(08-15-2022 04:37 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 04:29 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  We could start with how "Paki" is a slur, and "Brown Paki" certainly doesn't make it any less of one?

I mean at this point why bother denying it? At least if you're honest that's one respectable trait

Reeeeee

Frick off sensitive suzy

So what. I honestly dont give a shite who is offended anymore.

Deal with it

I never really cared who I offended but these days I'll go out of my way to do it.

Haiti is a great real world example of such a society. Dominican Republic is a great example that includes european genes. Not being racist, being real.

(08-15-2022 05:28 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  If it happens naturally via consensual sex over generations I am not concerned about it. Why would I be?

According to the humanist/atheist view we have already been here for millions of years yet we still have definable races.

So don't hold your breath, wokester.

(08-16-2022 12:46 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 05:28 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  If it happens naturally via consensual sex over generations I am not concerned about it. Why would I be?

According to the humanist/atheist view we have already been here for millions of years yet we still have definable races.

So don't hold your breath, wokester.

Please do tell us the races and the corresponding definitions of the races there, eric.

I always find that it is the true bigots who are able to define races with such ease. Historically they are the first ones to lay down such definitions, such as you note above. Glad to know that it is a given that there are such easily 'definable races' as you state so clearly above.

The Germans of 1938 found that to be a simple exercise, as did the South Africans until the mid 1990s. The CCP is doing a smashup good job of identifying races as we speak today. I am glad you can help us understand and achieve those amazing political and cultural milestones of the 1930's Germans, the 1980's South Africans, and the current CCP.

With you stating 'definable races' is so easily ascertained, let's start simple.

What exactly is a 'black' as a 'definable race', eric?

(08-15-2022 05:28 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  If it happens naturally via consensual sex over generations I am not concerned about it. Why would I be?

But it hasn't happened has it. Blacks and whites have been here since the 1600's. WW are the least likely to marry out. BTW the black guys who are impregnating the fat Becky's who have ankle tats and a newport hanging out of her mouth are doing us a favor.

But the issue is that you leftist social engineers want to, especially in Europe where it isn't going to happen, eliminate the ancestry of natives who have been there for thousands of years ....because you think they will be easier to control.

(08-16-2022 01:30 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-16-2022 12:46 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 05:28 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  If it happens naturally via consensual sex over generations I am not concerned about it. Why would I be?

According to the humanist/atheist view we have already been here for millions of years yet we still have definable races.

So don't hold your breath, wokester.

Please do tell us the races and the corresponding definitions of the races there, eric.

I always find that it is the true bigots who are able to define races with such ease. Historically they are the first ones to lay down such definitions, such as you note above. Glad to know that it is a given that there are such easily 'definable races' as you state so clearly above.

The Germans of 1938 found that to be a simple exercise, as did the South Africans until the mid 1990s. The CCP is doing a smashup good job of identifying races as we speak today. I am glad you can help us understand and achieve those amazing political and cultural milestones of the 1930's Germans, the 1980's South Africans, and the current CCP.

With you stating 'definable races' is so easily ascertained, let's start simple.

What exactly is a 'black' as a 'definable race', eric?

Ask "government" they are the entity that tries to create classifications.

All yall need a book on the basics of human genetics before you look even stupider.

(08-16-2022 01:30 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-16-2022 12:46 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 05:28 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  If it happens naturally via consensual sex over generations I am not concerned about it. Why would I be?

According to the humanist/atheist view we have already been here for millions of years yet we still have definable races.

So don't hold your breath, wokester.

Please do tell us the races and the corresponding definitions of the races there, eric.

I always find that it is the true bigots who are able to define races with such ease. Historically they are the first ones to lay down such definitions, such as you note above. Glad to know that it is a given that there are such easily 'definable races' as you state so clearly above.

The Germans of 1938 found that to be a simple exercise, as did the South Africans until the mid 1990s. The CCP is doing a smashup good job of identifying races as we speak today. I am glad you can help us understand and achieve those amazing political and cultural milestones of the 1930's Germans, the 1980's South Africans, and the current CCP.

With you stating 'definable races' is so easily ascertained, let's start simple.

What exactly is a 'black' as a 'definable race', eric?

Why do I need to define races? That's not the point I'm making.

Here you go again trying way too hard to find a reason to attack and insult people.

The assertion was that races based on skin color (white people specifically) will soon appear. I simply pointed out the fact that hsitory illustrates that is not going to be happening anytime soon. White people of different ethnicities are not going away, nor are blacks of different ethnicities, nor are other skin tones of various ethnicities.

There are going to continue to be white people, black people brown people etc. And there are going to be various mixtures of those skin tones and various ethnicities of each.

If you want to have some argument about how the definition of race has changed over the centuries and millennia and how that breaks down with ethnicy than go right ahead. I did not remotely argue with that point nor was I even referring to that aspect.

I simply pointed out that the specific skin colors like white people, black people, etc. are not going away. Ethnicity or nationality had nothing to do with the point I was making.

There is nothing remotely racist about that at all.

(08-15-2022 08:19 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  I never really cared who I offended but these days I'll go out of my way to do it.

Same. I quit caring about who i offended a long time ago.

(08-16-2022 06:20 AM)Kyle Mack Wrote:  But it hasn't happened has it. Blacks and whites have been here since the 1600's. WW are the least likely to marry out. BTW the black guys who are impregnating the fat Becky's who have ankle tats and a newport hanging out of her mouth are doing us a favor.

But the issue is that you leftist social engineers want to, especially in Europe where it isn't going to happen, eliminate the ancestry of natives who have been there for thousands of years ....because you think they will be easier to control.

