(09-28-2023 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 06:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 04:14 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 12:12 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Ok.. Dumb question... How is handling a pistol at a gun show by a person that's been indicted a crime?

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi...uncard.pdf

922(n) -- makes the receipt of a firearm by a person who is indicted for a crime having a sentence greater than one year a felony offense.

The word isnt 'own', it isnt 'possess', the wording is 'receipt by'.

That is, if you are under indictment for a crime having a sentence of 1 year and 1 day, or longer, and your brother hands you a shotgun to go dove hunting, and you even as much as carry it --- that is a violation.

Do I think it should be charged? No.

But a serious dumfk action by Trump and his folks. Yeah, lets gin up support by the 2A crowd, and have a picture of him violating the law and violating the terms of his bail agreements all in one fell swoop. Fing brilliant move.

But this is the dumb*** that bragged to some journalists about him having Top Secret papers in his hand, and telling them he cant let them see them because he cant declassify them --- all the while spouting that he has declassified them as some dumb*** defense move.

The same dumb*** that goes on TV and tells everyone that the documents in question are 'all mine' and that they should all be given back to him.

Let's take the part out after the "Do I think it should be charged? No"

We agree. I as a non-lawyer interprets "receipt of the firearm" means he's legally taken possession or came into possession by some type of illegal means, not handling it at a store or gun show. That's just me.

Everything past that I won't comment on as we've hashed that in other posts. I feel like I know your stance on Trump, you're not a fan.

Possession requires ownership and/or control.

'Receive' (from Oxford) --- 'to take into one's hands or one's possession'.

Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

(09-28-2023 06:48 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 04:35 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 04:11 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 03:00 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 01:59 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Again, I dont give a rats ass if he is punished for this.

I have lost track of how many times you've lied or been deceitful in your semantic gymnastics. But, add this one to the list.

You don't care?!?

Please show me where I support charging him for this, chuckles. Ive simply stated what the actual law is, and pointed out the collective excuses arent really good.

I simply find your explanations to be half-assed and wrong. Watching the collective gymnastics to get around the issue are classic.

lets look at the collective pile of crap you all have put forth ---

'He has to be convicted' -- nope.
'He has to own the gun' -- nope.
blah blah blah blah --- none of which have anything to do with the actual statute.

Your own dumb*** statements really add to flavor. You might be an impact if you could do more than blather generalized garbage about 'sham political prosecution' (when there is no charge), then ramble for eternity when you dont seem to understand that everything that is happening to Trump isnt put into place by "his completely corrupt political opponents."

Especially enlightening when you cant answer a single question I put to you, and whine about me being obtuse and dishonest. Kind of amazing to me.

But please continue there, chuckles. Lolz.

Posting all day on the topic, to random strangers on the internet, and you don't care?

You're so eat up with Trump, that you're going back and forth with someone you call "chuckles"!

His act was kind of cute at first, it's gotten so tedious that I can't take his running commentary on anything Trump any longer. Hell, he makes Tom look like a guy I could have a beer with and not be bored to tears by.

Anyone who can't stop himself from running on at the mouth over one person isn't someone to be taken seriously.

Well said and totally agree.

(09-28-2023 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 06:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 04:14 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 12:12 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Ok.. Dumb question... How is handling a pistol at a gun show by a person that's been indicted a crime?

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi...uncard.pdf

922(n) -- makes the receipt of a firearm by a person who is indicted for a crime having a sentence greater than one year a felony offense.

The word isnt 'own', it isnt 'possess', the wording is 'receipt by'.

That is, if you are under indictment for a crime having a sentence of 1 year and 1 day, or longer, and your brother hands you a shotgun to go dove hunting, and you even as much as carry it --- that is a violation.

Do I think it should be charged? No.

But a serious dumfk action by Trump and his folks. Yeah, lets gin up support by the 2A crowd, and have a picture of him violating the law and violating the terms of his bail agreements all in one fell swoop. Fing brilliant move.

But this is the dumb*** that bragged to some journalists about him having Top Secret papers in his hand, and telling them he cant let them see them because he cant declassify them --- all the while spouting that he has declassified them as some dumb*** defense move.

The same dumb*** that goes on TV and tells everyone that the documents in question are 'all mine' and that they should all be given back to him.

Let's take the part out after the "Do I think it should be charged? No"

We agree. I as a non-lawyer interprets "receipt of the firearm" means he's legally taken possession or came into possession by some type of illegal means, not handling it at a store or gun show. That's just me.

Everything past that I won't comment on as we've hashed that in other posts. I feel like I know your stance on Trump, you're not a fan.

Possession requires ownership and/or control.

'Receive' (from Oxford) --- 'to take into one's hands or one's possession'.

Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

(09-28-2023 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 06:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 04:14 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi...uncard.pdf

922(n) -- makes the receipt of a firearm by a person who is indicted for a crime having a sentence greater than one year a felony offense.

The word isnt 'own', it isnt 'possess', the wording is 'receipt by'.

That is, if you are under indictment for a crime having a sentence of 1 year and 1 day, or longer, and your brother hands you a shotgun to go dove hunting, and you even as much as carry it --- that is a violation.

