(04-14-2023 09:28 PM)Cardiff Wrote: (04-14-2023 08:41 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: With Berger's changes i think the Marines are pretty close to becoming irrelevant.
Probably not a coincidence. They are the branch which was most deeply ingrained in the warrior ethos, and the most resistant to the new ways: Clinton, Obama, the alphabet people, and so forth.
So much for that.
My thought for USMC. You really respect the Royal Marines (about the only force that you truly do respect), so take a page from their book. When the RMs were faced with budgetary extinction after WWII, they reinvented themselves as a combination commando and amphibious infantry force.
Let the Army focus on large unit (division and above) continental overland frontal actions (Russia attempts to invade western Europe) and Marines focus on small unit (regiment or battalion or smaller) littoral and asymmetric actions.
Let the Marines take over AFSOC the way the RMs took over UK's commando forces. Have about 30,000 Marines in AFSOC, supported by about 10,000 each SEALs, Green Berets, and AFSOC, the way SAS and SBS support the RMs. Every Marine E5 and above would become commando trained and qualified.
On the amphib side, make the basic unit a new combined arms (infantry, tanks, artillery, amphib armor, air) Marine Expeditionary Regiment (MER). Have 27 active (with 3:1 rotation that means 9 ready to go at any time) and 9 reserves. That 108,000 active Marines and 36,000 reservists. Have 10 Navy amphib squadrons, 1 in maintenance and 9 deployable at any time, each able to carry one MER.
That's 138,000 active Marines, add 20,000 training and admin for a total Corps of 158,000, roughly a 15% decrease in active numbers, with a doubling in size of the reserves.,