(06-05-2023 10:30 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:27 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 09:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 08:37 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 07:52 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  No guy in a dress would have read anything to my boys. If you think that's cool then I hope you have no offspring.

Bartlett, I have zero issue with you, or anyone, saying 'nope, cant read to my boys as a man in a dress.' Your right as a parent. You are totally within your rights to pee in your underoos at the potential of your children encountering a man in dress.

The problem is that you apparently try to impose that rather benign action with it being illegal in any and every instance.

And, honestly, you have zero right to do that. Even if you are a Mr Warrior Way. Kind of humorous that Mr Warrior Way apparently pees in his underoos when confronted with the issue of having a man in dress read to his children, you have to admit.

I'll admit it... NO DRAG &/OR TRANS WITH CHILDREN -- PERIOD.

And just to be clear, while it is the commonly held principle that consenting adults can do what they want, I personally disagree.

We often hear of someone being charged with murder because a group of people were doing drugs and someone died from an overdose. Obviously the adults were consenting.

A couple could be engaged in bondage/rough sex which leads to death.

Rough sex excuse in women's deaths is variation of 'crime of passion' – study

Videos have been posted of people "improperly riding" where they are sitting with their torso outside of a car. They obviously chose to do this, but when they fall out of the car and die, people have been charged with manslaughter.

A woman can't appear totally nude and men can't touch women in strip clubs in certain cities, even though both adults are there for that very reason.

Tenn. court upholds city’s licensing law on strip clubs

Quote:The City of Knoxville passed a licensing ordinance in May 2005 that prohibited total nudity and touching by patrons, prohibited alcohol on the premises, limited the businesses’ hours of operations, and required the businesses and their employees to obtain licenses.

These are just a few examples where society does draw a line of unacceptable behavior between two consenting adults.

Either the behavior is moral or it isn't.

Society tends to disallow immoral behavior -- period. Of course, this has been changing over generations, and we see the results of decay.


Again, our Founders understood religious morality is REQUIRED in order to maintain a free government. Religious morality doesn't have boundaries such as "behind closed doors".

There are those who don't like being restricted by religious morality, but accepting that attitude impacts all of society.

And quite funny when stacked against the loads of people that cheer on MMA fighting, boxing, and football.

Same dangers. Same issue of consent. Are you all on board with your 'consenting adults' stance with that in mind?

Ahh... an argument with a subtext against traditional male roles.

Why am I not surprised.

Lolz. Can’t answer a very easy counterpoint. A simple yes or no will do aside from your dodge.

What is the ‘subtext’ against male roles? Nothing bad about any of the three, even if they can/ do result on long term catastrophic physical issues.

You went spouting off on the failure of consent, and the above is a great counterpoint to your tome of issues. So —- are the 3 the same failure of consent as you flap your wings about above? Should be easy to answer given your comments above….

(06-05-2023 11:22 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Ok Groomer

Sounds good, pinhead. Lolz.

(06-05-2023 01:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 11:22 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Ok Groomer

Sounds good, pinhead. Lolz.

Ok, I chuckled. One for you.

(06-05-2023 11:45 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:31 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The legislation being addressed in Tennessee and in Florida is not aimed at men wearing dresses. It is aimed at men wearing dresses and singing dick in front of minors. And men wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors is not different from men not wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors.

Men wearing dresses and behaving themselves in an adult setting should not be a problem, and does not appear to be addressed by the laws being debated.

Exactly

I'm not going to get into another circular argument with him on this.

It's just a waste of time.

What I will do is post some more examples of depravity that should be absolutely outlawed for any child to be a participant.

Family friendly pride...but oh muh gerddddd, what about the man who dresses like Laura Ingalls and wants to read Mary Had a Little Dick to kids!!!!!!

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Funny, many of those that you go ape **** on would already be covered by obscenity laws.

Maybe enforce those. Or just continue on your homophobia kick.

