https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1...7037754368

FAULT LINE

Uhhhh... if they're vaccinated, then why do they need to be protected?????

(09-09-2021 07:17 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Uhhhh... if they're vaccinated, then why do they need to be protected?????

Haven’t you heard? The CDC changed the definition of vaccine a few days ago.

(09-09-2021 07:17 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Uhhhh... if they're vaccinated, then why do they need to be protected?????

Yep, if when Trump was telling us to do so they said no and because The SOB is in the office it's now "the thing to do?" Those idiots in The SOBs administration are capitulating to Trump by making Trumps idea "MANDATORY!"

(09-09-2021 06:27 PM)green Wrote:  

https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1...7037754368

FAULT LINE

I knew this President was dense but I didn’t know how dense until this statement. Yes, we must save the vaccinated. If the covid shot isn’t enough Pendejo then what will save them? Oh yeah the fact that whether you get the shot or not you still have 99% recovery. Lord, help this fool find the door out of Government and into an old folks home where he belongs.

Since the vaccinated can still get and spread the virus, what is going to protect them from each other?

I'm sorry, bit shouldn't the vaccine protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated?

Love to hear Doocy ask circle back that one, or better yet, Quid pro Joe.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

(09-09-2021 06:27 PM)green Wrote:  

https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1...7037754368

FAULT LINE

That statement is absurd scientifically. Although it greatly reduces your risk of serious complications... The vaccine does not stop you from getting Covid or transmitting it.

Quote:Although it greatly reduces your risk of serious complications

Why do people keep saying this? You have no idea if this is true. Show your data. "CNN/CDC said so" means nothing. They've lied and lied and lied. How can you believe them?

Case in point.

COVID-NET Data Collection, Timeliness and Interpretation

From cdc.gov

Quote:Cases are identified in COVID-NET if they test positive for SARS-COV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 disease) through a test ordered by a health care professional and are hospitalized within 14 days of the positive test.

In other words, if you tested positive for covid within 14 days of hospitalization, you are counted as in the hospital for covid regardless of why you're there. Car wreck and you had a covid positive test, you're a covid patient. Heart attack, fell off the roof, shot in the belly? Same thing. Again, this is from the cdc site.

People need to wake up.

And by the way, this is exactly how they're over inflating the number of children hospitalized "from covid".

(09-10-2021 07:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

Quote:Although it greatly reduces your risk of serious complications

Why do people keep saying this? You have no idea if this is true. Show your data. "CNN/CDC said so" means nothing. They've lied and lied and lied. How can you believe them?

Case in point.

COVID-NET Data Collection, Timeliness and Interpretation

From cdc.gov

Quote:Cases are identified in COVID-NET if they test positive for SARS-COV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 disease) through a test ordered by a health care professional and are hospitalized within 14 days of the positive test.

In other words, if you tested positive for covid within 14 days of hospitalization, you are counted as in the hospital for covid regardless of why you're there. Car wreck and you had a covid positive test, you're a covid patient. Heart attack, fell off the roof, shot in the belly? Same thing. Again, this is from the cdc site.

People need to wake up.

From Jan. 1 to Aug. 30... 99% of hospitalizations were from those not fully inoculated. As of Aug. 30...1.6 million Americans were hospitalized with C19. 10,471 were fully inoculated. Thats .65% of the total. It does not take a degree in statistics to see that the vaccine clearly improves one's chances of serious complications from C19.

Prove. Those. Numbers.

We both know you can't.

(09-10-2021 08:02 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 07:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

Quote:Although it greatly reduces your risk of serious complications

Why do people keep saying this? You have no idea if this is true. Show your data. "CNN/CDC said so" means nothing. They've lied and lied and lied. How can you believe them?

Case in point.

COVID-NET Data Collection, Timeliness and Interpretation

From cdc.gov

Quote:Cases are identified in COVID-NET if they test positive for SARS-COV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 disease) through a test ordered by a health care professional and are hospitalized within 14 days of the positive test.

In other words, if you tested positive for covid within 14 days of hospitalization, you are counted as in the hospital for covid regardless of why you're there. Car wreck and you had a covid positive test, you're a covid patient. Heart attack, fell off the roof, shot in the belly? Same thing. Again, this is from the cdc site.

People need to wake up.

From Jan. 1 to Aug. 30... 99% of hospitalizations were from those not fully inoculated. As of Aug. 30...1.6 million Americans were hospitalized with C19. 10,471 were fully inoculated. Thats .65% of the total. It does not take a degree in statistics to see that the vaccine clearly improves one's chances of serious complications from C19.

