RE: TX Anti Abortion Law Is In Place - Toobin the zoom masturbator is upsetz
(09-05-2021 04:45 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:
(09-05-2021 04:27 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:
(09-02-2021 07:53 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:
(09-02-2021 04:56 PM)umbluegray Wrote:
(09-02-2021 11:13 AM)maximus Wrote: Yeah I dont look at it that way at all.
Just imagine how many of these unwanted babies could have turned out to be great assets to human kind.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Exactly. Since 1973, how many of the 62 MILLION people (62,000,000) could have found a cure for cancer; discovered new technology; created great music, literature and art? Heck, how many of them might have been able to be president instead of Biden*!
Why punish society with the infirmed, the elderly, the destitute?
Or the flip side of that logic…
How many of those could have murdered your family, raped your wife, killed your best friend in a robbery, gunned down your mother and father, or sexually molested your kids.
What if’s aren’t all rainbows and sunshine and unfortunately the chances of those unwanted kids doing all or some what I said above are higher than being the second coming of Jesus or Albert Einstein.
What a mental midget. You must think yourself a God. A look into my crystal ball and I see all aborted babies would have turned out bad. Clueless. How fortunate you are that you weren’t aborted. May God have mercy on us for allowing the destruction of his creation.
In the Old Testament there are accounts of the Israelites sacrificing their babies to false gods. I used to think how terrible that was and how could they get to such a place mentally to allow this. Then, I realized we as a country do this on a grand scale. And, we don’t even wait on them to be born.
Mother Theresa said it best.
“We must not be surprised when we hear of murders, of killings, of wars, of hatred. If a mother can kill her own child, what is left but for us to kill each other?” and, “A nation that kills its children in the womb has lost its soul.”
We, the United States have lost our way and I personally am just waiting for the division to come next.
Your reading comprehension skills are very poor.
Whether or not you want to suppose, make an counter argument, or play devil’s advocate makes no difference to me. What does is the fact you thought enough about it to put in print for others to read. Quite repulsive for someone who pretends to be holier than thou. Ain’t that right Mr. Politically Correct? Judgement is always harshest for those who judge.
RE: TX Anti Abortion Law Is In Place - Toobin the zoom masturbator is upsetz
(09-05-2021 07:18 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:
Hope they have a lot of electric cars don't drink Tito's in their Martinis. I wonder how many local businesses that trade with Texas vendors they just put out of business? Must not be many steakhouses in Portland.
RE: TX Anti Abortion Law Is In Place - Toobin the zoom masturbator is upsetz
(09-05-2021 07:46 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:
(09-05-2021 07:18 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:
Hope they have a lot of electric cars don't drink Tito's in their Martinis. I wonder how many local businesses that trade with Texas vendors they just put out of business? Must not be many steakhouses in Portland.
Somehow I really don't think anyone is should be concerned about losing their business.
Quote:Joe Biden’s Department of Justice is pledging to get involved after the U.S. Supreme Court decided not to block an abortion law that passed in Texas.
Last week, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 not to block a Texas state law that prohibits abortion after six weeks.
Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement that his agency will “protect those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services” under a federal law referred to as the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act.
“The department will provide support from federal law enforcement when an abortion clinic or reproductive health center is under attack,” he added. “We will not tolerate violence against those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services, physical obstruction or property damage in violation of the FACE Act.”
Garland said the DOJ will try to fight back against the Texas law, saying his agency will “protect the constitutional rights of women and other persons, including access to an abortion.”
Garland told CNN on Sunday:
We have the best lawyers at the Justice Department looking for legal remedies to protect women who are seeking to exercise their constitutional rights. We have the team at HHS looking at what means we can do to try to get women the healthcare services they need in the face of this Texas law, and we have the gender policy counsel here at the White House, the first time a president’s ever had a policy counsel devoted to gender issues coordinating all this work to bring options forward for the president and the vice president.
RE: TX Anti Abortion Law Is In Place - Toobin the zoom masturbator is upsetz
(09-06-2021 05:02 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:
A growing number of Churches are pro abortion? Is this an oxymoron? No house of God would ever support the destruction of his creation. This just in Satan goes to church as well. Who would have thought?
Quote:The Department of Justice filed an emergency motion Tuesday demanding that a federal judge issue an order halting Texas’ “heartbeat” law, which effectively outlaws abortion after fetal cardiac activity can be detected, around six weeks of pregnancy.
The DOJ has already filed suit against the law in Texas court. Ahead of the law going into effect at the beginning of September, several other potential plaintiffs filed for an emergency stay against the law, but both a lower federal court and the Supreme Court refused to stop the Texas law, with both suggesting that the plaintiffs requesting the stay had yet to suffer particular harm, giving them standing to bring suit.
