(07-13-2023 07:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  It wants to be Crimson Phantom but it lacks any credibility. No one takes it seriously.

So, I'm an "it" now?

You guys are seriously ****** in the head.

It rubs the lotion on its skin....

(07-13-2023 07:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2023 07:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  It wants to be Crimson Phantom but it lacks any credibility. No one takes it seriously.

So, I'm an "it" now?

You guys are seriously ****** in the head.

yep ... ewer an "it" that amazingly has access to all 'news' outlets with a paywall..

(07-13-2023 07:00 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(07-12-2023 07:50 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Never click on a commietom link

Exactly. There's no point in changing link names.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

I don't. I did the ignore thing when he refused time after time to rationally reply with facts rather than continually name call and berate.

He can do what he wants, but I don't have to participate.

Did Georgia ever locate all of the missing chain of custody documentation?

I didnt think so.

“Filed in Fulton county GA.” Yeah. Sure.

(08-29-2023 05:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  “Filed in Fulton county GA.” Yeah. Sure.

The location itself is laughable. yeah, they're really interested in finding the truth. Ha, ha. Oh Tom, you are such a fool.

(07-13-2023 07:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2023 07:00 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(07-12-2023 07:50 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Never click on a commietom link

Exactly. There's no point in changing link names.

Must we go through this ridiculous ******* exercise every time I include a link in a post?

I'm following the ******* functionality of this site when you click on the global icon above the text box for 'Insert hyperlink'. You get a box to enter the link, then a second box to enter a title for the URL. Which is where the title of the linked story goes, so I enter that. Others prefer to simply put 'Link' in that box. My preference is to put the title of the story I'm linking to as it conveys the actual work of the creator of the story at the website I'm linking. Further, on pretty much every web browser I'm aware of, you can hover over the link and it will tell you what website it's going to.

If you guys don't happen to like it. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, SHUT THE **** ABOUT IT!!! Go ***** to GTS...I'm sure he'd LOVE to hear this continual whining petty

Aww look, poor tom is having a tantrum.

(07-12-2023 04:06 PM)The Sicatoka Wrote:  Per GuideStar, a 501©3 called "True the Vote" is incorporated in Texas (Houston address).

A Fulton County (Georgia) subpoena is worth as much as the points on "Whose Line Is Anyway" in Texas. How much is that?

How many points did TTV get when they reached out to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger?

(08-29-2023 07:39 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-13-2023 07:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2023 07:00 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(07-12-2023 07:50 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Never click on a commietom link

Exactly. There's no point in changing link names.

Must we go through this ridiculous ******* exercise every time I include a link in a post?

I'm following the ******* functionality of this site when you click on the global icon above the text box for 'Insert hyperlink'. You get a box to enter the link, then a second box to enter a title for the URL. Which is where the title of the linked story goes, so I enter that. Others prefer to simply put 'Link' in that box. My preference is to put the title of the story I'm linking to as it conveys the actual work of the creator of the story at the website I'm linking. Further, on pretty much every web browser I'm aware of, you can hover over the link and it will tell you what website it's going to.

If you guys don't happen to like it. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, SHUT THE **** ABOUT IT!!! Go ***** to GTS...I'm sure he'd LOVE to hear this continual whining petty

Aww look, poor tom is having a tantrum.

Post was from well over a month ago. Try to keep up.

(08-29-2023 04:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Did Georgia ever locate all of the missing chain of custody documentation?

I didnt think so.

Dude, it's a dead horse. Had zip and pip to do with the final vote tallies. Yes, a few places didn't follow the proper procedures. Again, this does not imply nor prove fraud and it's not anything even remotely close to disenfranchise a voter over.

It's just another ridiculous talking point of yours because you can't accept the fact that your cult leader is a lying loser.

OK, maybe it was actually 1999 mules.

(08-30-2023 08:43 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-29-2023 04:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Did Georgia ever locate all of the missing chain of custody documentation?

I didnt think so.

Dude, it's a dead horse. Had zip and pip to do with the final vote tallies. Yes, a few places didn't follow the proper procedures. Again, this does not imply nor prove fraud and it's not anything even remotely close to disenfranchise a voter over.

It's just another ridiculous talking point of yours because you can't accept the fact that your cult leader is a lying loser.

Keeping the chain of custody documentation is required by law. Without it it, you CAN NOT STATE that the election was free and fair. In other words, everyone including Trump SHOULD question the results, because GA cant prove that all of the ballots in the count were entered legally.

(08-30-2023 09:06 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-30-2023 08:43 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-29-2023 04:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Did Georgia ever locate all of the missing chain of custody documentation?

I didnt think so.

Dude, it's a dead horse. Had zip and pip to do with the final vote tallies. Yes, a few places didn't follow the proper procedures. Again, this does not imply nor prove fraud and it's not anything even remotely close to disenfranchise a voter over.

It's just another ridiculous talking point of yours because you can't accept the fact that your cult leader is a lying loser.

Keeping the chain of custody documentation is required by law. Without it it, you CAN NOT STATE that the election was free and fair. In other words, everyone including Trump SHOULD question the results, because GA cant prove that all of the ballots in the count were entered legally.

Yes, everyone is aware. A couple counties ****** up.

