(03-26-2023 04:23 PM)Garrettabc Wrote: It’s ok to finish last in the conference standings, but FSU, UL, ND, GT, BC were complete dog crap. That’s unacceptable, it’s not from a lack effort, most of us will get back to respectability soon. I have a feeling Phillip’s comments were slowly building by trends of past years and with UNC snubbed, that was the straw that broke the camel’s back.
I have noticed that in the two money sports, the playoff selection system does seem to screw over the ACC. In one “we want the best teams”, the other “we want to be more inclusive to the non power conferences”.
My observations:
1. Clemson and NC State in particular play 1-3 piss poor ratings dog each year. It bites them in the ass every other year. Syracuse also did it this year.
CU dogs - 331, 321, 313, 269, 258, 255 before Louisville and ND that's a total of 9 sub 250 games.
NCSU dogs - 335, 325, 316, 290 before Louis and ND.
Syracuse dogs - 310, 296, 293 and 251 before ND and Louis.
That's a problem. Don't schedule sub 250 PROGRAMS.
Why do they do it? Now the meat of the problem. Distrust of ACC officiating in part of the problem. State and Clemson expect to get screwed against a top team if the game is played at home. With Syracuse I think it was Boehiem in a time warp.
2. If you look this season, many teams made hay playing and winning 75-150 games. No more than two ACC programs can really stink in a year. 5 is too many.
3. But how was UNC-Ch snubbed when Bubba was on the committee? They were not snubbed, they had quit and the committee knew that. It happens.
4. Syracuse pulled the same deal that FSU did with Bobby B. That's hurt the league's perception.
5. Some of the ACC schools are horrible at self promotion. UNC-Ch should teach an annual class in it to the rest.