RE: What would it take to get Penn State?
Most conference moves are due to a set of push and pull factors.
What would cause PSU to sour again on the Big 10? Clearly only something that harms PSU football.
You could make the case that the current divisional alignment harms PSU's chances to play for the B10 title. The top four programs in the East is worse than the situation was in the ACC Atlantic or SEC West.
The west coast addition drops PSU down to 4th in the B10 pecking order behind Ohio State, Michigan, and USC. In fact they may be headed to quasi permanent second tier in the league with Michigan State, Wisky, and UCLA. Is that an issue for them?
B10 Tier 1 - OSU, Michigan, USC
B10 T2 - PSU, Wisky, UCLA
B10 T3 - Purdue, Minn, Neb, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, NW
B10 T4 - MD, Minn, Rutgers
When it comes to B10 expansion you have to ask yourself what do T3 and Y4 get out of Washington or Oregon. I would assert they get nothing, just a trip to Seattle or Eugene and a likely loss.
I would suggest that tier 3 in the Big 10 get more out of adding Syracuse, Kansas, VT, or UVa - the addition of a closer program where they can be fully competitive in football and basketball.
But specifically regarding PSU, I think this is their ideal division:
Miami, West Va, Pitt, Syracuse, and MD. This allows them to be the king of the Northeastern US.
But ESPN has to PAY for it and the ACC has to look something like:
North - Syracuse, Pitt, PSU, MD, Miami, West Va
East - UVa, BC, UNC, NCSU, CU, SC
South - VT, Louis, Duke, WF, GT, FSU,
|