(06-15-2022 07:05 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-14-2022 01:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-14-2022 01:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-14-2022 01:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-14-2022 12:22 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Talk about performance art! Ted knows full well that she can't talk about whether there are undercover agents working in the field with the Proud Boys or The Oathkeepers, etc. in a public hearing.

What a clown.

But hey, red meat for you conspiratorial whackadoodles...the whisper heard round the world...oh my gerd!!!! And there's no credible reporting anywhere that his alleged whisperer has any affiliation with the FBI whatsoever, and Ted knows this as well.

lol...."undercover" informants cant organize and lead a criminal enterprise in the hope of entrapping people. One of the people on camera giving order to storm the capital is apparently an FBI asset.

lol...there's no evidence any informants led a criminal enterprise or entrapped anyone on January 6th. Just as there's no evidence this whisperer was an FBI asset, much less what he even whispered to this person.

The lengths you to which you need to go to justify the Capitol attack is simply stunning.

"I don't have any evidence that guy was working for the FBI or what he whispered to that person, but I just know for a fact that he was was working for the FBI and that he told that one person to take down a barricade and that caused 100's of people to then commit crimes..."

How pathetic, really.

So explain why he has not been arrested and imprisoned as people simply trespassing have been. He is without question an instigator. The FBI won’t even answer a single question about him.

You leftist used to hate the FBI, CIA and the military industrial complex. For some reason someone has told y’all to embrace them and now you’ve come full circle.

Because there's nothing to charge him with. And no, they did not arrest or charge EVERY person anywhere near the Capitol on January 6th.

And the FBI won't talk about anyone in his situation.

The only thing I'm embracing is known facts here. Until there's some charge against the guy, he's nothing. Just points to how pathetic that stunt by Ted really was.

Jan 6 committee and their morons are trying hard to tell us that Loudermilk led an insurrection tour through the capitol that day.

(06-15-2022 10:51 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Jan 6 committee and their morons are trying hard to tell us that Loudermilk led an insurrection tour through the capitol that day.

Hear Ye, Hear Ye....

Land sale in the everglades - CALL NOW!

This is pretty funny...a whisper apparently started the whole thing, but a tour where "tourists" photo'd the windows where they broke in? Meh...nothing to see here...

(06-15-2022 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This is pretty funny...a whisper apparently started the whole thing, but a tour where "tourists" photo'd the windows where they broke in? Meh...nothing to see here...

lol----Odd that when it suits your narrative your willing to jump the wildest Alex Jones style conclusions based on virtually no actual evidence. We have absolutely NO idea what they are doing. The fact is----we cant actually "see" what they are taking pictures of. Are they taking pictures of "a stairway"---or are they taking pictures of a congressman going up the stairway who's just out of sight. Are they taking pictures of a hallway---or are they taking pictures of a congressman talking to members of their delegation IN the hallway. Are they taking pictures of windows---or are they taking pictures of someone standing in front of the windows? I have no idea---because in what has become a completely expected trend by this point---adequate evidence to show the whole story has not been presented. The place is literally filled with cameras. Those security camera angles showing what they are seeing are available. Why arent they showing them? Now lets be more analytical---if its really a tour for recon purposes---why do you need 6 people taking pictures of same windows all from the exact same angle at the exact same time? My guess is they are all taking a pic at the same time because they are taking a picture of someone they know who is standing there at that moment.

(06-15-2022 12:37 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This is pretty funny...a whisper apparently started the whole thing, but a tour where "tourists" photo'd the windows where they broke in? Meh...nothing to see here...

lol----Odd that when it suits your narrative your willing to jump the wildest mother Jones conclusions based on virtually no actual evidence. We have absolutely NO idea what they are doing. The fact is----we cant actually "see" what they are taking pictures of. Are they taking pictures of "a stairway"---or are they taking pictures of a congressman going up the stairway who's just out of sight. Are they taking pictures of a hallway---or are they taking pictures of a congressman talking to members of their delegation IN the hallway.

Dude, that's why it's funny...get it? You have two posters here and a tweeter saying it was just a tourist visit...you know...no evidence it wasn't. And at the same time, they're claiming the whisperer was an FBI informant who either started it or egged it on...with no evidence.

I, on the other hand, haven't jumped to any conclusion here. I don't know whether Loudermilk did anything wrong or whether this was just a harmless tourist visit. I'm guessing we might find out tomorrow though . Just as I don't know if the whisperer was working for the FBI or not, but he did testify under oath to the committee that he wasn't and the FBI has not confirmed he works for them either, just as they haven't charged him with anything. So at this point, there's NOTHING to say he's a plant or an instigator.

(06-15-2022 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This is pretty funny...a whisper apparently started the whole thing, but a tour where "tourists" photo'd the windows where they broke in? Meh...nothing to see here...

Lol,why would you take a photo from the inside of a window you'd need to break into from the outside? Do y'all even think about the ridiculous things you parrot?

