(09-11-2023 02:20 PM)bullet Wrote: (09-11-2023 01:18 PM)gwelymernans Wrote: (09-10-2023 01:42 PM)bullet Wrote: Really stupid.
On the other hand, his attorney does have a good question. How can Michigan St. use university rules (which are tilted against the accused) in a personal relationship? Note that this is not just a review of a coaches conduct, but a Title IX investigation.
And did he try to repeat it? Did she tell him no when he was doing it? She didn't hang up.
According to her she froze up... this is a common PTSD symptom regardless of what the trauma or trigger is. It's no less believable that a sexual assault survivor would shell up over sexual harrassment than that a veteran would shell up upon hearing fireworks. If you've never had PTSD, the central nervous system and fight-or-flight hormones aren't a voluntary response (by definition, biologically speaking), and it's like being trapped w/o agency in a body that is on some weird autopilot and it's abjectly horrifying.
That makes sense. Of course, that could also lead him to believe she was fine with it.
As dumb as Tucker was for starting this relationship, or whatever it was, up in the first place, I think that it's really important to consider a couple of things here:
1. Tucker knew about her past. How likely would anybody, especially a highly respected football coach, be to proceed to sexually harass someone who had been through that in the past, then tell investigators that the call actually happened but she was ok with it? I mean, I know that guy's an idiot, but this narrative that he somehow trapped her on a phone call then proceeded to masturbate while she was so frozen up in shock that she couldn't find the "end call" button is hard to believe. Was he masturbating on the phone call in an attempt to woo her? Anybody who doesn't have a kneejerk "he's guilty until proven innocent" reaction to any sexual assault claim would at least ask some questions about how things actually proceeded. Unless...
2. MSU knew by the end of last season that Tucker needed to go, but they had a problem with his contract. It was just way too large, and the buyout would crimp their ability to replace him with a quality coach. How could they find a way to get out of that contract? Wait, Tucker had a relationship with somebody, a sexual assault survivor you say, and she works for the University? It's like MSU got stuck with the worst shed in town, on the outskirts, away from everything, barely even a dirt path to get to the front door, then they found $80m worth of gold in the basement. Unlikely doesn't begin to describe it.
If Tucker was 16-3 instead of 10-9 over his past 19 games, the girl would have gotten a payoff and it would have gone away. And that's the most charitable way to look at this whole sordid situation. I personally think that it's far more likely that they dated, had some phone sex, things didn't work out, perhaps he was a bit mean to her, perhaps he cheated on her, I dunno, but she decided to get some revenge. And MSU had a very strong incentive to help her get her revenge, then leaked one detail of the investigation but nothing else, in an attempt to assassinate Tucker's character. Heck, I don't even blame them, as I stated yesterday, this sort of thing is par for the course with these super high dollar contracts when things go sour.
I wonder if part of the reason that Kiffin stayed at Ole Miss last year was that he knew he'd never pass a character test and wouldn't get paid $10m a year for 10 years if he got fired, anyway? It doesn't seem all that far fetched to me.