Here's an idea -- why dont you compare and contrast your examples with the examples of female hookers on the street in LA or Seattle? Not a lick split of difference.

Or do you just want to single out homosexual men in your lase like focus on trans and homosexual?

That is the funny thing about this. There is plenty to post in the hetero world of streetwalkers engaging in the same level exhibitionism and lewdness, but lord forbid you dont bother with any of that. Brilliant.

(06-05-2023 01:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:30 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:27 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 09:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 08:37 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Bartlett, I have zero issue with you, or anyone, saying 'nope, cant read to my boys as a man in a dress.' Your right as a parent. You are totally within your rights to pee in your underoos at the potential of your children encountering a man in dress.

The problem is that you apparently try to impose that rather benign action with it being illegal in any and every instance.

And, honestly, you have zero right to do that. Even if you are a Mr Warrior Way. Kind of humorous that Mr Warrior Way apparently pees in his underoos when confronted with the issue of having a man in dress read to his children, you have to admit.

I'll admit it... NO DRAG &/OR TRANS WITH CHILDREN -- PERIOD.

And just to be clear, while it is the commonly held principle that consenting adults can do what they want, I personally disagree.

We often hear of someone being charged with murder because a group of people were doing drugs and someone died from an overdose. Obviously the adults were consenting.

A couple could be engaged in bondage/rough sex which leads to death.

Rough sex excuse in women's deaths is variation of 'crime of passion' – study

Videos have been posted of people "improperly riding" where they are sitting with their torso outside of a car. They obviously chose to do this, but when they fall out of the car and die, people have been charged with manslaughter.

A woman can't appear totally nude and men can't touch women in strip clubs in certain cities, even though both adults are there for that very reason.

Tenn. court upholds city’s licensing law on strip clubs

Quote:The City of Knoxville passed a licensing ordinance in May 2005 that prohibited total nudity and touching by patrons, prohibited alcohol on the premises, limited the businesses’ hours of operations, and required the businesses and their employees to obtain licenses.

These are just a few examples where society does draw a line of unacceptable behavior between two consenting adults.

Either the behavior is moral or it isn't.

Society tends to disallow immoral behavior -- period. Of course, this has been changing over generations, and we see the results of decay.


Again, our Founders understood religious morality is REQUIRED in order to maintain a free government. Religious morality doesn't have boundaries such as "behind closed doors".

There are those who don't like being restricted by religious morality, but accepting that attitude impacts all of society.

And quite funny when stacked against the loads of people that cheer on MMA fighting, boxing, and football.

Same dangers. Same issue of consent. Are you all on board with your 'consenting adults' stance with that in mind?

Ahh... an argument with a subtext against traditional male roles.

Why am I not surprised.

Lolz. Can’t answer a very easy counterpoint. A simple yes or no will do aside from your dodge.

What is the ‘subtext’ against male roles? Nothing bad about any of the three, even if they can/ do result on long term catastrophic physical issues.

You went spouting off on the failure of consent, and the above is a great counterpoint to your tome of issues. So —- are the 3 the same failure of consent as you flap your wings about above? Should be easy to answer given your comments above….

Your counterpoint was invalid.

And I did address it.

(06-05-2023 02:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 01:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:30 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:27 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 09:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  I'll admit it... NO DRAG &/OR TRANS WITH CHILDREN -- PERIOD.

And just to be clear, while it is the commonly held principle that consenting adults can do what they want, I personally disagree.

We often hear of someone being charged with murder because a group of people were doing drugs and someone died from an overdose. Obviously the adults were consenting.

A couple could be engaged in bondage/rough sex which leads to death.

Rough sex excuse in women's deaths is variation of 'crime of passion' – study

Videos have been posted of people "improperly riding" where they are sitting with their torso outside of a car. They obviously chose to do this, but when they fall out of the car and die, people have been charged with manslaughter.

A woman can't appear totally nude and men can't touch women in strip clubs in certain cities, even though both adults are there for that very reason.

