RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
I doubt it Stink, the Repubs only talk a big talk but there's no action. They just want to make people think that they will do something but it all dies down and the Demons know it.
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 07:18 PM)olliebaba Wrote: I doubt it Stink, the Repubs only talk a big talk but there's no action. They just want to make people think that they will do something but it all dies down and the Demons know it.
They talk a big talk because it is ALL political theater. They talk big talk, as do the Dems, became it is all political theater
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 07:09 PM)stinkfist Wrote:
(02-12-2022 06:14 PM)JRsec Wrote:
(02-12-2022 06:07 PM)stinkfist Wrote:
(02-12-2022 05:56 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:
how are they going to dodge this bullet?!
w/o hill-lair-liar as their once-scorned cankled frontrunner, I can't offer up another solution going into '24 ... maybe the pubs have finally figured out how to fight back...
Are you sure the lyrics aren't "Is that a Dame?"
well, there is that Chelsea Hubbell thingy while Billy Bob was busy on pedo island ... but, yeahhhhhhh...
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 07:18 PM)olliebaba Wrote: I doubt it Stink, the Repubs only talk a big talk but there's no action. They just want to make people think that they will do something but it all dies down and the Demons know it.
for all our sake and youth, I can only view with optimism on this one ... I don't get 'em all right ... however, muh BA has been well above avg. over time...
note: I did use the disclaimer, "maybe" ...
IMO, the dems knew they had control of most judicial branches/key states/districts/etc.... they also understood how long the process takes to develop a case(s) ... therefore, your fear is real ... mine is (as well) in relative terms...
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
Xcentric is the kind of Communist that would give Benedict Arnold a free ride if he was on his side. I think that's pretty simpletonic in itself. Rules for thee but not for me type of America hater.
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 07:31 PM)olliebaba Wrote: Xcentric is the kind of Communist that would give Benedict Arnold a free ride if he was on his side. I think that's pretty simpletonic in itself. Rules for thee but not for me type of America hater.
I signed that blank check. But please go ahead and tell me how I missed where someone called for the execution of an elected official.
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 07:31 PM)olliebaba Wrote: Xcentric is the kind of Communist that would give Benedict Arnold a free ride if he was on his side. I think that's pretty simpletonic in itself. Rules for thee but not for me type of America hater.
he'd be the underwriter for lifetime annual passes ... losers love losing ... and they're really good at it...
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 07:35 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:
(02-12-2022 07:31 PM)olliebaba Wrote: Xcentric is the kind of Communist that would give Benedict Arnold a free ride if he was on his side. I think that's pretty simpletonic in itself. Rules for thee but not for me type of America hater.
I signed that blank check. But please go ahead and tell me how I missed where someone called for the execution of an elected official.
it is obvious ewe have nuts zongo on ignore ... welcome to the sig line 4 club, half-pint...
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 07:35 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:
(02-12-2022 07:31 PM)olliebaba Wrote: Xcentric is the kind of Communist that would give Benedict Arnold a free ride if he was on his side. I think that's pretty simpletonic in itself. Rules for thee but not for me type of America hater.
I signed that blank check. But please go ahead and tell me how I missed where someone called for the execution of an elected official.
Would you grow some balls and actually comment on the content of this thread? Or stfu and take a hike.
New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
Lets see if so called journalists start to actually investigate this on their own...you know...show some balls, unlike sackless Mr X who does drive by troll shots,
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 08:16 PM)maximus Wrote: Lets see if so called journalists start to actually investigate this on their own...you know...show some balls, unlike sackless Mr X who does drive by troll shots,
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
they're gonna dig into this one ... you don't issue that guy unless there is solid evidence to back it up...
I will say this ... I'll tap into the libtard networks for more shites and giggles than nuts zongo has had in quite some time...
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 07:12 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:
(02-12-2022 06:48 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:
(02-12-2022 06:37 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote: That Bit** needs to be in Jail.
I’d prefer the recipient of a firing squad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Don’t like someone… call for their execution. Simpletons.
The law once called for it for this specific crime. Whether it still calls for it or imprisonment I don't know.
On this board it isn't a violation to ask for the appropriate punishment for a crime. To ask for someone's death when it is not the proscribed punishment for a crime, but rather a random killing without trial and jury and due process is a banning offense and one which is taken seriously. That constitutes a threat or the call for the commission of a crime and will result in immediate banning and possible legal action.
So far proscribed punishment has been suggested. I'll hold it to be as serious of an offense to twist words so as to make them sound like a violation, as a violation itself. You and everyone else consider yourselves informed and warned on this matter.
New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 08:30 PM)JRsec Wrote:
(02-12-2022 07:12 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:
(02-12-2022 06:48 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:
(02-12-2022 06:37 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote: That Bit** needs to be in Jail.
I’d prefer the recipient of a firing squad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Don’t like someone… call for their execution. Simpletons.
The law once called for it for this specific crime. Whether it still calls for it or imprisonment I don't know.
On this board it isn't a violation to ask for the appropriate punishment for a crime. To ask for someone's death when it is not the proscribed punishment for a crime, but rather a random killing without trial and jury and due process is a banning offense and one which is taken seriously. That constitutes a threat or the call for the commission of a crime and will result in immediate banning and possible legal action.
So far proscribed punishment has been suggested. I'll hold it to be as serious of an offense to twist words so as to make them sound like a violation, as a violation itself. You and everyone else consider yourselves informed and warned on this matter.
And this is as serious as I get!
Thank you. I am in no way, shape, or form condoning anything outside of punishment prescribed by the law, and a result of a trial. If that is imprisonment, that’s what it should be.
A U.S. President once said, “We are a nation of laws.” I agree, and all persons should be held accountable for such.
RE: New Durham filing: They spied on Trump while in office
(02-12-2022 08:30 PM)JRsec Wrote:
(02-12-2022 07:12 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:
(02-12-2022 06:48 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:
(02-12-2022 06:37 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote: That Bit** needs to be in Jail.
I’d prefer the recipient of a firing squad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Don’t like someone… call for their execution. Simpletons.
The law once called for it for this specific crime. Whether it still calls for it or imprisonment I don't know.
On this board it isn't a violation to ask for the appropriate punishment for a crime. To ask for someone's death when it is not the proscribed punishment for a crime, but rather a random killing without trial and jury and due process is a banning offense and one which is taken seriously. That constitutes a threat or the call for the commission of a crime and will result in immediate banning and possible legal action.
So far proscribed punishment has been suggested. I'll hold it to be as serious of an offense to twist words so as to make them sound like a violation, as a violation itself. You and everyone else consider yourselves informed and warned on this matter.
And this is as serious as I get!
w/o looking it up, I'm fairly certain it still exists in military law...