That is one of the funniest things I have ever read on this board!!!

(08-16-2022 06:20 AM)Kyle Mack Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 05:28 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  If it happens naturally via consensual sex over generations I am not concerned about it. Why would I be?

But the issue is that you leftist social engineers want to, especially in Europe where it isn't going to happen, eliminate the ancestry of natives who have been there for thousands of years ....because you think they will be easier to control.

No, I just don't care who f**ks who, you weirdo

Forget race. It takes 10's of thousands of years and genetic mutations for that that to change. All the race breeding out races is just pure ignorance. It can be done with genocide but I don't think the world is that far gone.

The real issue is that stupid people are outbreeding smart people for perhaps the first time in human history.


Once again people are distracted by shite that doesnt matter.

How in the world is predicting 'whites will die out naturally over time due to natural breeding & that'll make more Democrats' not racist?????

******* double-standards. **** off lib

BTW Mack's use of Paki was to point out the hypocricy. The Left can use all the slurs they want against the Right & get away w/ it, but type 'I'm going to write a Last Paki book' to prove a point, & he's a racist. **** off. He was using it to prove a point but snowflake pilot couldn't comprehend that.

The Left: "whites are going to die out"
The Right: "that'd be like me writing 'The Last Paki' in Pakistan
The Left: "OMG you said Paki"

**** off, seriously.

Can anyone other than pilot not see that this is clearly being used to make the point he's trying to make?
I should move to pakistan and write a book The Last Brown Paki. (wonder how long I would last before they stoned me t death)

(08-16-2022 08:15 AM)Bronco14 Wrote:  BTW Mack's use of Paki was to point out the hypocricy. The Left can use all the slurs they want against the Right & get away w/ it, but type 'I'm going to write a Last Paki book' to prove a point, & he's a racist. **** off. He was using it to prove a point but snowflake pilot couldn't comprehend that.

The Left: "whites are going to die out"
The Right: "that'd be like me writing 'The Last Paki' in Pakistan
The Left: "OMG you said Paki"

**** off, seriously.

Can anyone other than pilot not see that this is clearly being used to make the point he's trying to make?
I should move to pakistan and write a book The Last Brown Paki. (wonder how long I would last before they stoned me t death)

Mack is a nazi loser whos been banned before for this BS, but go off defending him.

Also you are simply way dumber than me lol

Haiti

(08-16-2022 06:46 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(08-16-2022 01:30 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-16-2022 12:46 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 05:28 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  If it happens naturally via consensual sex over generations I am not concerned about it. Why would I be?

According to the humanist/atheist view we have already been here for millions of years yet we still have definable races.

So don't hold your breath, wokester.

Please do tell us the races and the corresponding definitions of the races there, eric.

I always find that it is the true bigots who are able to define races with such ease. Historically they are the first ones to lay down such definitions, such as you note above. Glad to know that it is a given that there are such easily 'definable races' as you state so clearly above.

The Germans of 1938 found that to be a simple exercise, as did the South Africans until the mid 1990s. The CCP is doing a smashup good job of identifying races as we speak today. I am glad you can help us understand and achieve those amazing political and cultural milestones of the 1930's Germans, the 1980's South Africans, and the current CCP.

With you stating 'definable races' is so easily ascertained, let's start simple.

What exactly is a 'black' as a 'definable race', eric?

Why do I need to define races?

Because you claim there are apparently easily 'definable races'.

So please define them. What is a 'black' person is a good start.

Quote:Here you go again trying way too hard to find a reason to attack and insult people.

Asking you to define a race after you have said there are 'definable races' is attacking? I am asking you to do what you say is achievable.

So, what is a 'black person'?

Quote:The assertion was that races based on skin color (white people specifically) will soon appear. I simply pointed out the fact that hsitory illustrates that is not going to be happening anytime soon. White people of different ethnicities are not going away, nor are blacks of different ethnicities, nor are other skin tones of various ethnicities.

Please tell us what a 'black' is above.

Quote:There are going to continue to be white people, black people brown people etc. And there are going to be various mixtures of those skin tones and various ethnicities of each.

But the now used blur of races was, per your comment 'definable races'.

Please define them.

Quote:I simply pointed out that the specific skin colors like white people, black people, etc. are not going away. Ethnicity or nationality had nothing to do with the point I was making.

Since you jump to the differentiation above, what is the dividing line between 'white people' and 'black people'?

Quote:There is nothing remotely racist about that at all.

Fine. Nothing remotely racist. What is the the distinction between the 'white people' and the 'black people' you make above? Big lips? Nose size? Brown hair? Please do tell.

(08-16-2022 08:34 AM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(08-16-2022 08:15 AM)Bronco14 Wrote:  BTW Mack's use of Paki was to point out the hypocricy. The Left can use all the slurs they want against the Right & get away w/ it, but type 'I'm going to write a Last Paki book' to prove a point, & he's a racist. **** off. He was using it to prove a point but snowflake pilot couldn't comprehend that.

The Left: "whites are going to die out"
The Right: "that'd be like me writing 'The Last Paki' in Pakistan
The Left: "OMG you said Paki"

**** off, seriously.

Can anyone other than pilot not see that this is clearly being used to make the point he's trying to make?
I should move to pakistan and write a book The Last Brown Paki. (wonder how long I would last before they stoned me t death)

Mack is a nazi loser whos been banned before for this BS, but go off defending him.

Also you are simply way dumber than me lol

A national socialist? You mean he is a racist democrat.

Nah you are mistaken

A smart pilot. Bwahahahaha. Smarter than a bus driver....maybe

Good luck.