(06-13-2022 12:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Part of me wants to let the A.D. j@ack@ss stumble and stagger through 4 years so those who voted for that fool truly endure a full dose of Democratic insanity. But it is probably best to stop the bleeding after the red wave sweep in November.

Quietly let him know he can step down in late January due to health reasons and avoid being humiliated. If he refuses, then the Republican controlled House will first impeach Biden in summer 2023, then investigate Hunter in spring 2024 and that problematic laptop - with key exposures laid out in prime time. Then the House will impeach Biden a second time in summer 2024 just before the hard campaigning in fall. All sorts of fun stuff to lay out for the country.

And then what? What would be the point of all that? To put Kamala in charge while DC falls further into chaos? I mean... there's no good outcome to any scenario here. I'd just rather the Republicans be all about issues, not battles that can't be won / do nothing for the populace.

(06-13-2022 12:19 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-13-2022 12:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Part of me wants to let the A.D. j@ack@ss stumble and stagger through 4 years so those who voted for that fool truly endure a full dose of Democratic insanity. But it is probably best to stop the bleeding after the red wave sweep in November.

Quietly let him know he can step down in late January due to health reasons and avoid being humiliated. If he refuses, then the Republican controlled House will first impeach Biden in summer 2023, then investigate Hunter in spring 2024 and that problematic laptop - with key exposures laid out in prime time. Then the House will impeach Biden a second time in summer 2024 just before the hard campaigning in fall. All sorts of fun stuff to lay out for the country.

And then what? What would be the point of all that? To put Kamala in charge while DC falls further into chaos? I mean... there's no good outcome to any scenario here. I'd just rather the Republicans be all about issues, not battles that can't be won / do nothing for the populace.

Doesnt matter. Joe---Khamala---both are incompetent idiots. After the mid-terms the solidly Red congress will be able to block any idiocy either attempts. They would be relatively harmless lame ducks until the 2024 election.

(06-13-2022 12:08 PM)Claw Wrote:  I think failure to enforce the immigration laws would be ample cause for impeachment.

It's there. Whether they choose to do it or not I have no idea.

That's the only thing that I see that justifies it.

There's probably stuff on Hunter's laptop, but that evidence is a long way from being fully developed.

(06-13-2022 12:22 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-13-2022 12:19 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-13-2022 12:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Part of me wants to let the A.D. j@ack@ss stumble and stagger through 4 years so those who voted for that fool truly endure a full dose of Democratic insanity. But it is probably best to stop the bleeding after the red wave sweep in November.

Quietly let him know he can step down in late January due to health reasons and avoid being humiliated. If he refuses, then the Republican controlled House will first impeach Biden in summer 2023, then investigate Hunter in spring 2024 and that problematic laptop - with key exposures laid out in prime time. Then the House will impeach Biden a second time in summer 2024 just before the hard campaigning in fall. All sorts of fun stuff to lay out for the country.

And then what? What would be the point of all that? To put Kamala in charge while DC falls further into chaos? I mean... there's no good outcome to any scenario here. I'd just rather the Republicans be all about issues, not battles that can't be won / do nothing for the populace.

Doesnt matter. Joe---Khamala---both are incompetent idiots. After the mid-terms the solidly Red congress will be able to block any idiocy either attempts. They would be relatively harmless lame ducks until the 2024 election.

I don't disagree but they (GOP) would get a lot more mileage (pun intended) if they'd how America they can actually provide some solutions to the problems we're facing. I don't want people who are just "not Biden". I want people to present him with workable solutions that the everyman can understand and force the left to say no to them.

(06-13-2022 12:22 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-13-2022 12:19 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-13-2022 12:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Part of me wants to let the A.D. j@ack@ss stumble and stagger through 4 years so those who voted for that fool truly endure a full dose of Democratic insanity. But it is probably best to stop the bleeding after the red wave sweep in November.

Quietly let him know he can step down in late January due to health reasons and avoid being humiliated. If he refuses, then the Republican controlled House will first impeach Biden in summer 2023, then investigate Hunter in spring 2024 and that problematic laptop - with key exposures laid out in prime time. Then the House will impeach Biden a second time in summer 2024 just before the hard campaigning in fall. All sorts of fun stuff to lay out for the country.

And then what? What would be the point of all that? To put Kamala in charge while DC falls further into chaos? I mean... there's no good outcome to any scenario here. I'd just rather the Republicans be all about issues, not battles that can't be won / do nothing for the populace.

Doesnt matter. Joe---Khamala---both are incompetent idiots. After the mid-terms the solidly Red congress will be able to block any idiocy either attempts. They would be relatively harmless lame ducks until the 2024 election.

If they would do that great, but they won't, they'll want to try and work with the administration.

Impeach Joe on refusing to allow the US to pump its own oil, as that is a direct national security risk. Also, most americans would get behind that. (Except for the elites who dont care how much gas is, and a few 2 brain celled dipshits on this site. )

That would put immense pressure on senators to either remove him, or refuse to remove him and have to deal with their voters.

If you remove Joe then simply wash, rinse, and repeat with blowhard.

(06-13-2022 12:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Part of me wants to let the A.D. j@ack@ss stumble and stagger through 4 years so those who voted for that fool truly endure a full dose of Democratic insanity. But it is probably best to stop the bleeding after the red wave sweep in November.

Quietly let him know he can step down in late January due to health reasons and avoid being humiliated. If he refuses, then the Republican controlled House will first impeach Biden in summer 2023, then investigate Hunter in spring 2024 and that problematic laptop - with key exposures laid out in prime time. Then the House will impeach Biden a second time in summer 2024 just before the hard campaigning in fall. All sorts of fun stuff to lay out for the country.