Tenn. court upholds city’s licensing law on strip clubs



These are just a few examples where society does draw a line of unacceptable behavior between two consenting adults.

Either the behavior is moral or it isn't.

Society tends to disallow immoral behavior -- period. Of course, this has been changing over generations, and we see the results of decay.


Again, our Founders understood religious morality is REQUIRED in order to maintain a free government. Religious morality doesn't have boundaries such as "behind closed doors".

There are those who don't like being restricted by religious morality, but accepting that attitude impacts all of society.

And quite funny when stacked against the loads of people that cheer on MMA fighting, boxing, and football.

Same dangers. Same issue of consent. Are you all on board with your 'consenting adults' stance with that in mind?

Ahh... an argument with a subtext against traditional male roles.

Why am I not surprised.

Lolz. Can’t answer a very easy counterpoint. A simple yes or no will do aside from your dodge.

What is the ‘subtext’ against male roles? Nothing bad about any of the three, even if they can/ do result on long term catastrophic physical issues.

You went spouting off on the failure of consent, and the above is a great counterpoint to your tome of issues. So —- are the 3 the same failure of consent as you flap your wings about above? Should be easy to answer given your comments above….

Your counterpoint was invalid.

And I did address it.

The only manner in which you addressed it was 'how dare you bring up the topic of consent with respect to MMA fighting, boxing, and football.'

Couched in some blather about it being some subtext against 'traditional male values'.

If you call that a response..... well.... I wont go there. What a clown show.

Yes how dare your comment on the failure of consent be used and compared to that in the context of MMA, boxing, and football..... lolz.

(06-05-2023 03:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 02:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 01:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:30 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:27 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  And quite funny when stacked against the loads of people that cheer on MMA fighting, boxing, and football.

Same dangers. Same issue of consent. Are you all on board with your 'consenting adults' stance with that in mind?

Ahh... an argument with a subtext against traditional male roles.

Why am I not surprised.

Lolz. Can’t answer a very easy counterpoint. A simple yes or no will do aside from your dodge.

What is the ‘subtext’ against male roles? Nothing bad about any of the three, even if they can/ do result on long term catastrophic physical issues.

You went spouting off on the failure of consent, and the above is a great counterpoint to your tome of issues. So —- are the 3 the same failure of consent as you flap your wings about above? Should be easy to answer given your comments above….

Your counterpoint was invalid.

And I did address it.

The only manner in which you addressed it was 'how dare you bring up the topic of consent with respect to MMA fighting, boxing, and football.'

Couched in some blather about it being some subtext against 'traditional male values'.

If you call that a response..... well.... I wont go there. What a clown show.

Yes how dare your comment on the failure of consent be used and compared to that in the context of MMA, boxing, and football..... lolz.

Wrong. I did not say "how dare you".

Men historically have engaged in battles.

Plus, organized sports are governed by league rules, player contracts, and governmental entities.

I see no similarity between my points and your counterpoint. I think it's invalid and I stand by that.

(06-05-2023 03:26 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 03:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 02:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 01:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:30 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  Ahh... an argument with a subtext against traditional male roles.

Why am I not surprised.

Lolz. Can’t answer a very easy counterpoint. A simple yes or no will do aside from your dodge.

What is the ‘subtext’ against male roles? Nothing bad about any of the three, even if they can/ do result on long term catastrophic physical issues.

You went spouting off on the failure of consent, and the above is a great counterpoint to your tome of issues. So —- are the 3 the same failure of consent as you flap your wings about above? Should be easy to answer given your comments above….

Your counterpoint was invalid.

And I did address it.

The only manner in which you addressed it was 'how dare you bring up the topic of consent with respect to MMA fighting, boxing, and football.'

Couched in some blather about it being some subtext against 'traditional male values'.

If you call that a response..... well.... I wont go there. What a clown show.

Yes how dare your comment on the failure of consent be used and compared to that in the context of MMA, boxing, and football..... lolz.

