It is necessary to specifically tell Congress that if Congress does not help Ukraine, Ukraine will lose the war,” Zelensky said during a video meeting of Kyiv-organised fundraising platform United24, per AFP.

Zelensky said it would be “difficult” for Ukraine to “stay” (survive) without the latest aid on top of an estimated $113 billion already sent to Kyiv at the cost of $900 per American household.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/04...ssia-wins/

They've already lost. All Russia wants is the area in the East. Everywhere else in Ukraine is normal.

hey look… another Russian troll farm sourced news outlet…
you know, the very one’s you pretend to read.

(04-09-2024 09:27 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  hey look… another Russian troll farm sourced news outlet…
you know, the very one’s you pretend to read.

Zelensky said it would be “difficult” for Ukraine to “stay” (survive) without the latest aid on top of an estimated $113 billion already sent to Kyiv at the cost of $900 per American household.

Not one more penny.

We have enough problems at home.

(04-09-2024 09:36 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-09-2024 09:27 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  hey look… another Russian troll farm sourced news outlet…
you know, the very one’s you pretend to read.

Zelensky said it would be “difficult” for Ukraine to “stay” (survive) without the latest aid on top of an estimated $113 billion already sent to Kyiv at the cost of $900 per American household.

He’s right and he’s neutralizing an existential threat to NATO & fighting for Ukrainian sovereignty without the US committing troops.
Certainly, Putin will test NATO resolve next; and then, we’re in.

(04-09-2024 10:09 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(04-09-2024 09:36 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-09-2024 09:27 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  hey look… another Russian troll farm sourced news outlet…
you know, the very one’s you pretend to read.

Zelensky said it would be “difficult” for Ukraine to “stay” (survive) without the latest aid on top of an estimated $113 billion already sent to Kyiv at the cost of $900 per American household.

He’s right and he’s neutralizing an existential threat to NATO & fighting for Ukrainian sovereignty without the US committing troops.
Certainly, Putin will test NATO resolve next; and then, we’re in.

If Biden wasn't such a ppussy and upheld the Budapest Memorandum and told Putin his troops would be blown into oblivion as soon as they stepped onto Ukrainian soil none of this would have happened. Putin is a bully and seeks out the weak. That's why he took Ukrainian land under Obama AND Biden but skipped over testing Trump. We have sent bad money after good to Ukraine and have no clue where it went, and all while letting anyone who wants to come into the US. How stupid.

Well Mensa if you think Zelinsky needs help, you can start sending him your check every week or volunteer in the war effort over there.

The entire European Union can either take care of this or live with it. The U.S. should not be the first source of money or arms.

(04-09-2024 09:36 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-09-2024 09:27 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  hey look… another Russian troll farm sourced news outlet…
you know, the very one’s you pretend to read.

Zelensky said it would be “difficult” for Ukraine to “stay” (survive) without the latest aid on top of an estimated $113 billion already sent to Kyiv at the cost of $900 per American household.

Not a controversial statement. It would be difficult for Russia to "win" in Ukraine without the help they are getting from China, N Korea, and Iran. It would have been difficult for Britain to win WWII without the US aid. Hell, it would be difficult for the US government to survive if they stopped demanding an additional payment each year on April 15th from the US taxpayer. Like Ive said---if you dont want a situation where the NATO nations start escalating this by actually sending troops to Ukraine---the best way to avoid it is to send Ukraine enough weapons that they can block a Russian conquest with just their own forces.

(04-09-2024 11:32 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(04-09-2024 09:36 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-09-2024 09:27 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  hey look… another Russian troll farm sourced news outlet…
you know, the very one’s you pretend to read.

Zelensky said it would be “difficult” for Ukraine to “stay” (survive) without the latest aid on top of an estimated $113 billion already sent to Kyiv at the cost of $900 per American household.

Not a controversial statement. It would be difficult for Russia to "win" in Ukraine without the help they are getting from China, N Korea, and Iran. It would have been difficult for Britain to win WWII without the US aid. Hell, it would be difficult for the US government to survive if they stopped demanding an additional payment each year on April 15th from the US taxpayer. Like Ive said---if you dont want a situation where the NATO nations start escalating this by actually sending troops to Ukraine---the best way to avoid it is to send Ukraine enough weapons that they can block a Russian conquest with just their own forces.

Dont care what they do. Period.