(12-14-2023 11:19 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-14-2023 10:42 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  Under what direct evidence?

This still feels all “very subjective” similar to the phone call. Stupid.

Exactly. They don't have any. And they've been at this, for what, well over a year or more?

Didnt Hunter clear everything up in his house testimony yesterday?

(12-14-2023 11:44 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Well they do have a lot of money moving.

Where from?
Where to?
For what?

He won’t be impeached regardless of what comes out. You really think the GOP will vote in lockstep? And that’s assuming they actually find something that directly connects him to bribery or payment with proof.

This was the same mistake the left did with Trump, turn him into a victim/martyr which helps galvanize support when it’s unwarranted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(12-14-2023 08:56 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(12-14-2023 12:21 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Have House Repubs ever voted unanimously on any matter of importance before? Maybe, but I don't recall one. 221-212. Pure split. All Repubs yes. Might be a record, lol.

They did for the current Speaker.

Yeah. But with how many failed tries before that?

(12-14-2023 12:39 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-14-2023 08:56 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(12-14-2023 12:21 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Have House Repubs ever voted unanimously on any matter of importance before? Maybe, but I don't recall one. 221-212. Pure split. All Repubs yes. Might be a record, lol.

They did for the current Speaker.

Yeah. But with how many failed tries before that?

None for Johnson. When he was nominated, he was voted in unanimously on the first try.