Horowitz: Are hospitals making thousands off this dangerous and ineffective COVID drug?

Quote:It simply makes no sense. Hospitals are aggressively using remdesivir months after it has become clear that it is not only ineffective, but causes liver toxicity and kidney failure. Yet despite its astronomical cost, hospital administrators are refusing to pull the treatment from standard protocol. At the same time, they are balking at the use of safe and effective ivermectin (or any other safe repurposed drug) to the point that they are even willing to go to court and appeal if they lose. What gives?

A listener of my podcast who goes by @NC_updipchick on Twitter discovered a little-known fact about the hospital reimbursement scheme for COVID that could possibly explain the genocidal fervor behind doctors blocking lifesaving treatment while sticking with remdesivir until the bitter end. After I had legendary critical care doctor Paul Marik on my podcast to discuss his lawsuit against a Virginia hospital that refused to allow any effective treatments (including vitamin C infusions), @NC_updipchick dug up an important Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services billing rule from over a year ago that seems to explain everything.

I'm a little disappointed that this article didn't go into the whole 'hospital protocol' issue a bit more. The protocol comes from the NIH and the garden gnome and hospitals werre told they must use it. The article goes into the incentives dangled in front of hospitals and people need to understand that aspect.

The protocol being used nationwide is KILLING PEOPLE. Give them remdesivir and then put them on a ventilator. Their lungs fill with fluid once their kidneys shut down and they die, usually within 10 days. This is really evil stuff and those who sanction this should be held accountable.

Quote:Thus, for a hospital system in a given state that treats 5,000 COVID patients over the course of the pandemic, remdesivir alone could be a golden ticket to close to $100 million in federal reimbursements. So while, thanks to the PREP Act, patient families cannot sue Gilead, the maker of remdesivir, for death or organ failure, hospitals are loving every minute of the remdesivir scam.

Perhaps, in a very dark and sinister way, we can now understand the vicious opposition to ivermectin by the hospitals. Ralph Lorigo, the attorney who has litigated most of the ivermectin “right to try” cases against hospital systems, said on my podcast earlier this month that he has gone up against the same hospital attorney in a western New York system who had previously argued against the use of ivermectin and was overruled by the judge, and thanks to that ruling, the patients are now home with their families after being at death’s doorstep. How could that same lawyer possibly argue against him in subsequent cases after seeing the results the first time?

As they say, money makes the world go ’round. Sadly, this greed has likely cost hundreds of thousands of lives.

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-...oggle-gdpr

In addition to this, most hospitals are isolating patients, not letting spouses or family to visit them. They often are cutting off fluids and nutrition before ventilating patients. Doctors won't listen or just shrug off complaints, saying it is protocol and they can not deviate from it.

Here is a strategy that has worked. Tell the Doctor who won't do what the patient or family wants done that you are going to file a malpractice complaint against THEM personally. Their insurance carrier sees those complaints and may raise their insurance premiums. Doctors know this.It may be the one thing that gets them to budge.

Another article on this same topic.

https://aapsonline.org/bidens-bounty-on-...-covid-19/

wait a sec …. whoa the fk whoa, trigger……zzz…………ewe’re now telling muh arse this 2 yrs, too late…

**** TTTHEE CUNTTTS

disclaimer: commentary NOT directed at OP … /sarc sometimes is easily misconstrued…. #sigh