(08-20-2021 09:54 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:44 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  Pointing out the even more obvious, but it’s an extremely slippery slope to make assumptions about people you know nothing about.

Well on that note, you've definitely convinced me that you contain multitudes, and are not a very obvious person with obvious demographics, personality traits, and convictions, which have been obviously conveyed on this board for years.

Yes my 1000s of posts overwhelming about sports in threads about sports on a sports forum really paint me with such a broad brush unlike your 1000 or so posts seemingly always finding the topics outside of sports, despite these forums being here to primarily discuss sports.

PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

(08-20-2021 09:47 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:25 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:58 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:43 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  Sure "oppressed" is a little dramatized there, but the other title of "target" certainty works, and you selectively choose which one you wanted to use here. I'm not sure why you felt the need to post other than to make it clear that you have fully dug your heels in on the wider topic. I mean you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of instances of fat shaming and that there are certainty times out of shape are treated different than able-bodied/fit and trim. All in all, just a very weird hill to die on.

Quote:Among the privileged, according to the presentation, are people who identify as male, cisgender, heterosexual, heteroromantic, Christian, White, Western European, American, upper to middle class, thin/athletic build, able-bodied, or ages 30s to early 50s.

Among the oppressed groups, according to the presentation, are people who identify as Black, Asian, Latinx, non-Western European, LGBTQ+, homoromantic, Muslim, Jewish, working class, overweight, or disabled, among others.

Clearly I’m just following their wording.

Who is "their"?

you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of the link in this thread identifying who crafted this. All in all, just a very weird question to ask.

So you are aware that it was Fox News wording right? It isn't JMU's. According to the JMU training linked by the article in the link you are pointing to, overweight (or as we have called it "out of shape") isn't an oppressed group. Apologize if I'm the bearer of bad news but it seems like your entire sh!tty point was based on Faux News.

(08-20-2021 08:58 AM)Purplehazed Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:43 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:17 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:11 AM)AllForDukes Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 07:56 AM)Bill Wrote:  male, heterosexual, Christian, white, Western European, American, upper to middle class, able-bodied, ages 30-50 sounds like the demographic of the typical JMU alumni/parent/donor.

Recent alumni only. You left out the fit and trim part.

So you can start out an oppressed out of shape person and through hard work in the gym turn yourself into a person of privilege? OK…

Sure "oppressed" is a little dramatized there, but the other title of "target" certainty works, and you selectively choose which one you wanted to use here. I'm not sure why you felt the need to post other than to make it clear that you have fully dug your heels in on the wider topic. I mean you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of instances of fat shaming and that there are certainty times out of shape are treated different than able-bodied/fit and trim. All in all, just a very weird hill to die on.

This one is tricky... White, make, educated, successful, heterosexual, no crime record, less than 60 years old, debt free due to good decision making...

...and bald shamed. Who is protecting from oppression the bald people?

This is the "new dawn"...no one is bald anymore. You are follically challenged.

(08-20-2021 10:01 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

I sure don't know anything about a̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶s̶t̶e̶r̶e̶o̶t̶y̶p̶e̶ Polish Hammer.

(08-20-2021 10:10 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:47 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:25 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:58 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:43 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  Sure "oppressed" is a little dramatized there, but the other title of "target" certainty works, and you selectively choose which one you wanted to use here. I'm not sure why you felt the need to post other than to make it clear that you have fully dug your heels in on the wider topic. I mean you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of instances of fat shaming and that there are certainty times out of shape are treated different than able-bodied/fit and trim. All in all, just a very weird hill to die on.

Quote:Among the privileged, according to the presentation, are people who identify as male, cisgender, heterosexual, heteroromantic, Christian, White, Western European, American, upper to middle class, thin/athletic build, able-bodied, or ages 30s to early 50s.

Among the oppressed groups, according to the presentation, are people who identify as Black, Asian, Latinx, non-Western European, LGBTQ+, homoromantic, Muslim, Jewish, working class, overweight, or disabled, among others.

Clearly I’m just following their wording.

Who is "their"?

you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of the link in this thread identifying who crafted this. All in all, just a very weird question to ask.

So you are aware that it was Fox News wording right? It isn't JMU's. According to the JMU training linked by the article in the link you are pointing to, overweight (or as we have called it "out of shape") isn't an oppressed group. Apologize if I'm the bearer of bad news but it seems like your entire sh!tty point was based on Faux News.

From the presentation.

Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk

(08-20-2021 10:10 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:47 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:25 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:58 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:43 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  Sure "oppressed" is a little dramatized there, but the other title of "target" certainty works, and you selectively choose which one you wanted to use here. I'm not sure why you felt the need to post other than to make it clear that you have fully dug your heels in on the wider topic. I mean you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of instances of fat shaming and that there are certainty times out of shape are treated different than able-bodied/fit and trim. All in all, just a very weird hill to die on.

