bluesox
Heisman
Posts: 5,308
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 84
I Root For:
Location:
|
Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
Invite SMU, Tulane, Memphis, and USF ?
Big 16 with 4 pods
Ok state, Kansas, K state, Iowa State,
Cincy, WVU, USF, UCF
SMU, TCU, Baylor, BYU
Texas Tech, Houston, Tulane, Memphis
That would leave the AAC with 4 and most likely disband ? Thus saving the incoming schools from exit fees. The Big 16 would be set as the best of the rest and be protected from any future losses of schools. It might also allow the sun belt and CUSA to work out a plan
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2021 11:21 AM by bluesox.)
|
|
09-10-2021 10:57 AM |
|
DFW HOYA
Heisman
Posts: 5,457
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 265
I Root For: Georgetown
Location: Dallas, TX
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
No need right now. Others might come to the forefront elsewhere.
That, and the obvious: 16 team leagues tend to collapse of its own weight and fractures within the membership.
|
|
09-10-2021 10:59 AM |
|
Tigersmoke4
All American
Posts: 2,507
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 97
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
(09-10-2021 10:57 AM)bluesox Wrote: Invite SMU, Tulane, Memphis, and USF ?
Big 16 with 4 pods
Ok state, Kansas, K state, Iowa State,
Cincy, WVU, USF, UCF
SMU, TCU, Baylor, BYU
Texas Tech, Houston, Tulane, Memphis
That would leave the AAC with 4 and most likely disband ? The Big 16 would be set as the best of the rest and be protected from any future losses of schools. It might also allow the sun belt and CUSA to work out a plan
YES!!!!!!!
|
|
09-10-2021 11:00 AM |
|
HawaiiMongoose
All American
Posts: 4,743
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 448
I Root For: Hawaii
Location: Honolulu
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
Nah. Regardless of indications the Big 12 “could” further expand, I think they’re done unless they lose more members.
|
|
09-10-2021 11:01 AM |
|
PicksUp
1st String
Posts: 1,914
Joined: Mar 2018
Reputation: 135
I Root For: UTEP, Texas
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
More is less in this scenario.
|
|
09-10-2021 11:05 AM |
|
Nerdlinger
Realignment Enthusiast
Posts: 4,918
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
They already did. That's why they expanded by 4 instead of just 2.
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2021 11:13 AM by Nerdlinger.)
|
|
09-10-2021 11:12 AM |
|
Troy_Fan_15
Sun Belt Apologist
Posts: 4,904
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 286
I Root For: Troy Trojans
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
I think UC, UCF, and UH were the kill shot. They could snag Memphis and USF I guess if they really wanted to bury the AAC for good. The rest of the members probably disperse out.
|
|
09-10-2021 11:13 AM |
|
gulfcoastgal
All American
Posts: 4,299
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 400
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
I’ve seen more media mentioning 14 vs. 16. At any rate, I don’t think any more adds are made until UT/OU exit terms get ironed out. Though a couple could be announced before then.
|
|
09-10-2021 11:14 AM |
|
b0ndsj0ns
Legend
Posts: 27,122
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1028
I Root For: ECU
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
(09-10-2021 10:57 AM)bluesox Wrote: Invite SMU, Tulane, Memphis, and USF ?
Big 16 with 4 pods
Ok state, Kansas, K state, Iowa State,
Cincy, WVU, USF, UCF
SMU, TCU, Baylor, BYU
Texas Tech, Houston, Tulane, Memphis
That would leave the AAC with 4 and most likely disband ? Thus saving the incoming schools from exit fees. The Big 16 would be set as the best of the rest and be protected from any future losses of schools. It might also allow the sun belt and CUSA to work out a plan
Even in this never happening scenario the AAC still wouldn't disband. The 3 teams that just announced they are leaving no longer have voting rights. The AAC schools left in this scenario have no home to go to that would even be worth as much as the buyout fees they'd be getting. You'd probably be talking about close to 100 million in exit fees all told from all those schools leaving. Same as the Big East did a decade ago they'd cash those checks, add schools, and live but obviously not be any good anymore.
|
|
09-10-2021 11:26 AM |
|
mlb
O' Great One
Posts: 20,326
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 542
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
(09-10-2021 11:26 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote: (09-10-2021 10:57 AM)bluesox Wrote: Invite SMU, Tulane, Memphis, and USF ?
Big 16 with 4 pods
Ok state, Kansas, K state, Iowa State,
Cincy, WVU, USF, UCF
SMU, TCU, Baylor, BYU
Texas Tech, Houston, Tulane, Memphis
That would leave the AAC with 4 and most likely disband ? Thus saving the incoming schools from exit fees. The Big 16 would be set as the best of the rest and be protected from any future losses of schools. It might also allow the sun belt and CUSA to work out a plan
Even in this never happening scenario the AAC still wouldn't disband. The 3 teams that just announced they are leaving no longer have voting rights. The AAC schools left in this scenario have no home to go to that would even be worth as much as the buyout fees they'd be getting. You'd probably be talking about close to 100 million in exit fees all told from all those schools leaving. Same as the Big East did a decade ago they'd cash those checks, add schools, and live but obviously not be any good anymore.
I think the precedent has been set... $17m a piece for the quicker exit. So half of your estimation.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
|
|
09-10-2021 11:30 AM |
|
SouthEastAlaska
1st String
Posts: 2,193
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 308
I Root For: UW
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
The AAC is already on life support so to speak, with the losses of UCF, Cincinnati, and Houston. If the rumors are true that the BigXII will add two more schools when UT/OU leave and those schools are Memphis and USF, then that's your kill shot. IMO there is no reason to do it now though, those schools will still be available in 2 years when the spots open up.
|
|
09-10-2021 11:36 AM |
|
b0ndsj0ns
Legend
Posts: 27,122
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1028
I Root For: ECU
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
(09-10-2021 11:30 AM)mlb Wrote: (09-10-2021 11:26 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote: (09-10-2021 10:57 AM)bluesox Wrote: Invite SMU, Tulane, Memphis, and USF ?
