(08-17-2022 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:06 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 09:34 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 09:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Semantics, the FBI is a governmental police force that indeed has law enforcement capabilities. They were executing a search warrant. They are bound by the same laws as any local blue wearing cop when executing a warrant.

And we simply don't know enough yet to go off the deep end and claim a Constitutional violation. We don't know if the warrant was illegally obtained nor do we know that any right were violated in what was taken. The agents and the government get just as much benefit of the doubt as trump does...or at least they should if you believe in our system of justice.

It's not semantics.. Backing the blue and questioning the execution of a warrant or gathering materials that may or may not be covered by such a warrant and making people go through hoops to make it visible definitely needs to be questioned. I get it, you don't like to question anything for anything you support (see your inflation thread).

I'm not "going off a deep end". It's just weird they were onsite, had no issues, wanted a lock, and then did a raid.

Then they took passports that they weren't supposed to take and then returned them, which makes me question what else they swiped they weren't supposed to swipe along with not wanting people to witness what they were doing, wanting the cameras off, and showing the warrant far off. This is not standard.

So again, I support LEOs but I can question them.

Tom supports Democrats and never questions them.

Buh bye.

Dude, you're just lying.

And if don't know WHY they went back for this "raid" you're just ignorant of how this whole thing went down from start to finish. Dude, they found additional stuff, stuff they issued a subpoena for that trump never complied with! Doesn't that tell you why then went back?

Where did I lie?

Please show me where I lied.

I forget... If it doesn't fit your narrative it's a lie. I forgot you're never dishonest, you've told us so on several occasions.

"Tom supports Democrats and never questions them."

https://csnbbs.com/thread-952619.html

(08-17-2022 10:21 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:06 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 09:34 AM)gdunn Wrote:  It's not semantics.. Backing the blue and questioning the execution of a warrant or gathering materials that may or may not be covered by such a warrant and making people go through hoops to make it visible definitely needs to be questioned. I get it, you don't like to question anything for anything you support (see your inflation thread).

I'm not "going off a deep end". It's just weird they were onsite, had no issues, wanted a lock, and then did a raid.

Then they took passports that they weren't supposed to take and then returned them, which makes me question what else they swiped they weren't supposed to swipe along with not wanting people to witness what they were doing, wanting the cameras off, and showing the warrant far off. This is not standard.

So again, I support LEOs but I can question them.

Tom supports Democrats and never questions them.

Buh bye.

Dude, you're just lying.

And if don't know WHY they went back for this "raid" you're just ignorant of how this whole thing went down from start to finish. Dude, they found additional stuff, stuff they issued a subpoena for that trump never complied with! Doesn't that tell you why then went back?

Where did I lie?

Please show me where I lied.

I forget... If it doesn't fit your narrative it's a lie. I forgot you're never dishonest, you've told us so on several occasions.

"Tom supports Democrats and never questions them."

https://csnbbs.com/thread-952619.html

This is going to go down like an OJ scenario.


The FBI / DOJ / DEMs in general need Trump out of their lives and they are getting desperate as nothing they have tried seems to stick. So you barnstorm his castle and "accidentally" take and reveal damaging information that hurts Trump. Then all that gets thrown out of any possible court proceedings because it was improperly obtained. But mission accomplished - we all know what is there (like we all know OJ killed ANS) but Trump skates due to a technicality.


He is proven guilty in public opinion but never legally found guilty. Dems get to make their much needed dent in his public opinion and Trump is officially neutered (like OJ).

(08-17-2022 10:21 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:06 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 09:34 AM)gdunn Wrote:  It's not semantics.. Backing the blue and questioning the execution of a warrant or gathering materials that may or may not be covered by such a warrant and making people go through hoops to make it visible definitely needs to be questioned. I get it, you don't like to question anything for anything you support (see your inflation thread).

I'm not "going off a deep end". It's just weird they were onsite, had no issues, wanted a lock, and then did a raid.

Then they took passports that they weren't supposed to take and then returned them, which makes me question what else they swiped they weren't supposed to swipe along with not wanting people to witness what they were doing, wanting the cameras off, and showing the warrant far off. This is not standard.

So again, I support LEOs but I can question them.

Tom supports Democrats and never questions them.

Buh bye.

Dude, you're just lying.

And if don't know WHY they went back for this "raid" you're just ignorant of how this whole thing went down from start to finish. Dude, they found additional stuff, stuff they issued a subpoena for that trump never complied with! Doesn't that tell you why then went back?

Where did I lie?

Please show me where I lied.

I forget... If it doesn't fit your narrative it's a lie. I forgot you're never dishonest, you've told us so on several occasions.

"Tom supports Democrats and never questions them."

https://csnbbs.com/thread-952619.html

(08-17-2022 11:01 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:21 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:06 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Dude, you're just lying.

And if don't know WHY they went back for this "raid" you're just ignorant of how this whole thing went down from start to finish. Dude, they found additional stuff, stuff they issued a subpoena for that trump never complied with! Doesn't that tell you why then went back?

Where did I lie?

Please show me where I lied.

I forget... If it doesn't fit your narrative it's a lie. I forgot you're never dishonest, you've told us so on several occasions.

"Tom supports Democrats and never questions them."

https://csnbbs.com/thread-952619.html

lulz

Tom doesn't lie - he just tells his own version of the truth.

(08-17-2022 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  "Tom supports Democrats and never questions them."

It's funny because it's apparently true. I've yet to seen you criticize them but you're all over Trump and Republicans every chance you get.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

(08-17-2022 05:28 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Not mentioned in the article: consequences for this serious procedural breach and violation of rights.

But, of course, what am I saying? Consequences never apply to progressives, nor to their Brownshirt enforcers.

Exactly. To them, the ends justify the means.

(08-17-2022 11:25 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  "Tom supports Democrats and never questions them."

It's funny because it's apparently true. I've yet to seen you criticize them but you're all over Trump and Republicans every chance you get.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

He isn’t even critical of the billions spent on the IRS because his heroes signed off on it. Can’t get more of a brain washed lackey than that. No defense for it. Just my team is beyond reproach.

He doesn’t care if all the leftists cut dirty deals to undermine the American public. To Tommy it’s who it is (Dems ok R’s not ok) not what laws are being compromised and broken.

He is fully complicit with the two tiered Judicial System we see played out over and over.

(08-17-2022 11:18 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Tom doesn't lie - he just tells his own version of the truth.

I think it's called alternative facts

Whatever happened to ole Sean Spicer? Talk about a job right up there with storming the beaches of Normandy. That poor bastard dove head first into the meat grinder 1/20/17

(08-17-2022 11:36 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 05:28 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Not mentioned in the article: consequences for this serious procedural breach and violation of rights.

But, of course, what am I saying? Consequences never apply to progressives, nor to their Brownshirt enforcers.

Exactly. To them, the ends justify the means.

Hence my OJ comparison.