Wrong. I did not say "how dare you".

Men historically have engaged in battles.

Plus, organized sports are governed by league rules, player contracts, and governmental entities.

I see no similarity between my points and your counterpoint. I think it's invalid and I stand by that.

At the base of every of those activities (boxing, MMA, football) is the concept of 'consent'. Think about it a tad, it'll come to you.

---------------

The 'historically' argument is similarly idiotic.

Using the concept of 'historically', I guess duels should be removed from consideration as being considered as such.

And it falls in your 'traditional male activity' smoke and mirrors falderall.

Imagine that.

Im sorry, but your entire screed about having to ignore 'consent' is pretty much baseless.

(06-05-2023 04:47 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 03:26 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 03:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 02:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 01:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Lolz. Can’t answer a very easy counterpoint. A simple yes or no will do aside from your dodge.

What is the ‘subtext’ against male roles? Nothing bad about any of the three, even if they can/ do result on long term catastrophic physical issues.

You went spouting off on the failure of consent, and the above is a great counterpoint to your tome of issues. So —- are the 3 the same failure of consent as you flap your wings about above? Should be easy to answer given your comments above….

Your counterpoint was invalid.

And I did address it.

The only manner in which you addressed it was 'how dare you bring up the topic of consent with respect to MMA fighting, boxing, and football.'

Couched in some blather about it being some subtext against 'traditional male values'.

If you call that a response..... well.... I wont go there. What a clown show.

Yes how dare your comment on the failure of consent be used and compared to that in the context of MMA, boxing, and football..... lolz.

Wrong. I did not say "how dare you".

Men historically have engaged in battles.

Plus, organized sports are governed by league rules, player contracts, and governmental entities.

I see no similarity between my points and your counterpoint. I think it's invalid and I stand by that.

At the base of every of those activities (boxing, MMA, football) is the concept of 'consent'. Think about it a tad, it'll come to you.

---------------

The 'historically' argument is similarly idiotic.

Using the concept of 'historically', I guess duels should be removed from consideration as being considered as such.

And it falls in your 'traditional male activity' smoke and mirrors falderall.

Imagine that.

Im sorry, but your entire screed about having to ignore 'consent' is pretty much baseless.

OK, so do you think duels should or should not be allowed?

(06-05-2023 02:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 11:45 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:31 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The legislation being addressed in Tennessee and in Florida is not aimed at men wearing dresses. It is aimed at men wearing dresses and singing dick in front of minors. And men wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors is not different from men not wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors.

Men wearing dresses and behaving themselves in an adult setting should not be a problem, and does not appear to be addressed by the laws being debated.

Exactly

I'm not going to get into another circular argument with him on this.

It's just a waste of time.

What I will do is post some more examples of depravity that should be absolutely outlawed for any child to be a participant.

Family friendly pride...but oh muh gerddddd, what about the man who dresses like Laura Ingalls and wants to read Mary Had a Little Dick to kids!!!!!!

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Funny, many of those that you go ape **** on would already be covered by obscenity laws.

Maybe enforce those. Or just continue on your homophobia kick.

Here's an idea -- why dont you compare and contrast your examples with the examples of female hookers on the street in LA or Seattle? Not a lick split of difference.

Or do you just want to single out homosexual men in your lase like focus on trans and homosexual?

That is the funny thing about this. There is plenty to post in the hetero world of streetwalkers engaging in the same level exhibitionism and lewdness, but lord forbid you dont bother with any of that. Brilliant.

What in the literal hell are you talking about.

All through this thread, I have posted videos of events or occurrences where adults are subjecting children to depraved obscene acts and behavior. Probably dozens at this point.

And you spew off about hookers? Where the hell is hooker month where they parade and celebrate hookers at schools and have the kids participate? Where are the hooker parades where naked men and women are simulating sex acts in broad daylight? Where is the hooker story hour?

Wtf are you smoking.