Big 16 with 4 pods
Ok state, Kansas, K state, Iowa State,
Cincy, WVU, USF, UCF
SMU, TCU, Baylor, BYU
Texas Tech, Houston, Tulane, Memphis
That would leave the AAC with 4 and most likely disband ? Thus saving the incoming schools from exit fees. The Big 16 would be set as the best of the rest and be protected from any future losses of schools. It might also allow the sun belt and CUSA to work out a plan
Even in this never happening scenario the AAC still wouldn't disband. The 3 teams that just announced they are leaving no longer have voting rights. The AAC schools left in this scenario have no home to go to that would even be worth as much as the buyout fees they'd be getting. You'd probably be talking about close to 100 million in exit fees all told from all those schools leaving. Same as the Big East did a decade ago they'd cash those checks, add schools, and live but obviously not be any good anymore.
I think the precedent has been set... $17m a piece for the quicker exit. So half of your estimation.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
I was saying in this weird scenario where 7 teams left the AAC. That would be over 100 million in exit fees. You are correct though I suspect the final number the AAC gets from the 3 leaving will be around 50 million or so.
|
|
09-10-2021 12:03 PM |
|
RUScarlets
Heisman
Posts: 7,215
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 176
I Root For: Rutgers
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
I think you go for it. But I'd look at 15 only:
SouthWest: SMU, TCU, TTech, Houston, Baylor
Big 5: BYU, OSU, KSU, KU, ISU
East: WVU, UC, Memphis, UCF, USF
With Home and Home partners:
1. WVU/UC, UCF/USF
2. OSU/ISU, KSU/KU
3. TTech/TCU, Baylor/Houston
SMU, Memphis, BYU (plays annual round robin). 5+1+1 conference schedule.
Top 3 division winners and 1 WC playoff in scheduled in either of the two weeks prior to CCG weekend.
This gives you 7 guaranteed conference games. 5 OOC games can be scheduled. Completely unique P5 setup as well.
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2021 12:14 PM by RUScarlets.)
|
|
09-10-2021 12:11 PM |
|
Nerdlinger
Realignment Enthusiast
Posts: 4,918
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
(09-10-2021 10:57 AM)bluesox Wrote: Invite SMU, Tulane, Memphis, and USF ?
Big 16 with 4 pods
Ok state, Kansas, K state, Iowa State,
Cincy, WVU, USF, UCF
SMU, TCU, Baylor, BYU
Texas Tech, Houston, Tulane, Memphis
That would leave the AAC with 4 and most likely disband ? Thus saving the incoming schools from exit fees. The Big 16 would be set as the best of the rest and be protected from any future losses of schools. It might also allow the sun belt and CUSA to work out a plan
Definitely don't need Tulane, and TCU would still likely veto SMU. So if they're foolishly expanding to 16 as a non-power conference, they'd add Boise and, I'd guess, Navy as a FB-only.
East: Central Florida, Cincinnati, South Florida, West Virginia
North: Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma State
South: Houston, Memphis, Navy*, TCU
West: Baylor, Boise State, BYU, Texas Tech
Would be smart to add Wichita State to balance out Navy, but with 2 Kansas schools already in the conference, not gonna happen.
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2021 12:20 PM by Nerdlinger.)
|
|
09-10-2021 12:17 PM |
|
BCSvsBS
Special Teams
Posts: 711
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation: 84
I Root For: USF
Location: In a moment in time.
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
(09-10-2021 10:57 AM)bluesox Wrote: Invite SMU, Tulane, Memphis, and USF ?
Big 16 with 4 pods
Ok state, Kansas, K state, Iowa State,
Cincy, WVU, USF, UCF
SMU, TCU, Baylor, BYU
Texas Tech, Houston, Tulane, Memphis
That would leave the AAC with 4 and most likely disband ? Thus saving the incoming schools from exit fees. The Big 16 would be set as the best of the rest and be protected from any future losses of schools. It might also allow the sun belt and CUSA to work out a plan
YES, please. Just Do It!!!
|
|
09-10-2021 01:04 PM |
|
CoastalJuan
Business Drunk
Posts: 6,938
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 522
I Root For: ECU
Location: Right near da beeach
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
(09-10-2021 11:36 AM)SouthEastAlaska Wrote: The AAC is already on life support so to speak, with the losses of UCF, Cincinnati, and Houston. If the rumors are true that the BigXII will add two more schools when UT/OU leave and those schools are Memphis and USF, then that's your kill shot. IMO there is no reason to do it now though, those schools will still be available in 2 years when the spots open up.
Meh. The Big East/AAC had three "original" football teams left when the dust settled. Finding quality backfill is the key.
|
|
09-10-2021 01:21 PM |
|
Big Frog II
1st String
Posts: 2,021
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 116
I Root For: TCU
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
No
|
|
09-10-2021 01:23 PM |
|
thrill_house
Bench Warmer
Posts: 187
Joined: Apr 2021
Reputation: 13
I Root For: Anti-CFP
Location:
|
RE: Should the big 12 go for the AAC kill shot
If the best college football program that got left out of the Power 5 is Memphis (Boise was never joining), then nobody got left out.
|
|
09-10-2021 01:31 PM |
|