Quote:Monkeypox has been spreading worldwide, mainly in communities of men who has sex with men, in recent months, with the World Health Organization declaring a global health emergency in July.
(08-15-2022 05:45 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote: Sir, methinks the tennis orb doth protest too much. I mean what's with the insults, baseless accusations, and virtue signaling? Someone's fake outraged!
He's a tennis guy! He is accustomed to jostling a pair of fuzzy balls! And that's not a backhanded compliment. Especially if he's smart enough to stay out of the alley!
"So, they screwed the Pooch in oh so many different connotations of the phrase! Poor dog! Where are the PETA people when someone really needs them? Oh wait? Peta's piper porked a peck of pickled pooch. They're in on this!
Bwahahahaha! That's funny.
"He's a tennis guy! He is accustomed to jostling a pair of fuzzy balls! And that's not a backhanded compliment. Especially if he's smart enough to stay out of the alley!"
(08-15-2022 05:45 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote: Sir, methinks the tennis orb doth protest too much. I mean what's with the insults, baseless accusations, and virtue signaling? Someone's fake outraged!
He's a tennis guy! He is accustomed to jostling a pair of fuzzy balls! And that's not a backhanded compliment. Especially if he's smart enough to stay out of the alley!
Hey, I like tennis as well. (The sport, of course.) Well, okay. I like women's tennis. Because I like women in short skirts who grunt while hitting a ball with a racket (or racquet for those who aren't American).
Allow traffic to flow in the opposite direction for what the street was originally designed and you get such results. How these Rainbow Frogs infected their dog is concerning, but assuming it was not in the manner most of this disease is transmitted.
(08-15-2022 10:58 PM)banker Wrote: Do unnatural things, get unnatural results. The gays haven’t seemed to pick up on this yet and neither have people that have too many rando partners.
Yet another reason to wait until marriage to even have sex. My wife and I abstained until our wedding night. She is the only sexual partner I've ever had.
And hey, y'all can scoff at that all you want. Waiting until marriage worked for us.
(This post was last modified: 08-16-2022 09:40 AM by GeminiCoog.)
(08-15-2022 10:58 PM)banker Wrote: Do unnatural things, get unnatural results. The gays haven’t seemed to pick up on this yet and neither have people that have too many rando partners.
Yet another reason to wait until marriage to even have sex. My wife and I abstained until our wedding night. She is the only sexual partner I've ever had.
And hey, y'all can scoff at that all you want. Waiting until marriage worked for us.
Yeah, my wife and I went that route too. I was her only sexual partner but I was so dumb I had to have a learners permit before I married her and consummated our marriage. So far it's worked, we've been married for 32 years. I had to teach her though, you know, practice makes perfect in my case.
(08-15-2022 10:58 PM)banker Wrote: Do unnatural things, get unnatural results. The gays haven’t seemed to pick up on this yet and neither have people that have too many rando partners.
Yet another reason to wait until marriage to even have sex. My wife and I abstained until our wedding night. She is the only sexual partner I've ever had.
And hey, y'all can scoff at that all you want. Waiting until marriage worked for us.
Yeah, my wife and I went that route too. I was her only sexual partner but I was so dumb I had to have a learners permit before I married her and consummated our marriage. So far it's worked, we've been married for 32 years. I had to teach her though, you know, practice makes perfect in my case.
it’s all in the ‘rhythm method’ … to both of yaz, kudos and !!!
being reared catholic, my parents were the same … then we moved to the ‘sip where they’re everywhere…
(08-15-2022 10:58 PM)banker Wrote: Do unnatural things, get unnatural results. The gays haven’t seemed to pick up on this yet and neither have people that have too many rando partners.
Yet another reason to wait until marriage to even have sex. My wife and I abstained until our wedding night. She is the only sexual partner I've ever had.
And hey, y'all can scoff at that all you want. Waiting until marriage worked for us.
Yeah, my wife and I went that route too. I was her only sexual partner but I was so dumb I had to have a learners permit before I married her and consummated our marriage. So far it's worked, we've been married for 32 years. I had to teach her though, you know, practice makes perfect in my case.
it’s all in the ‘rhythm method’ … to both of yaz, kudos and !!!
being reared catholic, my parents were the same … then we moved to the ‘sip where they’re everywhere…
@hornyToad
I was raised Southern Baptist. (Well, okay. Really, my church growing up was affiliated with the Baptist General Convention of Texas, now just known as Texas Baptists, but that group still affiliates with the SBC regardless.) We were big on preaching premarital sex was a sin. Heck, any kind of sex other than that between a man and woman who are married was a sin, including gay sex. (We also preached, among other things, that the woman should obey her husband and that the man should love his wife as Christ loved the church. A lot of male "Christians" forget about the second part.) It's quite fitting how this story reminds me of the lessons I was taught during my Southern Baptist upbringing.
