(08-25-2022 12:41 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 12:20 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 09:55 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 09:52 AM)b2b Wrote:  literally... who?

A complete whack job. She once worked with Project Veritas.

I hope that if one of your gangs nuts gets ousted you will have equal glee. I won't though hold my breath.

Why would I be gleeful if someone I wanted to win, lost? And she wasn't the incumbent. However.........

Idk maybe post a Dem you don't like getting primaried? There's got to be one out there right?

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Not a clue. It's pretty rare for democrats to get primaried...and about the same for Republicans. I've only had two members of congress represent me since I started voting. A Democrat in Ohio and a Republican here in Michigan. Neither has ever had a serious challenge in the primary...and not in the general for that matter either.

But again, why would I cheer or be gleeful?

And I'm not really doing either here. The only reason I know anything about this race is because Loomer is basically going insane here. Further, Loomer was not the incumbent, so she was not getting primaried.

So this is not at all akin to whatever it you're talking about.

(08-25-2022 12:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  lulz Tom thinks this is a win.

What on earth are you babbling about?

And I would think you would be happy that another mental case won't be in congress...aren't there enough there already?

(08-25-2022 12:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  lulz Tom thinks this is a win.

He does. What he fails to consider is that unlike his side who will defend anyone with a D next to their name we don't give a rats ass about this woman simply because she has an R next to hers. If she lost then so be it.

Funny how liberals search the news for “stories” like this but never address the current issues ailing most Americans. This is the **** they care about

(08-25-2022 01:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 12:41 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 12:20 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 09:55 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  A complete whack job. She once worked with Project Veritas.

I hope that if one of your gangs nuts gets ousted you will have equal glee. I won't though hold my breath.

Why would I be gleeful if someone I wanted to win, lost? And she wasn't the incumbent. However.........

Idk maybe post a Dem you don't like getting primaried? There's got to be one out there right?

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Not a clue. It's pretty rare for democrats to get primaried...and about the same for Republicans. I've only had two members of congress represent me since I started voting. A Democrat in Ohio and a Republican here in Michigan. Neither has ever had a serious challenge in the primary...and not in the general for that matter either.

But again, why would I cheer or be gleeful?

And I'm not really doing either here. The only reason I know anything about this race is because Loomer is basically going insane here. Further, Loomer was not the incumbent, so she was not getting primaried.

So this is not at all akin to whatever it you're talking about.

Never in a million years would you post about a Liberal loon loosing. That was my initial point that you went over the Golden Gate Bridge to avoid.

(08-25-2022 06:59 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 01:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 12:41 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 12:20 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  I hope that if one of your gangs nuts gets ousted you will have equal glee. I won't though hold my breath.

Why would I be gleeful if someone I wanted to win, lost? And she wasn't the incumbent. However.........

Idk maybe post a Dem you don't like getting primaried? There's got to be one out there right?

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Not a clue. It's pretty rare for democrats to get primaried...and about the same for Republicans. I've only had two members of congress represent me since I started voting. A Democrat in Ohio and a Republican here in Michigan. Neither has ever had a serious challenge in the primary...and not in the general for that matter either.

But again, why would I cheer or be gleeful?

And I'm not really doing either here. The only reason I know anything about this race is because Loomer is basically going insane here. Further, Loomer was not the incumbent, so she was not getting primaried.

So this is not at all akin to whatever it you're talking about.

Never in a million years would you post about a Liberal loon loosing. That was my initial point that you went over the Golden Gate Bridge to avoid.

And I already answered your question. Why would I have glee? And since when is there some requirement that I post about liberal loons? And when have I ever defended any liberal who ranted and cried and claimed an election was stolen by some conspiracy theory? The only equivalent is MAYBE Stacey Abrams, and I don't recall ever defending her.

And as I explained to the other yokels, she wasn't an incumbent, and only lost a primary.

Finally to WTP, I did nothing to "search" this out. Clearly you're not aware of how twitter works.

(08-29-2022 06:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Finally to WTP, I did nothing to "search" this out. Clearly you're not aware of how twitter works.

Maybe stop using Twitter as the main guide for "news."

That is unless you want censorship of legitimate stories and instead a left leaning agenda. Mr. Independent!