ramrod this thing through in days. Even if they expedite it, it will be a number of months at a minimum. So kiss the March 6 election interference trial date goodbye.

I never said that Mar 6 would be preserved. Again, learn somebasic English comprehension skills. Lolz.

(12-23-2023 03:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  President Trump with a few words of sanity on the matter:

A sane person wouldn't label a crim8nal case as a lawsuit as a first. Given you label that mishmash of gruel as sanity -- I now see the issue with you.

(12-23-2023 05:31 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-23-2023 03:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  President Trump with a few words of sanity on the matter:

A sane person wouldn't label a crim8nal case as a lawsuit as a first. Given you label that mishmash of gruel as sanity -- I now see the issue with you.

(not) sorry again there, chiefy ... DJT framed it perfectly ... 'tis nothing but another of his FUs to the F-ewes (aka known as the "fuze") ...

don't ya love living thru the best silly season of all time?! ...