Mark Meadows Lawsuit: Subpoenas Invalid Because Pelosi Constituted Select Committee In Violation of House Authorizing Resolution

Quote:“Speaker Pelosi failed to appoint members consistent with the authorizing resolution of the Select Committee… Thus, the Select Committee as it currently stands—and stood at the time it issued the subpoenas in question—has no authority to conduct business because it is not a duly constituted Select Committee. Chairman Thompson’s subpoenas are invalid and unenforceable.”

(12-15-2021 10:44 PM)BEARCATDALE Wrote:  Mark Meadows Lawsuit: Subpoenas Invalid Because Pelosi Constituted Select Committee In Violation of House Authorizing Resolution

Quote:“Speaker Pelosi failed to appoint members consistent with the authorizing resolution of the Select Committee… Thus, the Select Committee as it currently stands—and stood at the time it issued the subpoenas in question—has no authority to conduct business because it is not a duly constituted Select Committee. Chairman Thompson’s subpoenas are invalid and unenforceable.”

Twist the *****'s ear and make her squeal like a pig.

He’s not wrong, you know.

It doesn’t matter. It’s a sham anyway so it doesn’t matter what they do. Nobodies paying attention but the MSM. And the voters in Montana.

(12-15-2021 11:22 PM)banker Wrote:  He’s not wrong, you know.

i'm no expert, but as i understand it the committee was formed without GOP representation, the members nominated by the GOP were all refused by Nancy who put her own members in. IF that's the case he appears to be right, the committee is invalid and has no authority.

it has to be this way or 2-3 congressmen could call themselves a committee and start hearings and calling and arresting whoever did not show up.

i expect this does not end well for the Dems

womp womp

(12-16-2021 09:17 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(12-15-2021 11:22 PM)banker Wrote:  He’s not wrong, you know.

i'm no expert, but as i understand it the committee was formed without GOP representation, the members nominated by the GOP were all refused by Nancy who put her own members in. IF that's the case he appears to be right, the committee is invalid and has no authority.

it has to be this way or 2-3 congressmen could call themselves a committee and start hearings and calling and arresting whoever did not show up.

i expect this does not end well for the Dems

Assuming you are correct - who the F is advising her on her actions? Is she surrounded by yes people - or even worse - complete morons?

OR

Did she forge ahead like this on purpose knowing the committee did not really have the teeth to enforce jack squat. That gives her plausible deniability so she play dumb and says "Well we are trying to get to the bottom of this, but these rules are getting in my way".

That makes her look like she is doing something, but in the end nothing really gets done - and they can continue with their faux outrage.

That is entirely plausible not only because that is how government works, but also if the committee really opened up all that information it would include A LOT of inconvenient facts the Nancy does not want to be aired in public.

She knows it, she also knows that the MSM will show it and then when nothing happens they can blame the Repubs. You know like Schiffheads Russian collusion narrative. They spew lies knowing that it's not important if it is just lies and goes nowhere but the narrative. How many stupid Liberals are still believing the Russian collusion story? It just shows that whatever the Demons put out idiots will believe it nonetheless and continue it like a religious tenet.

(12-16-2021 09:17 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(12-15-2021 11:22 PM)banker Wrote:  He’s not wrong, you know.

i'm no expert, but as i understand it the committee was formed without GOP representation, the members nominated by the GOP were all refused by Nancy who put her own members in. IF that's the case he appears to be right, the committee is invalid and has no authority.

it has to be this way or 2-3 congressmen could call themselves a committee and start hearings and calling and arresting whoever did not show up.

i expect this does not end well for the Dems

You are correct. I am interested if the courts see it this way.

(12-16-2021 09:17 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(12-15-2021 11:22 PM)banker Wrote:  He’s not wrong, you know.

i'm no expert, but as i understand it the committee was formed without GOP representation, the members nominated by the GOP were all refused by Nancy who put her own members in. IF that's the case he appears to be right, the committee is invalid and has no authority.

it has to be this way or 2-3 congressmen could call themselves a committee and start hearings and calling and arresting whoever did not show up.

i expect this does not end well for the Dems

It's actually somewhat weaker than that. Not only did Fransicko Nan reject the Minority leaders choices and install on there the crybaby and the other soon to be unemployed RINO from Wyoming, this sham is in violation off the original Authorization for the formation of the committee in the first place.