Do I think it should be charged? No.

But a serious dumfk action by Trump and his folks. Yeah, lets gin up support by the 2A crowd, and have a picture of him violating the law and violating the terms of his bail agreements all in one fell swoop. Fing brilliant move.

But this is the dumb*** that bragged to some journalists about him having Top Secret papers in his hand, and telling them he cant let them see them because he cant declassify them --- all the while spouting that he has declassified them as some dumb*** defense move.

The same dumb*** that goes on TV and tells everyone that the documents in question are 'all mine' and that they should all be given back to him.

Let's take the part out after the "Do I think it should be charged? No"

We agree. I as a non-lawyer interprets "receipt of the firearm" means he's legally taken possession or came into possession by some type of illegal means, not handling it at a store or gun show. That's just me.

Everything past that I won't comment on as we've hashed that in other posts. I feel like I know your stance on Trump, you're not a fan.

Possession requires ownership and/or control.

'Receive' (from Oxford) --- 'to take into one's hands or one's possession'.

Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

You are so eat up with the dude, it's hilarious!

Please serve us up another word salad on the definitions of nouns and verbs! EPIC!

(09-28-2023 09:40 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 06:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Let's take the part out after the "Do I think it should be charged? No"

We agree. I as a non-lawyer interprets "receipt of the firearm" means he's legally taken possession or came into possession by some type of illegal means, not handling it at a store or gun show. That's just me.

Everything past that I won't comment on as we've hashed that in other posts. I feel like I know your stance on Trump, you're not a fan.

Possession requires ownership and/or control.

'Receive' (from Oxford) --- 'to take into one's hands or one's possession'.

Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

You are so eat up with the dude, it's hilarious!

Please serve us up another word salad on the definitions of nouns and verbs! EPIC!

I would suggest some of you learn some better English comprehension. They think 'you lie' is an answer to everything. But please continue with your ranting. Its really humorous.

(09-28-2023 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 06:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 04:14 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi...uncard.pdf

922(n) -- makes the receipt of a firearm by a person who is indicted for a crime having a sentence greater than one year a felony offense.

The word isnt 'own', it isnt 'possess', the wording is 'receipt by'.

That is, if you are under indictment for a crime having a sentence of 1 year and 1 day, or longer, and your brother hands you a shotgun to go dove hunting, and you even as much as carry it --- that is a violation.

Do I think it should be charged? No.

But a serious dumfk action by Trump and his folks. Yeah, lets gin up support by the 2A crowd, and have a picture of him violating the law and violating the terms of his bail agreements all in one fell swoop. Fing brilliant move.

But this is the dumb*** that bragged to some journalists about him having Top Secret papers in his hand, and telling them he cant let them see them because he cant declassify them --- all the while spouting that he has declassified them as some dumb*** defense move.

The same dumb*** that goes on TV and tells everyone that the documents in question are 'all mine' and that they should all be given back to him.

Let's take the part out after the "Do I think it should be charged? No"

We agree. I as a non-lawyer interprets "receipt of the firearm" means he's legally taken possession or came into possession by some type of illegal means, not handling it at a store or gun show. That's just me.

Everything past that I won't comment on as we've hashed that in other posts. I feel like I know your stance on Trump, you're not a fan.

Possession requires ownership and/or control.

'Receive' (from Oxford) --- 'to take into one's hands or one's possession'.

Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

I would think that would mean it would have to be in permanent possession not temporary possession... I dunno.. We'll see what happens.

(09-28-2023 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 06:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-27-2023 04:14 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi...uncard.pdf

922(n) -- makes the receipt of a firearm by a person who is indicted for a crime having a sentence greater than one year a felony offense.

The word isnt 'own', it isnt 'possess', the wording is 'receipt by'.

That is, if you are under indictment for a crime having a sentence of 1 year and 1 day, or longer, and your brother hands you a shotgun to go dove hunting, and you even as much as carry it --- that is a violation.

Do I think it should be charged? No.

But a serious dumfk action by Trump and his folks. Yeah, lets gin up support by the 2A crowd, and have a picture of him violating the law and violating the terms of his bail agreements all in one fell swoop. Fing brilliant move.

But this is the dumb*** that bragged to some journalists about him having Top Secret papers in his hand, and telling them he cant let them see them because he cant declassify them --- all the while spouting that he has declassified them as some dumb*** defense move.

The same dumb*** that goes on TV and tells everyone that the documents in question are 'all mine' and that they should all be given back to him.

Let's take the part out after the "Do I think it should be charged? No"

We agree. I as a non-lawyer interprets "receipt of the firearm" means he's legally taken possession or came into possession by some type of illegal means, not handling it at a store or gun show. That's just me.

Everything past that I won't comment on as we've hashed that in other posts. I feel like I know your stance on Trump, you're not a fan.

Possession requires ownership and/or control.

'Receive' (from Oxford) --- 'to take into one's hands or one's possession'.

Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

How many words for a “kerfluffle”?

(09-28-2023 11:13 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 06:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Let's take the part out after the "Do I think it should be charged? No"

We agree. I as a non-lawyer interprets "receipt of the firearm" means he's legally taken possession or came into possession by some type of illegal means, not handling it at a store or gun show. That's just me.

