Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Walleye Attendance vs. UT MBB
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Springboromark Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,640
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 33
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Walleye Attendance vs. UT MBB
Yet Toledo is leading the league in attendance. They're maybe other arenas in the ECHL that are bigger but they don't fannies in the seats like the Walleye do.
04-22-2022 08:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FMRocket Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,095
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 88
I Root For: UT Blue & Gold
Location: Perrysburg, Ohio
Post: #22
RE: Walleye Attendance vs. UT MBB
[quote='Springboromark' pid='18206296' dateline='1650676829']
Yet Toledo is leading the league in attendance. They're maybe other arenas in the ECHL that are bigger but they don't fannies in the seats like the Walleye do.

My point is, with a larger Huntington Center, Toledo Walleye would probably average at least 1000 more in a 9,000 seat arena...
04-22-2022 08:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofToledoFans Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,690
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Toledo and G5
Location:
Post: #23
RE: Walleye Attendance vs. UT MBB
Ohio leads the MAC in attendance. Its said on social media a lot that we do and it isnt true. We lead in percentage of capacity but not outright. Considering a much less popular sport is close (UT WBB), we could and should have more for mbb. I do think this partulicular season was an odd ball for home MAC games and only had 3 Saturday homies in MAC play.
(This post was last modified: 04-23-2022 02:10 PM by UofToledoFans.)
04-23-2022 02:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MidnightBlueGold Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,359
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 45
I Root For: TOL-EDO
Location: The Glass Bowl
Post: #24
RE: Walleye Attendance vs. UT MBB
(04-23-2022 02:09 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Ohio leads the MAC in attendance. Its said on social media a lot that we do and it isnt true. We lead in percentage of capacity but not outright. Considering a much less popular sport is close (UT WBB), we could and should have more for mbb. I do think this partulicular season was an odd ball for home MAC games and only had 3 Saturday homies in MAC play.

He was taking about the Walleye leading the league in attendance, not UT MBB.
04-23-2022 08:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Springboromark Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,640
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 33
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Walleye Attendance vs. UT MBB
I don't know if the Walleye could average 9000 a game in a bigger venue. Surely the ownership would have thought this out if they really believe in those numbers. If I am not mistaken, wasn't it mayor Finkbindner (sp) that wanted Toledo hockey to be on this side of the river instead of staying in east Toledo ? If they had located over there, perhaps a bigger arena would have been possible ?
04-23-2022 09:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eastisbest Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,590
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 42
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Walleye Attendance vs. UT MBB
(04-23-2022 09:08 PM)Springboromark Wrote:  I don't know if the Walleye could average 9000 a game in a bigger venue. Surely the ownership would have thought this out if they really believe in those numbers. If I am not mistaken, wasn't it mayor Finkbindner (sp) that wanted Toledo hockey to be on this side of the river instead of staying in east Toledo ? If they had located over there, perhaps a bigger arena would have been possible ?

The owndership of the Walleye (Mud Hens Corp) is different than the ownership of the Huntington (Lucas County). I don't know what influence they did or did not have.

My presumption it had more to do with relieving whoever was saddled with unusable downtown real estate. I couldnt for the life of me figure why they were so under building what was in Dayton, Grand Rapids and Ft. Wayne.

There were much better locations of open land not far, more visible and assesible from the hwy, more suitable to larger arena and expansion and more promising for building an entertainment district given the amount of empty land surrounded by the warehouse district, Libbey Market and the Highway. Would have built up both downtown and the near South. With that done, who knows? Maybe that would have encouraged the Casino to be more correctly placed in the same area instead of wasting water front on a windowless building.

Being the cynic I am, I'd presume it was land not owned by the right people.

I also seem to recall some county politician taking all the credit. Or maybe that was for Mud Hens stadium. Isenberg? something like that.
(This post was last modified: 04-26-2022 05:50 PM by eastisbest.)
04-26-2022 05:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.