Quote:Among the privileged, according to the presentation, are people who identify as male, cisgender, heterosexual, heteroromantic, Christian, White, Western European, American, upper to middle class, thin/athletic build, able-bodied, or ages 30s to early 50s.

Among the oppressed groups, according to the presentation, are people who identify as Black, Asian, Latinx, non-Western European, LGBTQ+, homoromantic, Muslim, Jewish, working class, overweight, or disabled, among others.

Clearly I’m just following their wording.

Who is "their"?

you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of the link in this thread identifying who crafted this. All in all, just a very weird question to ask.

So you are aware that it was Fox News wording right? It isn't JMU's. According to the JMU training linked by the article in the link you are pointing to, overweight (or as we have called it "out of shape") isn't an oppressed group. Apologize if I'm the bearer of bad news but it seems like your entire sh!tty point was based on Faux News.

Really quite a stretch to split hairs on the naming of one group of 23+ taken from the JMU training materials. It was a response to a lighthearted comment about being fit and trim, which was in one grouping with overweight being in the other. But thanks for the shiity follow-up.

(08-20-2021 10:10 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:47 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:25 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:58 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:43 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  Sure "oppressed" is a little dramatized there, but the other title of "target" certainty works, and you selectively choose which one you wanted to use here. I'm not sure why you felt the need to post other than to make it clear that you have fully dug your heels in on the wider topic. I mean you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of instances of fat shaming and that there are certainty times out of shape are treated different than able-bodied/fit and trim. All in all, just a very weird hill to die on.

Quote:Among the privileged, according to the presentation, are people who identify as male, cisgender, heterosexual, heteroromantic, Christian, White, Western European, American, upper to middle class, thin/athletic build, able-bodied, or ages 30s to early 50s.

Among the oppressed groups, according to the presentation, are people who identify as Black, Asian, Latinx, non-Western European, LGBTQ+, homoromantic, Muslim, Jewish, working class, overweight, or disabled, among others.

Clearly I’m just following their wording.

Who is "their"?

you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of the link in this thread identifying who crafted this. All in all, just a very weird question to ask.

So you are aware that it was Fox News wording right? It isn't JMU's. According to the JMU training linked by the article in the link you are pointing to, overweight (or as we have called it "out of shape") isn't an oppressed group. Apologize if I'm the bearer of bad news but it seems like your entire sh!tty point was based on Faux News.

You may want to watch the video. Not really trying to get myself into this turd storm, but they clearly do classify overweight and underweight as "oppressed"

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:01 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

I sure don't know anything about a̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶s̶t̶e̶r̶e̶o̶t̶y̶p̶e̶ Polish Hammer.

Is that a Polack joke?

(08-20-2021 10:10 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:47 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 09:25 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:58 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 08:43 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  Sure "oppressed" is a little dramatized there, but the other title of "target" certainty works, and you selectively choose which one you wanted to use here. I'm not sure why you felt the need to post other than to make it clear that you have fully dug your heels in on the wider topic. I mean you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of instances of fat shaming and that there are certainty times out of shape are treated different than able-bodied/fit and trim. All in all, just a very weird hill to die on.

Quote:Among the privileged, according to the presentation, are people who identify as male, cisgender, heterosexual, heteroromantic, Christian, White, Western European, American, upper to middle class, thin/athletic build, able-bodied, or ages 30s to early 50s.

Among the oppressed groups, according to the presentation, are people who identify as Black, Asian, Latinx, non-Western European, LGBTQ+, homoromantic, Muslim, Jewish, working class, overweight, or disabled, among others.

Clearly I’m just following their wording.

Who is "their"?

you clearly know how to use the internet so you are clearly aware of the link in this thread identifying who crafted this. All in all, just a very weird question to ask.

So you are aware that it was Fox News wording right? It isn't JMU's. According to the JMU training linked by the article in the link you are pointing to, overweight (or as we have called it "out of shape") isn't an oppressed group. Apologize if I'm the bearer of bad news but it seems like your entire sh!tty point was based on Faux News.

False this whole presentation if about teaching folks to rack and stack individuals based on appearance and stereotypes while promoting victimhood. This promotes divisiveness and sews the seeds of discord.

God forbid we simply teach to judge folks based on the character and actual actions....novel idea.

All JMU has to do was simply state that JMU will not tolerate any form of discrimination based on............but no JMU took a vastly different approach to teach these kids to dislike one another.

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:01 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

I sure don't know anything about a̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶s̶t̶e̶r̶e̶o̶t̶y̶p̶e̶ Polish Hammer.

Stereotype? Hilarious? You shouldn’t be come off as so prejudiced like when you pre judge people and put them in categories with your stereotypes and try and make light of them.

(08-20-2021 10:28 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:01 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

I sure don't know anything about a̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶s̶t̶e̶r̶e̶o̶t̶y̶p̶e̶ Polish Hammer.

Stereotype? Hilarious? You shouldn’t be come off as so prejudiced like when you pre judge people and put them in categories with your stereotypes and try and make light of them.

