Quote:Failed Supreme Court nominee and current Attorney General Merrick Garland is weighing in on Friday's landmark ruling overturning Roe v. Wade and returning abortion law to the states.

“The Justice Department strongly disagrees with the Court’s decision. This decision deals a devastating blow to reproductive freedom in the United States. It will have an immediate and irreversible impact on the lives of people across the country. And it will be greatly disproportionate in its effect – with the greatest burdens felt by people of color and those of limited financial means," Garland said.

Garland is vowing to deploy Department of Justice resources to help get women abortions in states where the procedure will remain legal.

“We recognize that traveling to obtain reproductive care may not be feasible in many circumstances. But under bedrock constitutional principles, women who reside in states that have banned access to comprehensive reproductive care must remain free to seek that care in states where it is legal," Garland said.

“The Justice Department will work tirelessly to protect and advance reproductive freedom," he continued. “Under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, the Department will continue to protect healthcare providers and individuals seeking reproductive health services in states where those services remain legal."

Bizarrely, Garland also called on Congress to pass pro-abortion legislation. DOJ is supposed to be a non-partisan institution focused on upholding the law, not advocating for preferred policy or laws based on political preferences.

“The Department strongly supports efforts by Congress to codify Americans’ reproductive rights, which it retains the authority to do. We also support other legislative efforts to ensure access to comprehensive reproductive services," he said. "And we stand ready to work with other arms of the federal government that seek to use their lawful authorities to protect and preserve access to reproductive care. In particular, the FDA has approved the use of the medication Mifepristone. States may not ban Mifepristone based on disagreement with the FDA’s expert judgment about its safety and efficacy."

"The Justice Department will use every tool at our disposal to protect reproductive freedom. And we will not waver from this Department’s founding responsibility to protect the civil rights of all Americans,” he concluded.

Link

Really seditious

They're losing. They're terrified.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

“The Department strongly supports efforts by Congress to codify Americans’ reproductive rights, which it retains the authority to do."

No. It does not. That's the whole point of the ruling.

for this, I cannot thank the turtle from KY enough for stalling on this fkbag...

close second award: #henceDJTappointees

(06-24-2022 02:48 PM)b2b Wrote:  They're losing. They're terrified.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

losers always are out of the gate ... it's when the losers overwhelm the winners is when the real 'fear factoring' begins....

(06-24-2022 02:49 PM)Claw Wrote:  “The Department strongly supports efforts by Congress to codify Americans’ reproductive rights, which it retains the authority to do."

No. It does not. That's the whole point of the ruling.

The guy doesnt get it. He really does believe federal can override items granted to the states.

Ok Merrick.

Your opinion means shite.

(06-24-2022 03:18 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Ok Merrick.

Your opinion means shite.

Mitch has been a politician in some form since 1977. He hasn’t done much in 45 years that I agree with other than block crazy bills from the House from becoming law.

His decision to not allow Merrick Garland to begin the process to be confirmed to the SCOTUS may singularly stand as the most important thing he has ever not done in his political career.

At the time it was pure partisan politics but with each “crisis” with this administration Garland is proving he lacks the temperament or depth to serve on the SCOTUS.

(06-24-2022 04:00 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 03:18 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Ok Merrick.

Your opinion means shite.

Mitch has been a politician in some form since 1977. He hasn’t done much in 45 years that I agree with other than block crazy bills from the House from becoming law.

His decision to not allow Merrick Garland to begin the process to be confirmed to the SCOTUS may singularly stand as the most important thing he has ever not done in his political career.

At the time it was pure partisan politics but with each “crisis” with this administration Garland is proving he lacks the temperament or depth to serve on the SCOTUS.

I basically stated such a couple of hrs. ago ... it's his version of hitting for the cycle in back-to-back games....

It's not the job of the DOJ to have an opinion on the law. Political hacks, all.

impeach and remove him.

(06-24-2022 04:10 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  It's not the job of the DOJ to have an opinion on the law. Political hacks, all.

Many of the Obama appointed judges are “activist judges”. Instead of weighing evidence and making a decision based on established Constitutional law, the Obama appointees like to craft their rulings not on law but on their interpretation of the Constitution.

Thankfully he left 104 judgeships empty or it could be worse.

Garland is a satanic marxist. So is his daughter and son in law who peddle crt training for a living.

Can anyone imagine the response of the loons if Barr had issued a statement this purely political and nakedly partisan?

The howls for impeachment and removal would be loud enough to hear in Dubuque.

"Moderate" Merrick my left one.

(06-24-2022 04:00 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 03:18 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Ok Merrick.

Your opinion means shite.

Mitch has been a politician in some form since 1977. He hasn’t done much in 45 years that I agree with other than block crazy bills from the House from becoming law.

His decision to not allow Merrick Garland to begin the process to be confirmed to the SCOTUS may singularly stand as the most important thing he has ever not done in his political career.

At the time it was pure partisan politics but with each “crisis” with this administration Garland is proving he lacks the temperament or depth to serve on the SCOTUS.

He makes Holder look like a good AG.

Dear Merrick,

There are three branches of US government, devised by our founding fathers to have checks and balances on the others. Nobody gives a **** what you think of Roe v Wade or its repeal, as the Supremes ruled that the original ruling was outside the bounds of Constitutional law. That is the way our government works, and for the record, there is no clause or amendment in the Constitution that calls abortion or anything resembling it a "right", which means the decision on such activity is reserved to the states. Not upset that this ruling rubs your mangina in an abrasive manner, but you have not the power to change the ruling or its ramifications. And thank goodness that Cocaine Mitch prevented your hearing for a Supreme Justice, as you are not worthy.