Had to have at least 5 Repubs of the Leaders choice, they have only 2 neither of which are anyone's choice.

(12-16-2021 02:55 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-16-2021 09:17 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(12-15-2021 11:22 PM)banker Wrote:  He’s not wrong, you know.

i'm no expert, but as i understand it the committee was formed without GOP representation, the members nominated by the GOP were all refused by Nancy who put her own members in. IF that's the case he appears to be right, the committee is invalid and has no authority.

it has to be this way or 2-3 congressmen could call themselves a committee and start hearings and calling and arresting whoever did not show up.

i expect this does not end well for the Dems

It's actually somewhat weaker than that. Not only did Fransicko Nan reject the Minority leaders choices and install on there the crybaby and the other soon to be unemployed RINO from Wyoming, this sham is in violation off the original Authorization for the formation of the committee in the first place.

Had to have at least 5 Repubs of the Leaders choice, they have only 2 neither of which are anyone's choice.

which begs the question … why does this committee exist?!

if kittys are gonnA find litter … need I say more?!

what the g’damned fk should anyone expect at this ‘poignant’ … #oopsy

(12-16-2021 02:47 PM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  

(12-16-2021 09:17 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(12-15-2021 11:22 PM)banker Wrote:  He’s not wrong, you know.

i'm no expert, but as i understand it the committee was formed without GOP representation, the members nominated by the GOP were all refused by Nancy who put her own members in. IF that's the case he appears to be right, the committee is invalid and has no authority.

it has to be this way or 2-3 congressmen could call themselves a committee and start hearings and calling and arresting whoever did not show up.

i expect this does not end well for the Dems

You are correct. I am interested if the courts see it this way.

if you were a jurist, would ya touch that TTTwat…

@rhetorical

(12-16-2021 01:10 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(12-16-2021 09:17 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(12-15-2021 11:22 PM)banker Wrote:  He’s not wrong, you know.

i'm no expert, but as i understand it the committee was formed without GOP representation, the members nominated by the GOP were all refused by Nancy who put her own members in. IF that's the case he appears to be right, the committee is invalid and has no authority.

it has to be this way or 2-3 congressmen could call themselves a committee and start hearings and calling and arresting whoever did not show up.

i expect this does not end well for the Dems

Assuming you are correct - who the F is advising her on her actions? Is she surrounded by yes people - or even worse - complete morons?

OR

Did she forge ahead like this on purpose knowing the committee did not really have the teeth to enforce jack squat. That gives her plausible deniability so she play dumb and says "Well we are trying to get to the bottom of this, but these rules are getting in my way".

That makes her look like she is doing something, but in the end nothing really gets done - and they can continue with their faux outrage.

That is entirely plausible not only because that is how government works, but also if the committee really opened up all that information it would include A LOT of inconvenient facts the Nancy does not want to be aired in public.

its simply a tool to harrass anyone who ever even worked with President Trump.

It keeps blowing up in their face.

1. The text messages actually prove Trump was doing the right things

2. The text messages seem to prove Pelosi did not

3. Schiff got busted manipulating evidence.....again

4. THe dem's propaganda network they were counting on to deliver their lies has seen their top anchor removed for sexual harassment and his producer arrested for sex with children.

Its not going the way the dems had hoped.

(12-16-2021 05:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It keeps blowing up in their face.

1. The text messages actually prove Trump was doing the right things

2. The text messages seem to prove Pelosi did not

3. Schiff got busted manipulating evidence.....again

4. THe dem's propaganda network they were counting on to deliver their lies has seen their top anchor removed for sexual harassment and his producer arrested for sex with children.

Its not going the way the dems had hoped.

as the law becomes ‘moire irrelevant’ … tell me again how gepetto isn’t running sieg(e) heil Jesse Owen’s 400 times…

I’m beyond done with lawyers/jurists w/o constitutional spine…

they have no clue what it would be like to ‘unleash’ the real hounds …

#sendOff