It does not take a degree in statistics to know that using data from the beginning of the year when practically nobody was vaccinated is statistical subterfuge.

(09-10-2021 08:02 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 07:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

Quote:Although it greatly reduces your risk of serious complications

Why do people keep saying this? You have no idea if this is true. Show your data. "CNN/CDC said so" means nothing. They've lied and lied and lied. How can you believe them?

Case in point.

COVID-NET Data Collection, Timeliness and Interpretation

From cdc.gov

Quote:Cases are identified in COVID-NET if they test positive for SARS-COV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 disease) through a test ordered by a health care professional and are hospitalized within 14 days of the positive test.

In other words, if you tested positive for covid within 14 days of hospitalization, you are counted as in the hospital for covid regardless of why you're there. Car wreck and you had a covid positive test, you're a covid patient. Heart attack, fell off the roof, shot in the belly? Same thing. Again, this is from the cdc site.

People need to wake up.

From Jan. 1 to Aug. 30... 99% of hospitalizations were from those not fully inoculated. As of Aug. 30...1.6 million Americans were hospitalized with C19. 10,471 were fully inoculated. Thats .65% of the total. It does not take a degree in statistics to see that the vaccine clearly improves one's chances of serious complications from C19.

I now know 4 people who have caught covid since the jabs started. The two un’vaccinated’ were given a vitamin pack and sent home. Nothing else. No antiviral or anything requiring a prescription. They both had a bad case of flu like symptoms and took over a week to get better.

Now, and this is absolutely true, the two who had been ‘vaccinated’ were called back to the doctor after the test came back positive and were sent to a neighboring county to get ‘the transfusion’. Neither of them can remember what the name of the treatment was but both were better the next day. Why? I don’t have an answer but the question is a big one.

What l learned from this is that if I get sick with this crap I will look my doctor in the eye and tell him “if I die from this because he gave me nothing but vitamins my family will sue the ever living chit out of him”. I also learned this disease has been politicized in its treatment. It would seem the ‘vaccinated’ are getting preferential treatment for some reason only the doctors and government know. ($$$)

I don't have a degree in statistics, but I did take a class in it in college. I learned enough to know you can use statistics to prove either side of most any argument.

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

This should never ever have been political. The second the Democrats had something to pin on Trump, they used it and made it political. Now this same tactic is being used on Biden and they don't like it.


Live by the sword die by the sword....
Do unto others.....
Pot / Kettle.....
Play stupid games....

(09-10-2021 08:02 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 07:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

Quote:Although it greatly reduces your risk of serious complications

Why do people keep saying this? You have no idea if this is true. Show your data. "CNN/CDC said so" means nothing. They've lied and lied and lied. How can you believe them?

Case in point.

COVID-NET Data Collection, Timeliness and Interpretation

From cdc.gov

Quote:Cases are identified in COVID-NET if they test positive for SARS-COV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 disease) through a test ordered by a health care professional and are hospitalized within 14 days of the positive test.

In other words, if you tested positive for covid within 14 days of hospitalization, you are counted as in the hospital for covid regardless of why you're there. Car wreck and you had a covid positive test, you're a covid patient. Heart attack, fell off the roof, shot in the belly? Same thing. Again, this is from the cdc site.

People need to wake up.

From Jan. 1 to Aug. 30... 99% of hospitalizations were from those not fully inoculated. As of Aug. 30...1.6 million Americans were hospitalized with C19. 10,471 were fully inoculated. Thats .65% of the total. It does not take a degree in statistics to see that the vaccine clearly improves one's chances of serious complications from C19.

Only the data from June 1 to Sept 1 is relevant due to the availability of the vaccines. I would wager that changes the data significantly, though in all likelihood the unvaccinated ate still the majority of the hospitalized.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2021 08:34 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Only the data from June 1 to Sept 1 is relevant due to the availability of the vaccines. I would wager that changes the data significantly, though in all likelihood the unvaccinated ate still the majority of the hospitalized.

And if true, this then begs the question, if the vaccinated are at little risk from the virus, why must they be protected from the unvaccinated?

(09-10-2021 08:34 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  This should never ever have been political. The second the Democrats had something to pin on Trump, they used it and made it political. Now this same tactic is being used on Biden and they don't like it.


Live by the sword die by the sword....
Do unto others.....
Pot / Kettle.....
Play stupid games....

That's what I was telling my wife the other night when a supercut of dems saying they wouldn't take the trump vaccine came up on tiktok. They turned this into a political football to rally their electorate for Nov 2020 and now they have to deal with the consequences.

I don’t usually share TikTok videos but this one gets to the point, indirectly of course.

https://www.tiktok.com/@forever.brit/vid...enger&_r=1