And I love the fact you pull homophobia out of your proverbial ass....

You know you've lost touch with reality, the argument, or both when you see that. Classic fail.







Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(06-05-2023 05:18 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 02:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 11:45 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:31 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The legislation being addressed in Tennessee and in Florida is not aimed at men wearing dresses. It is aimed at men wearing dresses and singing dick in front of minors. And men wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors is not different from men not wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors.

Men wearing dresses and behaving themselves in an adult setting should not be a problem, and does not appear to be addressed by the laws being debated.

Exactly

I'm not going to get into another circular argument with him on this.

It's just a waste of time.

What I will do is post some more examples of depravity that should be absolutely outlawed for any child to be a participant.

Family friendly pride...but oh muh gerddddd, what about the man who dresses like Laura Ingalls and wants to read Mary Had a Little Dick to kids!!!!!!

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Funny, many of those that you go ape **** on would already be covered by obscenity laws.

Maybe enforce those. Or just continue on your homophobia kick.

Here's an idea -- why dont you compare and contrast your examples with the examples of female hookers on the street in LA or Seattle? Not a lick split of difference.

Or do you just want to single out homosexual men in your lase like focus on trans and homosexual?

That is the funny thing about this. There is plenty to post in the hetero world of streetwalkers engaging in the same level exhibitionism and lewdness, but lord forbid you dont bother with any of that. Brilliant.

What in the literal hell are you talking about.

All through this thread, I have posted videos of events or occurrences where adults are subjecting children to depraved obscene acts and behavior. Probably dozens at this point.

And you spew off about hookers? Where the hell is hooker month where they parade and celebrate hookers at schools and have the kids participate? Where are the hooker parades where naked men and women are simulating sex acts in broad daylight? Where is the hooker story hour?

Wtf are you smoking.

And I love the fact you pull homophobia out of your proverbial ass....

You know you've lost touch with reality, the argument, or both when you see that. Classic fail.







Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

That's what he does, when a discussion isn't going his way he will move the goal post. I was wondering how long it was going to take for someone to bring that up about him inserting Hookers, Football etc; You have to watch him when he starts to steer the conversation in another direction.

(06-05-2023 05:18 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 02:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 11:45 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:31 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The legislation being addressed in Tennessee and in Florida is not aimed at men wearing dresses. It is aimed at men wearing dresses and singing dick in front of minors. And men wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors is not different from men not wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors.

Men wearing dresses and behaving themselves in an adult setting should not be a problem, and does not appear to be addressed by the laws being debated.

Exactly

I'm not going to get into another circular argument with him on this.

It's just a waste of time.

What I will do is post some more examples of depravity that should be absolutely outlawed for any child to be a participant.

Family friendly pride...but oh muh gerddddd, what about the man who dresses like Laura Ingalls and wants to read Mary Had a Little Dick to kids!!!!!!

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Funny, many of those that you go ape **** on would already be covered by obscenity laws.

Maybe enforce those. Or just continue on your homophobia kick.

Here's an idea -- why dont you compare and contrast your examples with the examples of female hookers on the street in LA or Seattle? Not a lick split of difference.

Or do you just want to single out homosexual men in your lase like focus on trans and homosexual?

That is the funny thing about this. There is plenty to post in the hetero world of streetwalkers engaging in the same level exhibitionism and lewdness, but lord forbid you dont bother with any of that. Brilliant.

What in the literal hell are you talking about.

All through this thread, I have posted videos of events or occurrences where adults are subjecting children to depraved obscene acts and behavior. Probably dozens at this point.

And you spew off about hookers? Where the hell is hooker month where they parade and celebrate hookers at schools and have the kids participate? Where are the hooker parades where naked men and women are simulating sex acts in broad daylight? Where is the hooker story hour?

Wtf are you smoking.

And I love the fact you pull homophobia out of your proverbial ass....

You know you've lost touch with reality, the argument, or both when you see that. Classic fail.







Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Here is the issue you put out ad nauseum:

"All through this thread, I have posted videos of events or occurrences where adults men dressed as women are subjecting children to depraved obscene acts and behavior. Probably dozens at this point."

I guess you havent noticed that odd little fact.

Then try and smudge it all away. Fairly laughable.

When someone concentrates as much as you do on highlighting *nothing but* the actions of homosexuals and trannies -- yeah -- you have a stick up your ass from somewhere about homosexuals and trannies. That is fairly obvious.

Quote:I have posted videos of events or occurrences where adults are subjecting children to depraved obscene acts and behavior.

Such "depraved" and "obscene acts and behaviors like "story hour". Seriously? "Story hour" is a depraved and obscene act and behavior? I guess if it were Granpa Peckerhead doing story hour you wouldnt screech as much about the 'depraved and obscene act and behavior' of 'story hour'.

When you characterize 'story hour' as a "depraved and obscene act and behavior", but only when done by a trannie, or a gay guy -- yes --- you are a homophobe. Thank you for highlighting that difference for us so clearly, all the while sputtering that you are not a homophobe.

Apparently "story hour" is such a 'depraved and obscene act and behavior' only when it is done by a trannie. I mean, you are highlighting the "story hour" as such a horrendous act against humanity. No, the act of a story hour is *not* a depraved and obscene act.

Yes, drag story hour is *such* the act of depravity. Lolz.

These whack job libs are nuts. As evidenced in this thread. Plus I think this tanq guy has turned into the worst, most despised poster here. Lol

(06-05-2023 10:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 05:18 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 02:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 11:45 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 10:31 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The legislation being addressed in Tennessee and in Florida is not aimed at men wearing dresses. It is aimed at men wearing dresses and singing dick in front of minors. And men wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors is not different from men not wearing dresses and slinging dick in front of minors.

Men wearing dresses and behaving themselves in an adult setting should not be a problem, and does not appear to be addressed by the laws being debated.

Exactly

I'm not going to get into another circular argument with him on this.

It's just a waste of time.

What I will do is post some more examples of depravity that should be absolutely outlawed for any child to be a participant.

Family friendly pride...but oh muh gerddddd, what about the man who dresses like Laura Ingalls and wants to read Mary Had a Little Dick to kids!!!!!!

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Funny, many of those that you go ape **** on would already be covered by obscenity laws.

Maybe enforce those. Or just continue on your homophobia kick.

Here's an idea -- why dont you compare and contrast your examples with the examples of female hookers on the street in LA or Seattle? Not a lick split of difference.

Or do you just want to single out homosexual men in your lase like focus on trans and homosexual?

That is the funny thing about this. There is plenty to post in the hetero world of streetwalkers engaging in the same level exhibitionism and lewdness, but lord forbid you dont bother with any of that. Brilliant.

What in the literal hell are you talking about.

All through this thread, I have posted videos of events or occurrences where adults are subjecting children to depraved obscene acts and behavior. Probably dozens at this point.

And you spew off about hookers? Where the hell is hooker month where they parade and celebrate hookers at schools and have the kids participate? Where are the hooker parades where naked men and women are simulating sex acts in broad daylight? Where is the hooker story hour?

Wtf are you smoking.

And I love the fact you pull homophobia out of your proverbial ass....

You know you've lost touch with reality, the argument, or both when you see that. Classic fail.







Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Here is the issue you put out ad nauseum:

"All through this thread, I have posted videos of events or occurrences where adults men dressed as women are subjecting children to depraved obscene acts and behavior. Probably dozens at this point."

I guess you havent noticed that odd little fact.

Then try and smudge it all away. Fairly laughable.

When someone concentrates as much as you do on highlighting *nothing but* the actions of homosexuals and trannies -- yeah -- you have a stick up your ass from somewhere about homosexuals and trannies. That is fairly obvious.