Everything past that I won't comment on as we've hashed that in other posts. I feel like I know your stance on Trump, you're not a fan.

Possession requires ownership and/or control.

'Receive' (from Oxford) --- 'to take into one's hands or one's possession'.

Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

I would think that would mean it would have to be in permanent possession not temporary possession... I dunno.. We'll see what happens.

Well.... many drug cases and at least one 922n case (shotgun, loaned from brother for dove hunting. held for about 5 min) kind of tilt the other way.

(09-28-2023 10:57 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:40 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Possession requires ownership and/or control.

'Receive' (from Oxford) --- 'to take into one's hands or one's possession'.

Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

You are so eat up with the dude, it's hilarious!

Please serve us up another word salad on the definitions of nouns and verbs! EPIC!

I would suggest some of you learn some better English comprehension. They think 'you lie' is an answer to everything. But please continue with your ranting. Its really humorous.

I'm sorry that me pointing out your lies is bothering you this much.

If it helps, let me rephrase for you. You are a completely disingenuous huckster that pretends to be calling balls & strikes, under the guise that you love this country and just want justice to be served.

Is that better for your delicate sensibilities?

(09-28-2023 11:52 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 10:57 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:40 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Receipt- Mark a bill as paid. The law didn't say receive it said 'receipt of a firearm'. It could be interpreted as received.

Received also has a definition that states 'be given, presented with, or paid'.

In my mind if no money passed hands it's a non issue. Again I'm not a legal expert.

No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

You are so eat up with the dude, it's hilarious!

Please serve us up another word salad on the definitions of nouns and verbs! EPIC!

I would suggest some of you learn some better English comprehension. They think 'you lie' is an answer to everything. But please continue with your ranting. Its really humorous.

I'm sorry that me pointing out your lies is bothering you this much.

If it helps, let me rephrase for you. You are a completely disingenuous huckster that pretends to be calling balls & strikes, under the guise that you love this country and just want justice to be served.

Is that better for your delicate sensibilities?

Funny, you still cant point out a specific lie in all your pinhead caterwauling. Good for you.

As for my delicate sensibilities, I dont give a rat's ass what a person who is so ignorant that cant point out any specific lie in their rager triggered blathering about 'nothing but lies'. Have fun there, chuckles.

The pattern is you make some general dumb*** statement, and when pressed, make another generalized dumb*** statement in response. Just like you do in your last post. Yay. Arent we lucky....

(09-28-2023 03:33 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 11:52 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 10:57 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:40 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-28-2023 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  No sweat.

First to be in receipt, one must receive. Im just using the base verb.

For example -- I am in receipt of news. That means I have received the news. I dont think the form of 'marked as paid' seemingly fits.

And the 'mark a bill as paid' is a verb form, the form in the statute is a noun -- 'in receipt of'. The 'nounization' of the verb receive to use a Bushism as an explanation.

The definition of you receipt you provided has an 'or'. I dont think there would be a requirement of payment. It can happen, but not necessary. The function of an 'or'.

Think of 'receive mail'. No money has to transfer. It just means you got it.

Be good dunn. This is all a kerfluffle. Kind of idiotic for Trump to do this with the issues he has, but still just a kerfluffle.

You are so eat up with the dude, it's hilarious!

Please serve us up another word salad on the definitions of nouns and verbs! EPIC!

I would suggest some of you learn some better English comprehension. They think 'you lie' is an answer to everything. But please continue with your ranting. Its really humorous.

I'm sorry that me pointing out your lies is bothering you this much.

If it helps, let me rephrase for you. You are a completely disingenuous huckster that pretends to be calling balls & strikes, under the guise that you love this country and just want justice to be served.

Is that better for your delicate sensibilities?

Funny, you still cant point out a specific lie in all your pinhead caterwauling. Good for you.

As for my delicate sensibilities, I dont give a rat's ass what a person who is so ignorant that cant point out any specific lie in their rager triggered blathering about 'nothing but lies'. Have fun there, chuckles.

The pattern is you make some general dumb*** statement, and when pressed, make another generalized dumb*** statement in response. Just like you do in your last post. Yay. Arent we lucky....

The lie is that you are saying all this because you care about "the law". Your motive is completely fraudulent and every time you say otherwise, you are lying. Example...point me to all the threads where you have this same vitriol for someone not named Trump. I'll wait.

I thought my point was pretty clear on your deceit. I apologize for not being more clear. I will dumb it down for you, in the future.

Whatever you paid for that law degree was WAY too much.

Jesus H Christ is he still bloviating? He said he couldn't care less like 6 pages ago.

(09-28-2023 03:52 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Jesus H Christ is he still bloviating? He said he couldn't care less like 6 pages ago.

Right?!?

(09-28-2023 03:52 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Jesus H Christ is he still bloviating? He said he couldn't care less like 6 pages ago.

Yes he did.

He can bloviate all he wants but if he wants to keep anyone engaged he might think about inputting in other threads that aren't specifically about Trump. It's not a good look. But hey, I don't see his crap anymore so what do I care.