But yes, without them you CAN state it was free and fair because they recounted and audited many times over. Missing those documents no way proves that any fraud occurred. It just doesn't.

All that's missing is a document that states how man absentee ballots were taken from a drop box. Those ballots are still verified against ballots sent to those voters and the signatures are verified. The recounts and audits would easily catch something anywhere near ten thousand votes. Not to mention the level of coordination that would be needed to obtain thousands of ballots, get valid signatures on them and then get them in a drop box where the worker taking them out and transporting them would not complete the custody document.

You believing some concoction of Georgia Democrats could coordinate something on this scale without being caught is hysterical.

(08-30-2023 09:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-30-2023 09:06 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-30-2023 08:43 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-29-2023 04:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Did Georgia ever locate all of the missing chain of custody documentation?

I didnt think so.

Dude, it's a dead horse. Had zip and pip to do with the final vote tallies. Yes, a few places didn't follow the proper procedures. Again, this does not imply nor prove fraud and it's not anything even remotely close to disenfranchise a voter over.

It's just another ridiculous talking point of yours because you can't accept the fact that your cult leader is a lying loser.

Keeping the chain of custody documentation is required by law. Without it it, you CAN NOT STATE that the election was free and fair. In other words, everyone including Trump SHOULD question the results, because GA cant prove that all of the ballots in the count were entered legally.

Yes, everyone is aware. A couple counties ****** up.

But yes, without them you CAN state it was free and fair because they recounted and audited many times over. Missing those documents no way proves that any fraud occurred. It just doesn't.

All that's missing is a document that states how man absentee ballots were taken from a drop box. Those ballots are still verified against ballots sent to those voters and the signatures are verified. The recounts and audits would easily catch something anywhere near ten thousand votes. Not to mention the level of coordination that would be needed to obtain thousands of ballots, get valid signatures on them and then get them in a drop box where the worker taking them out and transporting them would not complete the custody document.

You believing some concoction of Georgia Democrats could coordinate something on this scale without being caught is hysterical.

Recounting does NOTHING but to count the votes that that you can not prove are legit.

Without the documentation, the election can not be stated as free and fair. And if "some counties f*cked up", then why was that exactly. They basically broke the law.

So its confirmed, the GA elections were not free and fair.

(08-30-2023 09:44 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-30-2023 09:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-30-2023 09:06 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-30-2023 08:43 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-29-2023 04:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Did Georgia ever locate all of the missing chain of custody documentation?

I didnt think so.

Dude, it's a dead horse. Had zip and pip to do with the final vote tallies. Yes, a few places didn't follow the proper procedures. Again, this does not imply nor prove fraud and it's not anything even remotely close to disenfranchise a voter over.

It's just another ridiculous talking point of yours because you can't accept the fact that your cult leader is a lying loser.

Keeping the chain of custody documentation is required by law. Without it it, you CAN NOT STATE that the election was free and fair. In other words, everyone including Trump SHOULD question the results, because GA cant prove that all of the ballots in the count were entered legally.

Yes, everyone is aware. A couple counties ****** up.

But yes, without them you CAN state it was free and fair because they recounted and audited many times over. Missing those documents no way proves that any fraud occurred. It just doesn't.

All that's missing is a document that states how man absentee ballots were taken from a drop box. Those ballots are still verified against ballots sent to those voters and the signatures are verified. The recounts and audits would easily catch something anywhere near ten thousand votes. Not to mention the level of coordination that would be needed to obtain thousands of ballots, get valid signatures on them and then get them in a drop box where the worker taking them out and transporting them would not complete the custody document.

You believing some concoction of Georgia Democrats could coordinate something on this scale without being caught is hysterical.

Recounting does NOTHING but to count the votes that that you can not prove are legit.

Without the documentation, the election can not be stated as free and fair. And if "some counties f*cked up", then why was that exactly. They basically broke the law.

So its confirmed, the GA elections were not free and fair.

But, yes, you CAN prove their legit because you can do that with absentee ballots. They keep records of who they send them to. They know they're registered voters. They have their signatures on file. The compare the sent rolls to the received rolls to the signatures and determine they are legitimate votes from legitimate voters.

Interjecting 10,000+ votes into that system would stick out like a sore thumb.

But again, you seemed to be confused with how breaking laws in this area work. Some worker forgetting to follow a procedure and/or making an oversight isn't really breaking a law unless you can prove some intent.

Yes, this an area where elections can and need to be improved. But no, it doesn't mean that you disenfranchise those voters or do any sort of revote like you've ridiculously asserted in the past.

Strange TTV doesn’t have any information about their whistleblower. Must have followed Hillary Clinton and the January 6th commission’s lead.

Wonder if TTV took a hammer to the evidence, used Bleachbit or just “failed to preserve the evidence”.

(08-30-2023 10:05 AM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Strange TTV doesn’t have any information about their whistleblower. Must have followed Hillary Clinton and the January 6th commission’s lead.

Wonder if TTV took a hammer to the evidence, used Bleachbit or just “failed to preserve the evidence”.

None of that is required when it didn't exist to begin with. They either completely made it up, or the supposed data from that criminal Dinesh was worthless from the jump.

I'd bet on the latter. Especially with what the evidence showed when his method was actually reviewed. The best part was when it was shown that he used a map of Russia instead of one from Georgia in the USA.