Ed Meese has filed in the Jack Smithy/Scotus case, telling Scotus that Jack Smith's appointment was illegal, as are anything coming from Jack Smith.

This would be an enormous blow to the DOJ.

#CommeCiCommeCa …

Not JoeJack! Tanq has already established he is a top shelf upstanding prosecutor. After all that’s why he was appointed. No one else with such a sterling record.

I’m having a ‘walking’ moment … (don’t ask what triggers me skull cap o’ tangents … Watson, I don’t have cluuuuueeee)

Margot Cleveland has read Meese's filing, and agrees with him. Jack Smith was not legally appointed special counsel.

Ed Meese is 92 years old. I’m very skeptical that he wrote this amici. Curious who actually did write it.

EDIT: okay, it was Jay Sekulow’s firm.
Not sure yet what to make of this, but will definitely read it.

(12-21-2023 02:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Margot Cleveland has read Meese's filing, and agrees with him. Jack Smith was not legally appointed special counsel.

neither was our local novella’d ‘adjudicator’ … I wouldn’t trade either for any other in the land o’ sadistic retribution…

#it’sGittin’CrunkedNow … me cods have found warmth …

@cyaInCourtHoney!

(12-21-2023 02:20 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Ed Meese is 92 years old. I’m very skeptical that he wrote this amici. Curious who actually did write it.

EDIT: okay, it was Jay Sekulow’s firm.
Not sure yet what to make of this, but will definitely read it.

‘That’ Edwin Meese?!?!? … bwhahahahahaha … I’m in the field trying to keep up…

(12-21-2023 02:20 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Ed Meese is 92 years old. I’m very skeptical that he wrote this amici. Curious who actually did write it.

EDIT: okay, it was Jay Sekulow’s firm.
Not sure yet what to make of this, but will definitely read it.

do ‘they’ ever write it? … serious question.

#Blinken

(12-21-2023 02:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  #Blinken

is that all the libtards have up to this point … sounds like more gin and s’mores are req’d…

Jack Smith Lacks Standing to File in the Supreme Court Because He is Only a Private Citizen

Quote:Private citizen Jack Smith lacks standing to petition the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari before judgement in United States v. Trump for the same reason I do. Jack Smith is in the eyes of the Supreme Court a private citizen not an officer of the United States. Standing issues need not be raised by the parties to a case nor can they be waived. The Supreme Court justices must address them sua sponte.

The Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon overlooked Leo Jaworski's lack of standing because, if one consults the briefs in that case, one will find that no party ever raised the issue. The Court cursorily assumed Jaworski was legally appointed without ever examining the issue raised by me, former Attorney General Ed Meese, and Professor Gary Lawson. We discuss this issue at length in Steven G. Calabresi & Gary Lawson, Why Robert Mueller's Appointment as Special Counsel Was Unlawful, 95 Notre Dame Law Review, 87, at pp. 118-125 (2019). The D.C. Circuit and District Courts have declined to readdress this issue because of erroneous precedent in the D.C. Circuit, which does not bind the Supreme Court, and in which the standing issue was never raised. See id., at 125-127.

A more recent D.C. Circuit and District Court affirmed the legality of Robert Muller's appointment without a sustained response to our argument that none of the statutes cited by the Justice Department in support of the legality of Robert Mueller's appointment. Jack Smith's case is a new case.

Standing issues never go away but may be raised at any point in any litigation. The fact of the matter is that everything Jack Smith has done as Special Counsel, since his appointment on November 18, 2022 has been unconstitutional and is null and void. Anyone now in jail, or subject to a plea bargain, with Jack Smith can ask to be released because Jack Smith is, in truth, a. private citizen. The judge in the Florida District Court classified documents case is under the jurisdiction of the 11th Circuit and is not bound by D.C. Circuit precedent. Any litigant in a case before her can argue that Jack Smith is not a lawfully appointed officer of the United States.

(12-21-2023 02:43 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-21-2023 02:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  #Blinken

is that all the libtards have up to this point … sounds like more gin and s’mores are req’d…

The OP has a prediction success rate of about 1%. And even that may be generous.

(12-21-2023 02:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-21-2023 02:43 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-21-2023 02:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  #Blinken

is that all the libtards have up to this point … sounds like more gin and s’mores are req’d…

The OP has a prediction success rate of about 1%. And even that may be generous.

All I have to do is to mumble a few words, and you will be squealing like Aiden in the senate chambers.

I wonder how the Commie press will spin this news. "They're attacking DEMOCRACY". It seems that's all they got. Prayers folks, we need prayers for our country that common sense will prevail and evil is sent where it deserves, to their daddy's domain, straight to hell and don't collect $200.

(12-21-2023 02:43 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-21-2023 02:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  #Blinken

is that all the libtards have up to this point … sounds like more gin and s’mores are req’d…

Seems like mostly silence right now. I’ll enjoy the days after Trump wins. You know the day? It’s when they all go on vacation until some chit head reporter claims Russia Russia Russia again.

(12-21-2023 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Ed Meese has filed in the Jack Smithy/Scotus case, telling Scotus that Jack Smith's appointment was illegal, as are anything coming from Jack Smith.

This would be an enormous blow to the DOJ.

That would be great!

(12-21-2023 02:20 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Ed Meese is 92 years old. I’m very skeptical that he wrote this amici. Curious who actually did write it.

EDIT: okay, it was Jay Sekulow’s firm.
Not sure yet what to make of this, but will definitely read it.

Levin was his Chief of Staff back in Reagan Admin.

Aside, my F-I-L is nearly 90 and I think he could probably still perform his surgeries. Sharp as a tack.

I've seen Meese speak, interview, something somewhat recently. He may not have physically written it, but I'd bet he had input, maybe even the original genisis of the brief. I can't imagine he'd have his name attached to something as the filer if he wasn't pretty deeply involved.

(12-21-2023 04:59 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-21-2023 02:20 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Ed Meese is 92 years old. I’m very skeptical that he wrote this amici. Curious who actually did write it.

EDIT: okay, it was Jay Sekulow’s firm.
Not sure yet what to make of this, but will definitely read it.

Levin was his Chief of Staff back in Reagan Admin.

Aside, my F-I-L is nearly 90 and I think he could probably still perform his surgeries. Sharp as a tack.

I've seen Meese speak, interview, something somewhat recently. He may not have physically written it, but I'd bet he had input, maybe even the original genisis of the brief. I can't imagine he'd have his name attached to something as the filer if he wasn't pretty deeply involved.

Well Dr. Debakey was still doing heart surgery well into his 90s. Writing legal briefs is not heart surgery.

so if it is not Jack Smith, do you think this stuff goes away? Pretty sure they have a depth chart.