(03-11-2023 08:35 AM)BIGDTiger Wrote:  

(03-11-2023 08:01 AM)Tigerspartan Wrote:  With Cincys blowout win yesterday, we played one game and picked up 3 key quad games.

+1 quad one game at cincy
+1 quad two game home cincy
+1 quad two game beating UCF

Tulane is 100 this morning. Beating them on a neutral would be another quad 2, but in the process could knock them to quad 3.

If we win tonight, we could be 13-7 in quad 1/2 with 3 quad 1 wins.
1 quad 3 loss.

Very comparable or better than most of teams on the 7 line. Is it too late or is the committee watching?

I think we come in higher than most expect. Unless the committee is more sold out for the fake P5 hype than I realize. We have way too many quality Win’s, no bad losses really, and haven’t been blown out by anyone. My prediction is a 6 seed if we win today. If we win the tournament I think we should be a 5 seed.

Name the last time we got a higher seed than everybody expected. We are consistently 1-2 seed lines below where we should be.

The committee is made up of a bunch of dumb-a$$es who think that going 3-9 against quad 1 opponents is better than going 2-3 against quad 1 opponents because "MoRe QUalIty WinZZZ!!!"

I'd love to be a 7

(03-11-2023 01:30 PM)jgardne Wrote:  

(03-11-2023 08:35 AM)BIGDTiger Wrote:  

(03-11-2023 08:01 AM)Tigerspartan Wrote:  With Cincys blowout win yesterday, we played one game and picked up 3 key quad games.

+1 quad one game at cincy
+1 quad two game home cincy
+1 quad two game beating UCF

Tulane is 100 this morning. Beating them on a neutral would be another quad 2, but in the process could knock them to quad 3.

If we win tonight, we could be 13-7 in quad 1/2 with 3 quad 1 wins.
1 quad 3 loss.

Very comparable or better than most of teams on the 7 line. Is it too late or is the committee watching?

I think we come in higher than most expect. Unless the committee is more sold out for the fake P5 hype than I realize. We have way too many quality Win’s, no bad losses really, and haven’t been blown out by anyone. My prediction is a 6 seed if we win today. If we win the tournament I think we should be a 5 seed.

Name the last time we got a higher seed than everybody expected. We are consistently 1-2 seed lines below where we should be.

The committee is made up of a bunch of dumb-a$$es who think that going 3-9 against quad 1 opponents is better than going 2-3 against quad 1 opponents because "MoRe QUalIty WinZZZ!!!"

I think our tough non con schedule will help us. Not all the people on the committee are like that

They’ll lock us in at an 8 with a win this evening.

https://imgur.com/a/zzmlXdj

If you want to compare our resume to current “7 & 8” seeds according to lunardi.

Looks like it’s just posting the link and not the picture. Dunno how to fix it.

Anyways if I was looking at the numbers and being honest the only ones I would say we are for sure above are Maryland and Iowa. The rest are tossups depending what you value more or have a better resume. Personally I’d also have us above UK and mizzou

(03-11-2023 02:38 PM)Fluke Wrote:  https://imgur.com/a/zzmlXdj

If you want to compare our resume to current “7 & 8” seeds according to lunardi.

Looks like it’s just posting the link and not the picture. Dunno how to fix it.

Anyways if I was looking at the numbers and being honest the only ones I would say we are for sure above are Maryland and Iowa. The rest are tossups depending what you value more or have a better resume. Personally I’d also have us above UK and mizzou

The SOS they show for us is incorrect. Its 41, not 71. Which makes us look all the more better. It will also jump up if we end up playing Houston again.