Quote:I have posted videos of events or occurrences where adults are subjecting children to depraved obscene acts and behavior.

Such "depraved" and "obscene acts and behaviors like "story hour". Seriously? "Story hour" is a depraved and obscene act and behavior? I guess if it were Granpa Peckerhead doing story hour you wouldnt screech as much about the 'depraved and obscene act and behavior' of 'story hour'.

When you characterize 'story hour' as a "depraved and obscene act and behavior", but only when done by a trannie, or a gay guy -- yes --- you are a homophobe. Thank you for highlighting that difference for us so clearly, all the while sputtering that you are not a homophobe.

Apparently "story hour" is such a 'depraved and obscene act and behavior' only when it is done by a trannie. I mean, you are highlighting the "story hour" as such a horrendous act against humanity. No, the act of a story hour is *not* a depraved and obscene act.

Yes, drag story hour is *such* the act of depravity. Lolz.

But it's just a man dressed as a woman or something....

Ya dummy... wanting these asshats to keep kids out of this is not homophobic or whatever phobic you want to try and label me you schmuck bastard.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

The horrors of 'story hour'. How obscene. To the extent that you feel the need to call out 'story hour' specifically. And include it as 'obscene' and 'depraved' behavior.

Max, some of the stuff you post *is* obscene. No doubt. There is little pushback with that.

But when you feel the need to label 'story hour' as explicitly as 'obscene' and 'depraved' behavior -- at least accept that your homophobia is present.

Coupled with the fact that you feel the overriding urge to limit everything you post to nothing but trannies and gay pride-style behavior, it really highlights your deep seated phobia.

There is obscene behavior all over the flipping place. From all quarters. But, all you can do is highlight and focus on one group doing that. Bravo.

Then you dont even have the fing spine to note what your bias is. Yes, your jihad and crusade is trannie and gay obscenity. Got it. That is the phobia and burr you have in your head.

(Im still laughing over your rant above where you say 'I aint phobic', then go and tell us how 'story hour' is an obscene and depraved act...... lolz..... not any 'story hour', seemingly *only* story hour by men dressed as women. Somehow any other story hour is okay, so the only obscene thing is a guy dressed as a woman, and nothing else.... all while you sputter and stammer that you are not homophobic or transphobic..... then when you are caught with our own words all you can do is yammer 'bastard schmuck'...... flipping priceless....)

(06-05-2023 11:02 PM)450bench Wrote:  These whack job libs are nuts. As evidenced in this thread. Plus I think this tanq guy has turned into the worst, most despised poster here. Lol

Poor lil ol 450 having a meltdown morning. Maybe try a substantive post for once.

(06-06-2023 08:03 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 11:02 PM)450bench Wrote:  These whack job libs are nuts. As evidenced in this thread. Plus I think this tanq guy has turned into the worst, most despised poster here. Lol

Poor lil ol 450 having a meltdown morning. Maybe try a substantive post for once.

Maybe you should try not being a doosh for once?

(06-05-2023 11:02 PM)450bench Wrote:  These whack job libs are nuts. As evidenced in this thread. Plus I think this tanq guy has turned into the worst, most despised poster here. Lol

Septic tanq is on ignore. His drivel is boring.

(06-06-2023 08:05 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(06-06-2023 08:03 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-05-2023 11:02 PM)450bench Wrote:  These whack job libs are nuts. As evidenced in this thread. Plus I think this tanq guy has turned into the worst, most despised poster here. Lol

Poor lil ol 450 having a meltdown morning. Maybe try a substantive post for once.

Maybe you should try not being a doosh for once?

Maybe you might try posting something substantive for once.

Given that pretty much everything you post is ad hom in nature, which one of us is really the douche? Your inability to render any sort of self-analysis with your whine above is pretty impressive, mind you....

(try correct spelling, Warrior dude, it might add to some gravitas..... 'douche' shouldnt be that bad to do correctly)

There's no rule I have to post anything substantive.

Have a great day rummy.