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

(06-15-2022 12:42 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:37 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This is pretty funny...a whisper apparently started the whole thing, but a tour where "tourists" photo'd the windows where they broke in? Meh...nothing to see here...

lol----Odd that when it suits your narrative your willing to jump the wildest mother Jones conclusions based on virtually no actual evidence. We have absolutely NO idea what they are doing. The fact is----we cant actually "see" what they are taking pictures of. Are they taking pictures of "a stairway"---or are they taking pictures of a congressman going up the stairway who's just out of sight. Are they taking pictures of a hallway---or are they taking pictures of a congressman talking to members of their delegation IN the hallway.

Dude, that's why it's funny...get it? You have two posters here and a tweeter saying it was just a tourist visit...you know...no evidence it wasn't. And at the same time, they're claiming the whisperer was an FBI informant who either started it or egged it on...with no evidence.

I, on the other hand, haven't jumped to any conclusion here. I don't know whether Loudermilk did anything wrong or whether this was just a harmless tourist visit. I'm guessing we might find out tomorrow though . Just as I don't know if the whisperer was working for the FBI or not, but he did testify under oath to the committee that he wasn't and the FBI has not confirmed he works for them either, just as they haven't charged him with anything. So at this point, there's NOTHING to say he's a plant or an instigator.

Then you're far more intelligent than the Committee---because they are totally serious about their belief this is somehow "proof" of their essentially groundless allegations.

(06-15-2022 12:54 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This is pretty funny...a whisper apparently started the whole thing, but a tour where "tourists" photo'd the windows where they broke in? Meh...nothing to see here...

Lol,why would you take a photo from the inside of a window you'd need to break into from the outside? Do y'all even think about the ridiculous things you parrot?

I dunno...I've been in the Capitol...and never once thought, gee, look at that plain window...I think I'll take a photo! Look at the door...I think I'll take a photo. Nevermind all those cool statues...look at that plain outer window!!

Again, as I said, I don't know if this means anything...and it probably didn't...but the committee released it...tends to point to the fact that they have a little more evidence to present here.

(06-15-2022 12:55 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:42 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:37 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This is pretty funny...a whisper apparently started the whole thing, but a tour where "tourists" photo'd the windows where they broke in? Meh...nothing to see here...

lol----Odd that when it suits your narrative your willing to jump the wildest mother Jones conclusions based on virtually no actual evidence. We have absolutely NO idea what they are doing. The fact is----we cant actually "see" what they are taking pictures of. Are they taking pictures of "a stairway"---or are they taking pictures of a congressman going up the stairway who's just out of sight. Are they taking pictures of a hallway---or are they taking pictures of a congressman talking to members of their delegation IN the hallway.

Dude, that's why it's funny...get it? You have two posters here and a tweeter saying it was just a tourist visit...you know...no evidence it wasn't. And at the same time, they're claiming the whisperer was an FBI informant who either started it or egged it on...with no evidence.

I, on the other hand, haven't jumped to any conclusion here. I don't know whether Loudermilk did anything wrong or whether this was just a harmless tourist visit. I'm guessing we might find out tomorrow though . Just as I don't know if the whisperer was working for the FBI or not, but he did testify under oath to the committee that he wasn't and the FBI has not confirmed he works for them either, just as they haven't charged him with anything. So at this point, there's NOTHING to say he's a plant or an instigator.

Then you're far more intelligent than the Committee---because they are totally serious about their belief this is somehow "proof" of their essentially groundless allegations.

We shall see.

(06-15-2022 12:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

ALSO HAPPENING NOW: BANNON TO SUBPOENA PELOSI

lol---Nancy and Adam Schiff For Brains getting subpoenas? This trial will never happen. Watch and see.

(06-15-2022 02:02 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  lol---Nancy and Adam Schiff For Brains getting subpoenas? This trial will never happen. Watch and see.

They'll plead the fifth to all questions.

(06-15-2022 01:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:54 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-15-2022 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This is pretty funny...a whisper apparently started the whole thing, but a tour where "tourists" photo'd the windows where they broke in? Meh...nothing to see here...

Lol,why would you take a photo from the inside of a window you'd need to break into from the outside? Do y'all even think about the ridiculous things you parrot?

I dunno...I've been in the Capitol...and never once thought, gee, look at that plain window...I think I'll take a photo! Look at the door...I think I'll take a photo. Nevermind all those cool statues...look at that plain outer window!!

Again, as I said, I don't know if this means anything...and it probably didn't...but the committee released it...tends to point to the fact that they have a little more evidence to present here.

So it turns out the released video has already been investigated by Capital Police and they found it to be a big nothing. The Committee has linked it to another person who made some threatening comments on social media (basically similar to what Schemer said about Kavenaugh)---but the guy who made the comments wasnt part of the riot and never entered the capital---so that was another nothing-burger. Yet---the Committee is trying to use the two together to craft a narrative that is essentially fiction---which frankly----is a perfect microcosm of this entire farce of a "hearing".

(06-15-2022 02:02 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  lol---Nancy and Adam Schiff For Brains getting subpoenas? This trial will never happen. Watch and see.

That's because Bannon's team will inquire about the security arrangements and how Pelosi and Mayor Bowser declined Nat. Guard troops offered by Trump. This is what Pelosi and team said will NOT be permitted during the Jan 6 kangaroo court proceedings.

Schiff for brains always says he has evidence, until it is time to produce it.