Could a 2 x 28 or a 2 x 30 Setup Be Sufficient?
Would it be easier or more profitable to move to just 2 conferences with no tweener and let each school moving up to give one year current conference salary into a pool for any conference mates not making the move.
For instance in the 2 x 30 model 13 ACC schools would pay ~ 35 million to fund which would be split by BC and Wake.
The PAC, ACC, and B12 would vote to dissolve or simply not sign a new GOR.
2 x 28
B1G:
Maryland, Notre Dame, Penn State, Pittsburgh, Purdue, Rutgers, Syracuse
Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Michigan State, Northwestern, Ohio State, Wisconsin
Colorado, Iowa, Iowa State, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska
Arizona, California, California Los Angeles, Oregon, Southern Cal, Stanford, Washington
SEC:
Duke, Kentucky, Louisville, North Carolina, N.C. State, Virginia, Virginia Tech
Clemson, Florida, Florida State, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Miami, South Carolina
Alabama, Auburn, Louisiana State, Mississippi, Mississippi State, Tennessee, Vanderbilt
Arkansas, Baylor, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech
2 x 30
B1G:
Maryland, Notre Dame, Pittsburgh, Rutgers, Syracuse
Illinois, Indiana, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue
Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Northwestern, Wisconsin
Iowa, Iowa State, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
Arizona, Arizona State, California Los Angeles, Colorado, Southern Cal
California, Oregon, Stanford, Utah, Washington
SEC:
Duke, North Carolina, N.C. State, Virginia, Virginia Tech
Kentucky, Louisville, Tennessee, Vanderbilt, West Virginia
Clemson, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Florida, South Carolina
Alabama, Auburn, Florida State, Miami, Mississippi State
Arkansas, Baylor, Louisiana State, Mississippi, Texas A&M
Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas Christian, Texas Tech
Each set up has merit. I really like the groupings on the 2 x 28.
(This post was last modified: 07-27-2022 06:20 AM by JRsec.)
|