Attorney General Merrick Garland responded to the Supreme Court’s decision not to act by demanding that the United States government get involved, and vowing to “protect those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services.” The Biden administration, Garland pledged, would “not tolerate violence against those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services.”
“The department will provide support from federal law enforcement when an abortion clinic or reproductive health center is under attack. We have reached out to U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and FBI field offices in Texas and across the country to discuss our enforcement authorities,” Garland said in a statement.
Shortly thereafter, the DOJ filed suit against the law, claiming that Texas “enacted S.B. 8 [the heartbeat law] in open defiance of the Constitution,” that Texas “adopted an unprecedented scheme ‘to insulate the State from responsibility,'” by empowering its citizens to bring suit against abortion providers.
“It takes little imagination to discern Texas’s goal — to make it too risky for an abortion clinic to operate in the State, thereby preventing women throughout Texas from exercising their constitutional rights, while simultaneously thwarting judicial review,” the DOJ argued in its initial brief. “The United States, therefore, seeks a declaratory judgment that S.B. 8 is invalid.”
The first filing argued for a preliminary injunction against the state of Texas, “including its officers, employees, and agents,” and “including private parties who would bring suit under the law, from implementing or enforcing S.B. 8.”
The emergency injunction, filed Tuesday, claimed that “a State may not prohibit any woman from making the ultimate decision to terminate her pregnancy before viability,” and again claimed that Texas implemented “an unprecedented scheme that seeks to deny women and providers the ability to challenge S.B. 8 in federal court. This attempt to shield a plainly unconstitutional law from review cannot stand.”
“This relief is necessary to protect the constitutional rights of women in Texas and the sovereign interest of the United States,” the brief claims.
In one Texas county, a judge sided with abortion providers and has already stayed the law, issuing a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Texas Right to Life on behalf of Planned Parenthood, after Planned Parenthood argued that “the law has drastically harmed them already and will do more harm if it is not enjoined” and that “Texas Right to Life and those involved in the organization have already announced their plans to bring litigation against them, prompting the clinics to prempetively petition for injunctive relief against such suits.”
Quote:The Department of Justice filed an emergency motion Tuesday demanding that a federal judge issue an order halting Texas’ “heartbeat” law, which effectively outlaws abortion after fetal cardiac activity can be detected, around six weeks of pregnancy.
The DOJ has already filed suit against the law in Texas court. Ahead of the law going into effect at the beginning of September, several other potential plaintiffs filed for an emergency stay against the law, but both a lower federal court and the Supreme Court refused to stop the Texas law, with both suggesting that the plaintiffs requesting the stay had yet to suffer particular harm, giving them standing to bring suit.
Attorney General Merrick Garland responded to the Supreme Court’s decision not to act by demanding that the United States government get involved, and vowing to “protect those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services.” The Biden administration, Garland pledged, would “not tolerate violence against those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services.”
“The department will provide support from federal law enforcement when an abortion clinic or reproductive health center is under attack. We have reached out to U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and FBI field offices in Texas and across the country to discuss our enforcement authorities,” Garland said in a statement.
Shortly thereafter, the DOJ filed suit against the law, claiming that Texas “enacted S.B. 8 [the heartbeat law] in open defiance of the Constitution,” that Texas “adopted an unprecedented scheme ‘to insulate the State from responsibility,'” by empowering its citizens to bring suit against abortion providers.
“It takes little imagination to discern Texas’s goal — to make it too risky for an abortion clinic to operate in the State, thereby preventing women throughout Texas from exercising their constitutional rights, while simultaneously thwarting judicial review,” the DOJ argued in its initial brief. “The United States, therefore, seeks a declaratory judgment that S.B. 8 is invalid.”
The first filing argued for a preliminary injunction against the state of Texas, “including its officers, employees, and agents,” and “including private parties who would bring suit under the law, from implementing or enforcing S.B. 8.”
The emergency injunction, filed Tuesday, claimed that “a State may not prohibit any woman from making the ultimate decision to terminate her pregnancy before viability,” and again claimed that Texas implemented “an unprecedented scheme that seeks to deny women and providers the ability to challenge S.B. 8 in federal court. This attempt to shield a plainly unconstitutional law from review cannot stand.”
“This relief is necessary to protect the constitutional rights of women in Texas and the sovereign interest of the United States,” the brief claims.
In one Texas county, a judge sided with abortion providers and has already stayed the law, issuing a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Texas Right to Life on behalf of Planned Parenthood, after Planned Parenthood argued that “the law has drastically harmed them already and will do more harm if it is not enjoined” and that “Texas Right to Life and those involved in the organization have already announced their plans to bring litigation against them, prompting the clinics to prempetively petition for injunctive relief against such suits.”
/
[NEWS] TX Anti Abortion Law Is In Place - Toobin the zoom masturbator is upsetz