Oddly enough JMU does not give this presentation at campus tours, springboard, or student recruiting events, I wonder why........

Also, I am pretty sure that 75% or more of the donations that flow into JMU come from the very groups they identify as oppressors.........i guess that oppressed side of the slide is gonna need to step up donations in the near future.

(08-20-2021 10:27 AM)Purple Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:01 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

I sure don't know anything about a̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶s̶t̶e̶r̶e̶o̶t̶y̶p̶e̶ Polish Hammer.

Is that a Polack joke?

Haha, no it is not. I'm drawing a far-too-familiar parallel between PH's comment about how if I don't like it, I can [essentially get out] and a certain demographic of people South Park have lampooned with their "if you don't like it you can giiiiit out" bit.

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)JMU85 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:10 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  So you are aware that it was Fox News wording right? It isn't JMU's. According to the JMU training linked by the article in the link you are pointing to, overweight (or as we have called it "out of shape") isn't an oppressed group. Apologize if I'm the bearer of bad news but it seems like your entire sh!tty point was based on Faux News.

From the presentation.

I am changing my board handle to Fat Bald Cracker.

I will post my address later for you to mail your reparations checks to.

I'm just trying to levitate the situation.

(08-20-2021 10:32 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:27 AM)Purple Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:01 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

I sure don't know anything about a̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶s̶t̶e̶r̶e̶o̶t̶y̶p̶e̶ Polish Hammer.

Is that a Polack joke?

Haha, no it is not. I'm drawing a far-too-familiar parallel between PH's comment about how if I don't like it, I can [essentially get out] and a certain demographic of people South Park have lampooned with their "if you don't like it you can giiiiit out" bit.

Never said to anyone to get out, we’re all entitled to be here and have our opinions. However, my point was if mine bothers you so much you can easily mute me and/or not respond directly to me and solicit a response.

(08-20-2021 10:32 AM)ShadyP Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:28 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:01 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

I sure don't know anything about a̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶s̶t̶e̶r̶e̶o̶t̶y̶p̶e̶ Polish Hammer.

Stereotype? Hilarious? You shouldn’t be come off as so prejudiced like when you pre judge people and put them in categories with your stereotypes and try and make light of them.

Oddly enough JMU does not give this presentation at campus tours, springboard, or student recruiting events, I wonder why........

Also, I am pretty sure that 75% or more of the donations that flow into JMU come from the very groups they identify as oppressors.........i guess that oppressed side of the slide is gonna need to step up donations in the near future.

Hey, that's the same way Al Sharpton shakes down corporations for big dough. If it works for him, it should work for JMU. If you don't give and give big, YOU'RE A RACIST!!

(08-20-2021 10:33 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)JMU85 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:10 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  So you are aware that it was Fox News wording right? It isn't JMU's. According to the JMU training linked by the article in the link you are pointing to, overweight (or as we have called it "out of shape") isn't an oppressed group. Apologize if I'm the bearer of bad news but it seems like your entire sh!tty point was based on Faux News.

From the presentation.

"Overweight" = / = "physical disability." Courts all over the country have said as such.

(08-20-2021 10:35 AM)Purple Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:32 AM)ShadyP Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:28 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)bjk3047 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:01 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  PS: don’t like my views you could always hit the mute button as well as not quote my post and initiate discussion with such an oppressive person.

I sure don't know anything about a̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶s̶t̶e̶r̶e̶o̶t̶y̶p̶e̶ Polish Hammer.

Stereotype? Hilarious? You shouldn’t be come off as so prejudiced like when you pre judge people and put them in categories with your stereotypes and try and make light of them.

Oddly enough JMU does not give this presentation at campus tours, springboard, or student recruiting events, I wonder why........

Also, I am pretty sure that 75% or more of the donations that flow into JMU come from the very groups they identify as oppressors.........i guess that oppressed side of the slide is gonna need to step up donations in the near future.

Hey, that's the same way Al Sharpton shakes down corporations for big dough. If it works for him, it should work for JMU.

Maybe so.......but don't think it is gonna make folks that donate to JMU cut bigger checks....i know one that will only be giving the minimum to park in C4 going forward.....and that is a lot less than i have been donating for over a decade.

Well, this has certainly turned into a fun exercise!

(08-20-2021 10:38 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:33 AM)Polish Hammer Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:21 AM)JMU85 Wrote:  

(08-20-2021 10:10 AM)DoubleDogDare Wrote:  So you are aware that it was Fox News wording right? It isn't JMU's. According to the JMU training linked by the article in the link you are pointing to, overweight (or as we have called it "out of shape") isn't an oppressed group. Apologize if I'm the bearer of bad news but it seems like your entire sh!tty point was based on Faux News.

From the presentation.

"Overweight" = / = "physical disability." Courts all over the country have said as such.

So you can sarcastically apologize to your previous post in an effort to antagonize, but when your whole shiity is proven wrong with the actual JMU training material, and not Fox News,you can’t even admit how wrong you were.