God forbid this man make it to the US Senate, but if he does perhaps he and Pocahontas can strike up an across the aisle friendship -

https://news.yahoo.com/herschel-walker-m...29018.html

(10-12-2022 09:39 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  God forbid this man make it to the US Senate, but if he does perhaps he and Pocahontas can strike up an across the aisle friendship -

https://news.yahoo.com/herschel-walker-m...29018.html

So Fauxahonatas has resigned?

(10-12-2022 09:39 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  God forbid this man make it to the US Senate, but if he does perhaps he and Pocahontas can strike up an across the aisle friendship -

https://news.yahoo.com/herschel-walker-m...29018.html

The irony is you will happily vote for FAR more dangerous people than Walker if they have a D next to their name.

Not to mention the fact that congress is already FILLED with people 100 times more dangerous than him, and a great number of them are in your party.

In fact Walker does not seem like a dangerous candidate at all to me. I don't know if he would make an effective congressman but dangerous to our democracy? Not even close.

I see the title of this thread and immediately think “and?”…. Where’s the rest of the story.

People change their position on issues all the time usually based on a personal experience. That’s why people are generally liberal when they are younger and become more conservative as they gain life experience with age.

In this case Walker could have “got saved”, as many in my family call it. His position would certainly change as a Christian cannot support abortion as a birth control method.

Of course you’ll see liberals try to twist God’s word to fit their warped view of society look no further than liberals trying to use the Bible to support abominations like male pregnancies.

It’s especially enlightening to watch liberals try to use Old Testament Jewish law like the Book of Leviticus to justify their support of abortion. In doing so it only highlights their ignorance of the scripture.

So yes Walker could have paid for an abortion and now stand firmly against it.

(10-13-2022 05:05 AM)CardinalJim Wrote:  So yes Walker could have paid for an abortion and now stand firmly against it.

I frankly don't care or need to know whether he did or didn't. He's opposing racist/socialist/communist Warnock, and that's all I'd need to know if I lived in Georgia.

(10-13-2022 06:00 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-13-2022 05:05 AM)CardinalJim Wrote:  So yes Walker could have paid for an abortion and now stand firmly against it.

I frankly don't care or need to know whether he did or didn't. He's opposing racist/socialist/communist Warnock, and that's all I'd need to know if I lived in Georgia.

+3

That's the most important factor of all.

Its the progressive commies like Warnock that intend to tear down our democracy, its conservatives that want to protect it.

(10-13-2022 05:05 AM)CardinalJim Wrote:  I see the title of this thread and immediately think “and?”…. Where’s the rest of the story.

People change their position on issues all the time usually based on a personal experience. That’s why people are generally liberal when they are younger and become more conservative as they gain life experience with age.

In this case Walker could have “got saved”, as many in my family call it. His position would certainly change as a Christian cannot support abortion as a birth control method.

Of course you’ll see liberals try to twist God’s word to fit their warped view of society look no further than liberals trying to use the Bible to support abominations like male pregnancies.

It’s especially enlightening to watch liberals try to use Old Testament Jewish law like the Book of Leviticus to justify their support of abortion. In doing so it only highlights their ignorance of the scripture.

So yes Walker could have paid for an abortion and now stand firmly against it.

Not really the issue. He is a serial liar who seems incapable of ever telling the truth. If he just merely changed his stance, no issue. But he's denying that he ever was fine with it when he apparently did advocate for it when it suited him.

Now we're condemning people for serial lying?

Biden, Schiff, Pelosi, Kinzinger, et al ALL say "Hold my beer".

(10-13-2022 07:48 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not really the issue. He is a serial liar who seems incapable of ever telling the truth. If he just merely changed his stance, no issue. But he's denying that he ever was fine with it when he apparently did advocate for it when it suited him.

Have you listened to some of the things regularly said in DC? If Walker can’t tell the truth, unfortunately, he’ll fit right in. The truth in DC is whatever the person or party speaking says it is.

All politicians lie. If they tell you they don’t, they’re lying.

Personally I believe a lot of Democrats have a problem with Walker being black. He’s forgotten his place on the plantation. That’s why Democrats hate Black Conservatives like Candace Owen, Keith and Kevin Hodge, Mark Robinson among others.

LBJ was president and he showed us what the Democratic Party really thinks of African Americans. In his own words…





Here’s Bill Clinton, of all people, explaining why Robert Byrd was a member of the KKK. Ironic what Bill says “There are no perfect people and certainly no perfect politicians” And yet Walker is being held to a different standard because he’s black.





Then there’s our president…





As if it could get any worse…





Don’t hold a Black Republican to higher standards than you do White Democrats.