(03-23-2022 01:49 PM)No2rdame Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 10:19 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 10:13 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 09:59 AM)EigenEagle Wrote:  If we ask here what 2+2 is will she say she's not a mathematcian?

Make no mistake... the gender confusion of today is exactly "them" trying to make us say that 2+2=5. Don't compromise. Never use the pretend pronoun.

My pronouns are:

The/she/it

Say it fast.

I usually say she/he/it, and to simplify it I normally combine it, but the auto censor on this site doesn't like that particular word.

(03-23-2022 08:54 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  Any chance Manchin and Simena come through on the correct side of this?

Not Sinema. Not Manchin unless something really bad and new comes out.
Easy on pedophiles isn't bad enough.

(03-23-2022 11:27 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 10:25 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 09:48 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 08:14 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  She’s a dummy. But she’s their kind of dummy.

And you had ACB.

And what was wrong with her?

Nothing. She was a 1000x major upgrade over the dead sack of dust Ginsberg. Old decrepit piece of garbage that she was is rotting in hades now.

Ginsburg was a lot better than Sotomayor or Brown.

KBJ: "With one click, you can distribute tens of thousands [of child porn]. You can be doing this for 15 minutes and all of a sudden, you are looking at 30, 40, 50 years in prison."

Graham: "Good!"


_________________________

this dipshite needs to be stopped.

ketanji

(03-23-2022 07:41 AM)shere khan Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ketanji...word-woman



Does she know the difference between shite and shineola.

A supreme court judge that cant define a woman.

We live in frickin clown world.

Another Sotomayor. Why don't we have a quota on idiots represented. Then we could claim that Sotomayor had already taken that slot. I see little difference between 2 minority reactionaries trained in judicial activism, and both extremely young leaving the ability to pack the court with the same mentality too viable to be tolerated. Democracy implies each one is to be treated severally but equally. Quotas and "diversity" reduces that to identity politics instead of individual beliefs.

I'd say our activist minority slot has already been filled philosophically and any more is disproportionate and therefore not diverse!

(03-23-2022 03:05 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 07:41 AM)shere khan Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ketanji...word-woman



Does she know the difference between shite and shineola.

A supreme court judge that cant define a woman.

We live in frickin clown world.

Another Sotomayor. Why don't we have a quota on idiots represented. Then we could claim that Sotomayor had already taken that slot. I see little difference between 2 minority reactionaries trained in judicial activism, and both extremely young leaving the ability to pack the court with the same mentality too viable to be tolerated. Democracy implies each one is to be treated severally but equally. Quotas and "diversity" reduces that to identity politics instead of individual beliefs.

I'd say our activist minority slot has already been filled philosophically and any more is disproportionate and therefore not diverse!

…….but the Democrats wish there were nine just like these two….. worries me that they’ll try and off Thomas…

(03-23-2022 05:03 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 03:05 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 07:41 AM)shere khan Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ketanji...word-woman



Does she know the difference between shite and shineola.

A supreme court judge that cant define a woman.

We live in frickin clown world.

Another Sotomayor. Why don't we have a quota on idiots represented. Then we could claim that Sotomayor had already taken that slot. I see little difference between 2 minority reactionaries trained in judicial activism, and both extremely young leaving the ability to pack the court with the same mentality too viable to be tolerated. Democracy implies each one is to be treated severally but equally. Quotas and "diversity" reduces that to identity politics instead of individual beliefs.

I'd say our activist minority slot has already been filled philosophically and any more is disproportionate and therefore not diverse!

…….but the Democrats wish there were nine just like these two….. worries me that they’ll try and off Thomas…

If Thomas took the vaccine I sure hope he got the shot from someone he implicitly trusted. The thought I had over his infection sure was in concert with sentiment you expressed.

IMO, we don't have long to turn this crap around!

Mollie
@MZHemingway
·
15h
If you lack both the common sense and the education to understand what being a woman is — or you’re too terrified of your political allies to admit you do know — perhaps you should not have a job that affects other people in any substantial way

Its hard to believe any of this is real but it is.

(03-23-2022 07:41 AM)shere khan Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ketanji...word-woman



Does she know the difference between shite and shineola.

A supreme court judge that cant define a woman.

We live in frickin clown world.

Sorry.
Been off the media and TeeVee all day.

Can you define a Ketanji for me?

I’ve done the spellcheck and the google words and looked around. No definitions it seems.

Help a brother out here. TIA.

(03-23-2022 10:52 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(03-23-2022 07:41 AM)shere khan Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ketanji...word-woman



Does she know the difference between shite and shineola.

A supreme court judge that cant define a woman.

We live in frickin clown world.

Sorry.
Been off the media and TeeVee all day.

Can you define a Ketanji for me?

I’ve done the spellcheck and the google words and looked around. No definitions it seems.

Help a brother out here. TIA.

I would think the answer is somewhere in the 48,000 pages of information that are being withheld from the Senate Committee.

Grassley is right - that IS "a lot of hiding".

The woman is having trouble articulating her position on a variety of issues already. But we do know she is NOT a biologist. Glad we cleared THAT pressing issue up.

DAYAM....

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/202...i-brown-j/

Liberals are the biggest hypocrites on earth. Toxic. It’s a joke and a sham.
This woman is probably very nice and qualified but she’s just so far left it’s insane.

(03-24-2022 07:13 AM)450bench Wrote:  Liberals are the biggest hypocrites on earth. Toxic. It’s a joke and a sham.
This woman is probably very nice and qualified but she’s just so far left it’s insane.

Nice & Qualified / Left & Insane are not qualities found in any coincident subsets. They are wholly skewed.

We have a federal government full of people now at key positions that would instantly turn full totalitarian communist behind a far left whitehouse in an emergency crisis be it war, cyber attack or financial collapse. They would instantly have the backing of the media and corporate conglomerates.

You fill all 3 branches plus the media with radial leftists and then all you need is the right crisis or set of crisis at the right moment.

They will all seize power in an instant. We got a trial run in 2020.

No wonder Putin is going nuts. Our own Supreme Court nominee doesn't even know what a woman is. We're too bogged down in stupid sh!t for him to worry about us.

(03-24-2022 07:40 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  We have a federal government full of people now at key positions that would instantly turn full totalitarian communist behind a far left whitehouse in an emergency crisis be it war, cyber attack or financial collapse. They would instantly have the backing of the media and corporate conglomerates.

You fill all 3 branches plus the media with radial leftists and then all you need is the right crisis or set of crisis at the right moment.

They will all seize power in an instant. We got a trial run in 2020.

And they don't realize no one will be there to protect them when the Piper comes calling.

Perhaps KJB should be asked if she is a woman... Assuming she answers yes, a very simple follow up question should be "How do you know?"

I can only assume her answer will resemble that recent word salad the Kamala-Toes dished out....

Well, How does one know they are a woman
How do I define myself as a woman
How will my womanhood be defined

She will repeat variances of the same question until time expires without saying I HAVE A VAG!NA - THAT IS HOW I KNOW.

The answer to can you define a woman is very simple: A woman can make a baby in her womb and a man can't because he doesn't have one. I have yet to see a man carry a fetus. To make it clear to our dear Liberals, "I mean a real woman with a womb" not one who just claims to be one. One can claim anything they want but that won't make it so no matter how hard one tries. I could claim I'm a physicist but the moment I'm asked a simple physicist question I'll flunk that test.

If democrats could define a woman, they wouldn't turn out so fugly.