(08-15-2022 10:58 PM)banker Wrote: Do unnatural things, get unnatural results. The gays haven’t seemed to pick up on this yet and neither have people that have too many rando partners.
Yet another reason to wait until marriage to even have sex. My wife and I abstained until our wedding night. She is the only sexual partner I've ever had.
And hey, y'all can scoff at that all you want. Waiting until marriage worked for us.
Yeah, my wife and I went that route too. I was her only sexual partner but I was so dumb I had to have a learners permit before I married her and consummated our marriage. So far it's worked, we've been married for 32 years. I had to teach her though, you know, practice makes perfect in my case.
it’s all in the ‘rhythm method’ … to both of yaz, kudos and !!!
being reared catholic, my parents were the same … then we moved to the ‘sip where they’re everywhere…
@hornyToad
I was raised Southern Baptist. (Well, okay. Really, my church growing up was affiliated with the Baptist General Convention of Texas, now just known as Texas Baptists, but that group still affiliates with the SBC regardless.) We were big on preaching premarital sex was a sin. Heck, any kind of sex other than that between a man and woman who are married was a sin, including gay sex. (We also preached, among other things, that the woman should obey her husband and that the man should love his wife as Christ loved the church. A lot of male "Christians" forget about the second part.) It's quite fitting how this story reminds me of the lessons I was taught during my Southern Baptist upbringing.
#FullCircle
#NoWartsOnMyD***
I’m at my final stop … must share this one from the wayback…
the setup - post Rush concert (#2) … 17 yrs old … back then, the legal drinking age was 18 … I made fake IDs for more than I can remember … partied into the wee hrs…
the wake up call - woke up with an ‘Amber’ butt arse nekid on the brown sand as the sun was rising as folk were walking their doggies ltfao … shake her and shouted, “hey sweetheart, we gotta roll, honey!”
no fk’n way one gets away with that, today!
the finale - skip forward to what became jock itch after visiting the Rx! a couple o’ days later … one month later after the hot tub with a hot arse Korean, it was quell time!
#movingPictures @signalsTour
(This post was last modified: 08-16-2022 04:02 PM by stinkfist.)
(08-15-2022 03:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: 1. Monkeypox lesions in the mouth and anal cavities were practically unheard of until this latest round of the infection. In this latest round, the spreading of monkey pox has been almost exclusively attributed to gays and gay orgies.
2. The dog had lesions in his mouth and anus.
The dog subsequently received a positive PCR test result for monkeypox, using samples from the dog’s oral and anal cavity.
3. Gay guy #1 and the dog have the exact same virus in them, with the guy getting infected first. Meaning the guy spread it to the dog.
The Lancet noted that testing results concluded a "100 percent sequence homology" between the virus that infected patient one and the dog.
Look, there is no way to know if they "plugged" the dog, but if you are presenting this as evidence they did then I would say you have a poor case:
"1. Monkeypox lesions in the mouth and anal cavities were practically unheard of until this latest round of the infection. In this latest round, the spreading of monkey pox has been almost exclusively attributed to gays and gay orgies."
Correct as far as I know.
2. The dog had lesions in his mouth and anus.
"The dog subsequently received a positive PCR test result for monkeypox, using samples from the dog’s oral and anal cavity."
Correct as well, but here's where your argument fails, in order to test for the virus they would need to obtain samples from areas that have secretions - which would be those two areas exclusively. The article does not say that the dog had lesions in these areas, just that the swabs were obtained there.
The article also states that the dog had "abdomen postules" and I would venture to guess that it also had lesions on other parts of it body, but it makes sense that they wouldn't have felt the need to shave the dog given the evidence they already had.
3. Gay guy #1 and the dog have the exact same virus in them, with the guy getting infected first. Meaning the guy spread it to the dog.
The Lancet noted that testing results concluded a "100 percent sequence homology" between the virus that infected patient one and the dog.
Yes, Monkeypox is rare enough that it is reasonable to assume that the dog contracted it from it's owners - but this doesn't establish a source of transmission.
Overall, there is not enough information provided to establish how it was transmitted and it's probably a bit of a stretch to assume they plugged the dog (although still possible).
