This doesn’t fit the lib narrative so the lib media has buried it.

One of a zillion ways libs are destroying every fiber of this country.

(11-09-2023 10:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 09:23 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 08:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2023 03:36 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-08-2023 11:40 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  No he's not... he is crafting his weasel-worded response to cover his tracks. I am going with something along the lines of "well, I never supported or defended X so and that means that I denounced it"... Or my other favorite, "well, I did speak out against it, but it was on another site forum".......

You may be right.

Although, when I've called him out in the past on similar things, he usually doesn't reply and hopes we'll forget about it.

No, you're all wrong, as usual.

I didn't reply because the point you think you're making, isn't. You don't have to show your outrage or post a comment ON EVERY EGREGIOUS ACT that ever occurs to be appalled or to be against that act.

So since I didn't post a reply on this incident, I suddenly don't care when any kids are killed? If you honestly believe that, GFY with the world's largest object.

Again, your words were "Doesn't blink when kids are murdered."

So if I use your "logic" ... since you haven't commented on every killed in America I can conclude that you don't blink when kids are murdered? Even you are smart enough to see that's just ridiculous.

Lastly, don't flatter yourself silly sycophant...I have you on ignore so I don't even see the bulk of your moronic posts. So I don't always reply because you're usually just not worthy of discourse. Has nothing to do with you remembering something or not. Oops.

Well, I called that reply....



The other thread got locked down I did want to make one final reply.

Yes I am fully aware that the R's are pulling the same card the Dems are using with Trump by doing the Biden subpoenas.

But yet again, you are on all the Trump in court threads defending, supporting, and arguing for those court proceedings. So you are OK with the Dem's pulling this stunt on Trump, but not the Rep's on Biden?

You called what reply? The dude is making a ridiculous argument that I didn't need to respond to whatsoever. It's really just a lame troll when you get down to it. You have to know that.

But on trump v. Biden, you're comparing apples and oranges. There's plenty of evidence against trump. The stuff they've put out so far on the Biden's is "evidence" of nothing illegal. It's money paybacks for loans, etc. while Biden was a private citizen with nothing showing Biden was influenced then as VP or now as President. So unless that changes any time in the foreseeable future, I will continue to call Comer, and Jordan, et. al. out.

(11-09-2023 10:41 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But on trump v. Biden, you're comparing apples and oranges. There's plenty of evidence against trump. The stuff they've put out so far on the Biden's is "evidence" of nothing illegal. It's money paybacks for loans, etc. while Biden was a private citizen with nothing showing Biden was influenced then as VP or now as President. So unless that changes any time in the foreseeable future, I will continue to call Comer, and Jordan, et. al. out.

You really typed that?

Yup. There is no evidence of anything illegal against Joe Biden yet. N O N E. I understand that doesn't fit your narrative, but it's just the truth.

Comer has been asked time and time again. He has not shown anything illegal yet.

Just proves what we already knew; there is no depth to which you will not sink to defend the indefensible, if it suits your narrative.

You wouldn't know truth if it walked up and knocked your teeth out.

If they had the evidence, schmoe, the impeachment would be well underway.

They. Have. Not. Shown. It. (yet)

You can rant and rave all your want about depths, and defenses, and narratives. I will not defend Biden in any way if actual evidence is brought forth. Said this since Day 1.

(11-09-2023 10:50 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:21 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:19 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  You really typed that?

it's comedy gold...

There's absolutely no way he doesn't see the hypocrisy in what he wrote. Only blind partisanship can result in that line of reasoning.

Dude, you're the partisan hack here if believe that anything Comer or Jordan has brought forth is evidence of some crime committed by Joe Biden or evidence of any policy influenced as either VP or president.

Granted, that evidence may magically appear at some point in the future, but to date, is simply does not exist.

Maybe, but if recent history is any indicator, none of that is to be believed. It simply amazes me the left cannot apply the same reasoning that finds Trump guilty of everything to POTUS. The left needs no actual evidence of Trump's guilt, but must have it for the Biden family? It's nothing by partisan hypocrisy. It really is that simple.

Wait, you just typed "hypocrisy" that the left needs no evidence of trump's guilt when the collective right needs no evidence of Biden's guilt?!? WTF? C'mon man!

(11-09-2023 11:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:41 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But on trump v. Biden, you're comparing apples and oranges. There's plenty of evidence against trump. The stuff they've put out so far on the Biden's is "evidence" of nothing illegal. It's money paybacks for loans, etc. while Biden was a private citizen with nothing showing Biden was influenced then as VP or now as President. So unless that changes any time in the foreseeable future, I will continue to call Comer, and Jordan, et. al. out.

You really typed that?

Yup. There is no evidence of anything illegal against Joe Biden yet. N O N E. I understand that doesn't fit your narrative, but it's just the truth.

Comer has been asked time and time again. He has not shown anything illegal yet.

Just proves what we already knew; there is no depth to which you will not sink to defend the indefensible, if it suits your narrative.

You wouldn't know truth if it walked up and knocked your teeth out.

If they had the evidence, schmoe, the impeachment would be well underway.

They. Have. Not. Shown. It. (yet)

You can rant and rave all your want about depths, and defenses, and narratives. I will not defend Biden in any way if actual evidence is brought forth. Said this since Day 1.

And I don't believe you.

What is your strange fascination with calling people names, by the way?

Well Tom is a known liar

(11-09-2023 11:58 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 11:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:41 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 10:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  You really typed that?

Yup. There is no evidence of anything illegal against Joe Biden yet. N O N E. I understand that doesn't fit your narrative, but it's just the truth.

Comer has been asked time and time again. He has not shown anything illegal yet.

Just proves what we already knew; there is no depth to which you will not sink to defend the indefensible, if it suits your narrative.

You wouldn't know truth if it walked up and knocked your teeth out.

If they had the evidence, schmoe, the impeachment would be well underway.

They. Have. Not. Shown. It. (yet)

You can rant and rave all your want about depths, and defenses, and narratives. I will not defend Biden in any way if actual evidence is brought forth. Said this since Day 1.

And I don't believe you.

What is your strange fascination with calling people names, by the way?

Just a habit. Sorry. You're not one of the ones I should be using it on. Please accept my apologies. I don't know that it's all that strange around here. You may not notice, but I get called quite a lot of names here.

Well then, when the evidence does appear and I don't, then you can deride me until the cows come home, deal?

(11-09-2023 11:59 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Well Tom is a known liar

Pfft. Don't lie about anything here, liar.

My honesty and openness actually gets me in WAY more trouble.

(11-09-2023 12:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 11:59 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Well Tom is a known liar

Pfft. Don't lie about anything here, liar.

My honesty and openness actually gets me in WAY more trouble.

Can't. Stop. Laughing!

(11-09-2023 12:24 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 12:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 11:59 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Well Tom is a known liar

Pfft. Don't lie about anything here, liar.

My honesty and openness actually gets me in WAY more trouble.

Can't. Stop. Laughing!

Like a lot of people with mental stability issues. You really need to seek professional help.

Tom's responses in summation........


"I'm Rubber, you're glue

Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you

Where's my blankie"

Nanner......nanner..... nanner

(11-09-2023 03:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 12:24 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 12:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2023 11:59 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Well Tom is a known liar

Pfft. Don't lie about anything here, liar.

My honesty and openness actually gets me in WAY more trouble.

Can't. Stop. Laughing!

Like a lot of people with mental stability issues. You really need to seek professional help.

If laughing at your dumb arse makes me mentally unstable, then guilty as charged.

No offense. I don't mean this to sound hateful. But...you really are an idiot.

I disagree. He’s not that smart.