No word on whether Rutgers has Iowa's playbook, or if it would actually matter even if they did.

(11-09-2023 01:25 PM)bryanw1995 Wrote:  No word on whether Rutgers has Iowa's playbook, or if it would actually matter even if they did.

Only 28? That's low. No doubt.

The ECU-Charlotte O/U a few weeks back should have been in the 20's, and it would have still been entirely too high.

Well you can see how things are trending in Iowa's last 5 gsmes

Iowa 26, MSU 16
Iowa 20, PUR 14
Iowa 15, Wisc 6
MINN 12, Iowa 10
Iowa 10, NW 7

Based on this trend, I predict

Iowa 9, Rut 6

(11-09-2023 01:57 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  The ECU-Charlotte O/U a few weeks back should have been in the 20's, and it would have still been entirely too high.

Since you mention ECU, they shed a little light on what happens when Harbaugh is not on the sidelines for Michigan and Michigan doesn't have the opponents play calling signals on handy 7-page laminates. How the mighty Michigan with its 10+ NFL Draft Picks only won that game 30-3 over god awful (1-8) ECU is puzzling to say the least.

More important information about Iowa's, er, difficulty scoring:

https://www.espn.com/sports-betting/stor...game-total