I am not sure I want "Ms. Word Salad" at the podium, but as long as the R's have the majority on House and Senate, she cannot do too much harm as a lame duck president I suppose.

Please no. Keep Kamala Harris as far away from the Oval Office as possible.

If I were in congress I would not vote to impeach, convict, or 25th Amendment Joe Biden if he were crawling around on the floor slobbering on my shoes. No way he can possibly be as bad as Kamala the ****.

(06-13-2022 04:16 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  Please no. Keep Kamala Harris as far away from the Oval Office as possible.

Impeachment never means removal from office.

Impeachment will never come to the table. Remember that if the Reps take over the house and senate Mitch will be the majority leader and McCarthy who is as bad as the old Mitch will do nothing to rock the boat. They're Rinos for Pete's sake, it's all about the status quo.

Keep him in office because the alternative isn't any better and could prove to be worst. Just keep them in check with your legislative powers. It'll be hard but if he keeps screwing up the country even die-hard Demons will vote to get him out if he runs. That was funny, that old man can't walk much less run.

LOL I know you know what I mean.

Post Carter

8 years of Reagan, 4 more of Bush

The Biden copy is coming

Enjoy it now filth

The president isn’t the problem, unless of course you expect him to actually do the job of president. You see the poor guy in the Oval Office is a shell, an empty husk. He’s not making any decisions. You don’t impeach a puppet. You file charges against those who have betrayed the public trust and violated their oath.

I would rather see Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters among others tried and convicted of treason and sentenced to life in Leavenworth.

Since we all know the limp dick Republicans in the House and Senate won’t have the balls to seek justice, nothing will happen.

They’ll go back to wasting the country’s time and money as they always do.

(06-13-2022 12:28 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-13-2022 12:22 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-13-2022 12:19 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-13-2022 12:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Part of me wants to let the A.D. j@ack@ss stumble and stagger through 4 years so those who voted for that fool truly endure a full dose of Democratic insanity. But it is probably best to stop the bleeding after the red wave sweep in November.

Quietly let him know he can step down in late January due to health reasons and avoid being humiliated. If he refuses, then the Republican controlled House will first impeach Biden in summer 2023, then investigate Hunter in spring 2024 and that problematic laptop - with key exposures laid out in prime time. Then the House will impeach Biden a second time in summer 2024 just before the hard campaigning in fall. All sorts of fun stuff to lay out for the country.

And then what? What would be the point of all that? To put Kamala in charge while DC falls further into chaos? I mean... there's no good outcome to any scenario here. I'd just rather the Republicans be all about issues, not battles that can't be won / do nothing for the populace.

Doesnt matter. Joe---Khamala---both are incompetent idiots. After the mid-terms the solidly Red congress will be able to block any idiocy either attempts. They would be relatively harmless lame ducks until the 2024 election.

I don't disagree but they (GOP) would get a lot more mileage (pun intended) if they'd how America they can actually provide some solutions to the problems we're facing. I don't want people who are just "not Biden". I want people to present him with workable solutions that the everyman can understand and force the left to say no to them.

You dont really want that because that is almost exactly what we had from 2016-2020 . In another thread you said that was a mistake by republican voters.

You and a lot of republicans only want someone that AGREES with THEM.

(06-13-2022 06:58 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  The president isn’t the problem, unless of course you expect him to actually do the job of president. You see the poor guy in the Oval Office is a shell, an empty husk. He’s not making any decisions. You don’t impeach a puppet. You file charges against those who have betrayed the public trust and violated their oath.
I would rather see Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters among others tried and convicted of treason and sentenced to life in Leavenworth.
Since we all know the limp dick Republicans in the House and Senate won’t have the balls to seek justice, nothing will happen.
They’ll go back to wasting the country’s time and money as they always do.

And that is the real problem.

Instead of finding 10 republicans to go along with the democrats on "gun control," why not come up with a republican alternative. I see two prongs that would prevent more mass shootings than any "gun control" ever would. Basically, any time a nut case with a gun gets inside of a school, a bunch of people are going to die, regardless of the kind of gun.

1) We have lots of guns, including high-powered rifles. We have pretty much always had them, but no significant mass shootings until we shut down most mental hospitals and started trying to mainstream nutcases into the general population. Bring back mental hospitals and take the nutcases out of circulation. Don't just not let them buy guns, take them out of circulation.

2) Require a school or any other "gun free zone" to have controlled access enforced by armed security.

"I would rather see Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters among others tried and convicted of treason and sentenced to life in Leavenworth."


^^^ESTO!

(06-13-2022 07:09 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  "I would rather see Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters among others tried and convicted of treason and sentenced to life in Leavenworth."
^^^ESTO!

So would I.

I just don't see the value in the exercise of impeachment if there aren't enough votes to convict. Otherwise we can expect the president to be impeached annually.

(06-13-2022 07:45 PM)chargeradio Wrote:  I just don't see the value in the exercise of impeachment if there aren't enough votes to convict. Otherwise we can expect the president to be impeached annually.

Those are two different things (charge/trial) and would you feel the same way if someone committed a crime against you but the DA didnt think he would get a conviction. So he didnt press charges?

But I agree impeachment should not be used as a tool try and weaken the other side. In all honesty Trump might be the only person to hold that office...

that has never committed a crime. If all the other presidents were held to the same level of investigation by the congress, by the media, by social media, and by the most powerful law forces in the world, and you can add to that the most powerful spies in the world. I dont think one of them would have came out clean.

If Biden committed something that is impeachable and serious (I believe he has) then conviction should not come into the though of impeachment.