Really shows the level of discourse here when someone asserts they "plugged" their dog and then the guy stating otherwise is piled on because "he can't prove they didn't"
(08-15-2022 03:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: 1. Monkeypox lesions in the mouth and anal cavities were practically unheard of until this latest round of the infection. In this latest round, the spreading of monkey pox has been almost exclusively attributed to gays and gay orgies.
2. The dog had lesions in his mouth and anus.
The dog subsequently received a positive PCR test result for monkeypox, using samples from the dog’s oral and anal cavity.
3. Gay guy #1 and the dog have the exact same virus in them, with the guy getting infected first. Meaning the guy spread it to the dog.
The Lancet noted that testing results concluded a "100 percent sequence homology" between the virus that infected patient one and the dog.
Look, there is no way to know if they "plugged" the dog, but if you are presenting this as evidence they did then I would say you have a poor case:
"1. Monkeypox lesions in the mouth and anal cavities were practically unheard of until this latest round of the infection. In this latest round, the spreading of monkey pox has been almost exclusively attributed to gays and gay orgies."
Correct as far as I know.
2. The dog had lesions in his mouth and anus.
"The dog subsequently received a positive PCR test result for monkeypox, using samples from the dog’s oral and anal cavity."
Correct as well, but here's where your argument fails, in order to test for the virus they would need to obtain samples from areas that have secretions - which would be those two areas exclusively. The article does not say that the dog had lesions in these areas, just that the swabs were obtained there.
The article also states that the dog had "abdomen postules" and I would venture to guess that it also had lesions on other parts of it body, but it makes sense that they wouldn't have felt the need to shave the dog given the evidence they already had.
3. Gay guy #1 and the dog have the exact same virus in them, with the guy getting infected first. Meaning the guy spread it to the dog.
The Lancet noted that testing results concluded a "100 percentsequence homology" between the virus that infected patient one and the dog.
Yes, Monkeypox is rare enough that it is reasonable to assume that the dog contracted it from it's owners - but this doesn't establish a source of transmission.
Overall, there is not enough information provided to establish how it was transmitted and it's probably a bit of a stretch to assume they plugged the dog (although still possible).
Homology
Come on.
Now theyre just frickin with us
(This post was last modified: 08-16-2022 07:37 PM by shere khan.)
(08-15-2022 03:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: 1. Monkeypox lesions in the mouth and anal cavities were practically unheard of until this latest round of the infection. In this latest round, the spreading of monkey pox has been almost exclusively attributed to gays and gay orgies.
2. The dog had lesions in his mouth and anus.
The dog subsequently received a positive PCR test result for monkeypox, using samples from the dog’s oral and anal cavity.
3. Gay guy #1 and the dog have the exact same virus in them, with the guy getting infected first. Meaning the guy spread it to the dog.
The Lancet noted that testing results concluded a "100 percent sequence homology" between the virus that infected patient one and the dog.
Look, there is no way to know if they "plugged" the dog, but if you are presenting this as evidence they did then I would say you have a poor case:
"1. Monkeypox lesions in the mouth and anal cavities were practically unheard of until this latest round of the infection. In this latest round, the spreading of monkey pox has been almost exclusively attributed to gays and gay orgies."
Correct as far as I know.
2. The dog had lesions in his mouth and anus.
"The dog subsequently received a positive PCR test result for monkeypox, using samples from the dog’s oral and anal cavity."
Correct as well, but here's where your argument fails, in order to test for the virus they would need to obtain samples from areas that have secretions - which would be those two areas exclusively. The article does not say that the dog had lesions in these areas, just that the swabs were obtained there.
The article also states that the dog had "abdomen postules" and I would venture to guess that it also had lesions on other parts of it body, but it makes sense that they wouldn't have felt the need to shave the dog given the evidence they already had.
3. Gay guy #1 and the dog have the exact same virus in them, with the guy getting infected first. Meaning the guy spread it to the dog.
The Lancet noted that testing results concluded a "100 percentsequence homology" between the virus that infected patient one and the dog.
Yes, Monkeypox is rare enough that it is reasonable to assume that the dog contracted it from it's owners - but this doesn't establish a source of transmission.
Overall, there is not enough information provided to establish how it was transmitted and it's probably a bit of a stretch to assume they plugged the dog (although still possible).
/
[NEWS] Dog catches monkey pox from French gay owners
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/tjwzClJM6fyEw/giphy.gif)
!!! 
